On 21 Nov 1999, Chris Halverson wrote:
Abigail Marshall [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Another question: is there a way to set up analog to email a text-based
report, rather than create an HTML file? I want to do both, actually
Have your script call 'lynx' or 'w3m' on the report and have
Dennis Heltzel schrieb:
Has anyone successfully used analog to process logs from
IIS Web Proxy Server ?
Do you actually mean Microsoft's Proxy Server?
In earlier replies to the list I posted a variety of LOGFORMATS for MS-Proxy.
However, because of the size of logs that were generated, I
Analog doesn't analyse the error log. See the FAQ. You should be OK with the
rest of the logfiles.
--
Stephen Turner[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.statslab.cam.ac.uk/~sret1/
Statistical Laboratory, 16 Mill Lane, Cambridge CB2 1SB, England
"As always, it's considered good practice to
On Sun, 21 Nov 1999, Tristan Lawrence wrote:
I am used to using Joshua Cooley's excellent browsers.txt file with
Analog 3 to make the browser report easier to read.
As I was researching an upgrade to Analog 4, I noticed that there was a
note on the third party applications page to the
On Mon, 22 Nov 1999, Dave Cundiff wrote:
Hi,
I was wondering if analog was able to show distinct hits on the
file and dir reports. Also if it could do it on the daily, monthly,
hourly and so forth reports. I looked thru the documentation but didn't
see anything that mentioned that.
On 22 Nov 1999, Greg Stark wrote:
I'm experimenting with cache files and it seems like I'm getting huge cache
files. 61M in fact. That's a lot smaller than the log files, but I had been
expecting much smaller files.
They have to store every filename and every hostname that's ever visited
On Mon, 22 Nov 1999, bill wrote:
I have installed and compiled analog on my Unix/Apache system but can't
compile the cgi program correctly.
The resulting cgi script is mostly programming/binary gibberish (as
opposed to ascii/cgi).
That's because it's a CGI _program_ not a CGI _script_.
I have installed and compiled analog on my Unix/Apache system but can't
compile the cgi program correctly.
The resulting cgi script is mostly programming/binary gibberish (as
opposed to ascii/cgi).
Any ideas?
kind regards,
bill hollett
hi,
I just ran analog coupled with report magic to produce a sample report for a
guinea pig site over here.
In the user report, I've spotted a lot of differences. For example, some names
are capitalised in the old version, and are not in the new, others are in
different positions. Most
On Mon, 22 Nov 1999, Alejandro Fernandez wrote:
hi,
I just ran analog coupled with report magic to produce a sample report for a
guinea pig site over here.
In the user report, I've spotted a lot of differences. For example, some names
are capitalised in the old version, and are not in
Title: no subject
How do I run out reports for a single Web site? Our reports contain all the
web sites we manage.
Chris Halverson wrote:
Abigail Marshall [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Another question: is there a way to set up analog to email a text-based
report, rather than create an HTML file? I want to do both, actually
Have your script call 'lynx' or 'w3m' on the report and have it email
you. A
Title: Reports on single domain names
How do I run out reports for a single Web site? Our reports contain all the
web sites we manage.
Pardon the 'near topic' topic ... the issue of favicon.ico
came up a few months back. (shows up in logs and is used by IE
in case you missed it) Was wondering if anyone knows of a utility
to convert .gif or .jpg to .ico ??
Yes, I do mean Microsoft's Proxy Server.
Anything you could provide would be great. I'd also be interested in your shell
script. I am already pre-processing the logs with a sheall script to remove
some unwanted "fluff", so your script could really help a lot.
Dennis
Wallace Nicoll [EMAIL
Bob Gonda wrote:
How do I run out reports for a single Web site? Our reports contain
all the
web sites we manage.
Depending on how your site is managed, either FILEINCLUDE/FILEXCLUDE or
VHOSTINCLUDE/VHOSTEXCLUDE
see docs/include.html for details on these commands
HTH
--
Jeremy Wadsack
Stephen Turner [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 22 Nov 1999, Greg Stark wrote:
I'm experimenting with cache files and it seems like I'm getting huge cache
files. 61M in fact. That's a lot smaller than the log files, but I had been
expecting much smaller files.
They have to store
17 matches
Mail list logo
