I will do it tomorrow evening...
Phil
Le Tuesday 13 June 2006 20:17, Youness Alaoui a écrit :
> On Tue, 13 Jun 2006 12:44:24 -0400, Philippe Valembois - Phil
>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I totally agree with you... Users have to use perfect softwares and not
> > buggy
> > drivers...
> > Anyw
On Tue, 13 Jun 2006 12:44:24 -0400, Philippe Valembois - Phil
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I totally agree with you... Users have to use perfect softwares and not
> buggy
> drivers...
> Anyway, I try to know where is the bug... Why ? Because with that it's
> the
> first time I hack in the ke
I totally agree with you... Users have to use perfect softwares and not buggy
drivers...
Anyway, I try to know where is the bug... Why ? Because with that it's the
first time I hack in the kernel level... And I like that ;) It's so bad I
haven't a pwc compliant cam. Else, I already had tracked t
A buggy driver is not our fault, that is very clear. But if we know a
work-around, we MAY use that to make things easier for our users. Of course
we should not spend 3 days of programming to work around a bug that is not
our fault, but a 10-minute fix is okay. And where the line is in between,
not only that, but we'd need to shift the responsability... we really
should stop being so nice to the users, look at what happened lately in
the forums because of AA fonts and tcl/tk 8.5... he was a stupid bastard
but let's take his example
why bother if the problem isn't ours ? If users
but we can still say: go update or don't bother us. Anyway it is
important to let upstream know about this
On Mon, 2006-06-12 at 19:16 +0200, Harry Vennik wrote:
> of course that's a good thing to do, but it won't fix it for users with an
> older pwc, and we cannot assume all users will upgrade.
of course that's a good thing to do, but it won't fix it for users with an
older pwc, and we cannot assume all users will upgrade. some might even not
know how to do it, or not have root access to the system.
Op maandag 12 juni 2006 18:49, schreef Philippe Valembois - Phil:
> Why not contacting
So what does upstream say about this bug?
On Mon, 2006-06-12 at 18:40 +0200, Harry Vennik wrote:
> I think it simply isn't an amsn bug, but a driver bug.
> The streaming support on pwc seems to be somewhat buggy.
> That is why clearing the V4L2_CAP_STREAMING capability flag will make it work.
> On
Why not contacting Luc Saillard to inform him of the bug ?
Phil
Le Monday 12 June 2006 18:40, Harry Vennik a écrit :
> I think it simply isn't an amsn bug, but a driver bug.
> The streaming support on pwc seems to be somewhat buggy.
> That is why clearing the V4L2_CAP_STREAMING capability flag wil
I think it simply isn't an amsn bug, but a driver bug.
The streaming support on pwc seems to be somewhat buggy.
That is why clearing the V4L2_CAP_STREAMING capability flag will make it work.
On v4l the streaming support is not available at all, so it will always work.
And if indeed it is a driver
Hi,
for me the better solution is to find the bug and eliminate it
Phil
P.S. I don't have marks anymore only curses, so I consider I am almost in
holidays !
Le Monday 12 June 2006 18:17, Harry Vennik a écrit :
> But that's not much of an argument here, because any solution will require
> patc
But that's not much of an argument here, because any solution will require
patching libng or even its v4l2 driver.
Anyway, by doing it Youness' way we will avoid an ugly thing like if(driver ==
pwc) { . } by adding a real feature. The only disadvantage being all
reports about 'webcam not r
No without patching libng...
Phil
Le Sunday 11 June 2006 22:45, Youness Alaoui a écrit :
> can't we make it use the driver you choose ? for example, the user can
> choose v4l or v4l2 from the list of devices, so if he chooses v4l, the v4l
> driver will be used, if he chooses v4l2, then the v4l2 dr
can't we make it use the driver you choose ? for example, the user can
choose v4l or v4l2 from the list of devices, so if he chooses v4l, the v4l
driver will be used, if he chooses v4l2, then the v4l2 driver will be
used... and have a label (we already have one, right ?) for pwc users that
Problem found.
There are 2 work-arounds:
- If we somehow unset the V4L2_CAP_STREAMING flag for pwc, it will work.
- If we force pwc to v4l instead of v4l2 it will also work.
The first one seems quite ugly to me, so IMO forcing to v4l is the way to go.
Op zondag 11 juni 2006 17:26, schreef Vivia
Le Sunday 11 June 2006 20:48, Harry Vennik a écrit :
> Op zondag 11 juni 2006 18:39, schreef Max:
> > Well, i think phil already started fixing it... He made me do some stuff
> > with the webcam and give him the output but he ran out of time and i
> > haven't seen him since on irc.
> >
> > Here is
Op zondag 11 juni 2006 18:39, schreef Max:
> Well, i think phil already started fixing it... He made me do some stuff
> with the webcam and give him the output but he ran out of time and i
> haven't seen him since on irc.
>
> Here is the webcam debug output when i open the v4l1 channel of my pwc
>
Ooops I was working on porting my webcam driver to V4L2 :s
I go immediately to IRC...
Phil
Le Sunday 11 June 2006 18:39, Max a écrit :
> Well, i think phil already started fixing it... He made me do some stuff
> with the webcam and give him the output but he ran out of time and i
> haven't seen hi
you have this, and the GUI thing where the 'cancel login' doesn't appear
in the menu when we are logging in... in case network error or whatever,
at least we can cancel... very annoying...
KKRT
On Sun, 11 Jun 2006 12:39:47 -0400, Max <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well, i think phil already s
Well, i think phil already started fixing it... He made me do some stuff with the webcam and give him the output but he ran out of time and i haven't seen him since on irc.Here is the webcam debug output when i open the v4l1 channel of my pwc webcam in the amsn prefs :
http://verzier.info/pub/amsn
On Sun, 11 Jun 2006, Max wrote:
> I see at least one thing missing (imho) in the TODO-list and it is a bug
> fix for the pwc webcam's drivers. It was working perfectly before but it
> stopped working after 6511 (i checked). (i'am talking about the "not
> released webcam").
Thanx!! :)
(BTW, bu
I see at least one thing missing (imho) in the TODO-list and it is a bug fix for the pwc webcam's drivers. It was working perfectly before but it stopped working after 6511 (i checked). (i'am talking about the "not released webcam").
On 6/11/06, Vivia Nikolaidou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sun, 1
On Sun, 11 Jun 2006, Youness Alaoui wrote:
> On Sun, 11 Jun 2006 00:06:12 -0400, Youness Alaoui
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > yes ? no ?
> >
>
> YES.
> SO WHERE THE FUCK IS EVERYBODY :@
I just woke up. Good morning!
Seriously, we have an empty TODO-list, so this can explain all the
On Sun, 11 Jun 2006 00:06:12 -0400, Youness Alaoui
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> yes ? no ?
>
YES.
SO WHERE THE FUCK IS EVERYBODY :@
--
KaKaRoTo
___
Amsn-devel mailing list
Amsn-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/l
yes ? no ?
--
KaKaRoTo
___
Amsn-devel mailing list
Amsn-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amsn-devel
25 matches
Mail list logo
