Thank you for your kind reply!
On 8月2日, 午後9:12, brucko geoff.bruck...@gmail.com wrote:
Sorry for slow reply - been away.
By the way, if I changed LocalBinder to a static inner class, does it
make sense ?
I have made a separate generic class that usually use for all my
services ie one
Sorry for slow reply - been away.
By the way, if I changed LocalBinder to a static inner class, does it
make sense ?
I have made a separate generic class that usually use for all my
services ie one that I import in - just a bit of cut and paste. That
way I can reuse the code for all my
Thank you for your information!!
I will keep watching it out.
By the way, if I changed LocalBinder to a static inner class, does it
make sense ?
That means to return back the same binder for all connections?
On 7月31日, 午前5:24, brucko geoff.bruck...@gmail.com wrote:
This appears to be a bug
Binding to a service is asynchronous. You should maybe disable the
button that binds and unbinds until you are sure that you are
actually, respectively, bound and unbound.
You do that by keeping track of when the ServiceConnection object's
onServiceConnected() and onServiceDisconnected()
This appears to be a bug
http://code.google.com/p/android/issues/detail?id=6426
watch out. If your LocalBinder is a non-static inner class, then you
will leak your Service as well as non-static inner classes have a
reference to the outer class.
--
You received this message because you are
5 matches
Mail list logo
