This was introduced in r7667, so if you want to revert it, just somebody
with svn access should apply this patch.
Regards,
Youness Alaoui wrote:
Humm.. no, 8.5 is still considered unstable and I don't know why it was put
into SVN...
we should probably revert this..
thx for noticing and
Reverted commit @ r7692.
Thanks Rafael.
KKRT
On Fri, Dec 22, 2006 at 07:47:38PM +0100, Javier Merino wrote:
This was introduced in r7667, so if you want to revert it, just somebody
with svn access should apply this patch.
Regards,
Youness Alaoui wrote:
Humm.. no, 8.5 is still
^_^
Thx to u and all working hard on 0.97 ;)
On 12/22/06, Youness Alaoui [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Reverted commit @ r7692.
Thanks Rafael.
KKRT
On Fri, Dec 22, 2006 at 07:47:38PM +0100, Javier Merino wrote:
This was introduced in r7667, so if you want to revert it, just somebody
with
...anyone? just not to forget about it...
On 12/18/06, Youness Alaoui [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Humm.. no, 8.5 is still considered unstable and I don't know why it was put
into SVN...
we should probably revert this..
thx for noticing and letting us know.
KKRT
On Mon, Dec 18, 2006 at
Humm.. no, 8.5 is still considered unstable and I don't know why it was put
into SVN...
we should probably revert this..
thx for noticing and letting us know.
KKRT
On Mon, Dec 18, 2006 at 12:37:04AM +, Rafael Rodríguez wrote:
Mmm... the latest changes to debian/control were rejected from
