[android-developers] Re: Android 2.0 and ADP (necessary to flash the ADP?)

2009-11-15 Thread Shrenik Vikam
if we want to use/create the wireless or blue-tooth application then what to use ? On Nov 13, 4:57 pm, WoodManEXP woodman...@gmail.com wrote: How are we suppose to take advantage of the 2.0 upgrades if it is not going to be available for the ADPs? Will it ever be available for the ADPs? On

[android-developers] Re: Android 2.0 and ADP (necessary to flash the ADP?)

2009-11-13 Thread WoodManEXP
How are we suppose to take advantage of the 2.0 upgrades if it is not going to be available for the ADPs? Will it ever be available for the ADPs? On Nov 12, 2:24 pm, Disconnect dc.disconn...@gmail.com wrote: That is because android 2.0 is closed source. On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 9:33

[android-developers] Re: Android 2.0 and ADP (necessary to flash the ADP?)

2009-11-12 Thread Thomas Riley
Hello, Sadly 2.0 is only available for the Motorola Droid at the moment, so stick with a 2.0 AVD for now. Tom. On Nov 12, 2:33 pm, WoodManEXP woodman...@gmail.com wrote: Apologies if this is a silly question, but is it necessary to flash an updated OS into the ADP1 to run SDK version 5 apps

[android-developers] Re: Android 2.0 and ADP (necessary to flash the ADP?)

2009-11-12 Thread WoodManEXP
Thank you Tom. This means the android:minSdkVersion in the Manifest should stay at 3 or 4 for now, right, since the ADP can only get to 4? On Nov 12, 9:56 am, Thomas Riley tomrile...@googlemail.com wrote: Hello, Sadly 2.0 is only available for the Motorola Droid at the moment, so stick with a