Hi,
Often when we find a bug in some code we use, we work around it in amsn
code, or have a local patches copy of the other project. (2 latest
example are commits 8758 (DEMANDS_ATTENTION) and 8759 (snit tcl
8.5a6 ). It is absolutely very good that we do this, and we should
continue doing so.
no problem. actually a CreateProfile creates the new profile, writes the new
config and reactivates the last profile. i think this behavior is still from
the time before you introduced the new login window, but that isn't really
useful when you try to login with the new profile after that because
Commited in r8762 on trunk
Branch will be synced later
Phil
Mirko Hansen a écrit :
no problem. actually a CreateProfile creates the new profile, writes the
new config and reactivates the last profile. i think this behavior is
still from the time before you introduced the new login window, but
I do think you're right and that it would be very ueful, unfortunately, I'm
also pretty sure that in the end, we
won't be able to do it. We can't even keep a TODO list in the wiki, so think
about keeping that kindd of thing
documented!
We could try if you're willing to drive this, I wouldn't
why don't use something like this: http://wiki.tcl.tk/5598
you can mark workarounds directly on code, and use this tool to extract the
information :)
On 5/25/07, Youness Alaoui [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I do think you're right and that it would be very ueful, unfortunately,
I'm also pretty sure
