am using a ViewPager in which I am able to have 3 PagerTabStrip. But I want
to have more than 3, maybe 4 or 5. I tried using setTextSpacing() but that
didn't work. There is no direct option also to have some a some amount of
PaperTitleStrip.
Any Suggestions how can we implement the same.
--
On 05/04/2013 14:56, Jayavelu Viswanathan wrote:
Hi use this free apps
https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.manager.folder.jayfeature=search_result#?t=W251bGwsMSwxLDEsImNvbS5tYW5hZ2VyLmZvbGRlci5qYXkiXQ
..
Stop spamming...
-
Fabien
--
--
You received this message because you
Fragment#isVisible is returning true even if the user has navigated to
another Activity. However #isResumed returns false, so maybe that is the
right target.
On Sunday, April 14, 2013 11:42:06 PM UTC+10, Harri Smått wrote:
Hi,
You could try using Fragment.isVisible() to determine whether
Hi Piren, what is an appropriate definition of Started in this instance?
WIlliam
On Monday, April 15, 2013 1:17:36 AM UTC+10, Piren wrote:
Check the fragment state before showing, it should be Started, if not,
keep a flag saying that says this dialog needs to be shown. Check for the
flag
Thats because it can only display 3. if you want more, you'll have to
create your own.
Just take the source code for the strip and extrapolate it for more than
3, shouldn't be that hard. (or just write your own from
scratch, shouldn't be that hard either)
On Monday, April 15, 2013 10:32:11
No, you don't change uses-permission to uses-feature, you use both.
uses-permission is required to access bluetooth, or you'll get an error.
When you use uses-permission, it's assumed the feature is also required.
Then you use the tag uses-feature and set the attribute required to false.
So you
cool ...I ll try that.
Thanks
On Monday, 15 April 2013 14:12:47 UTC+5:30, Piren wrote:
Thats because it can only display 3. if you want more, you'll have to
create your own.
Just take the source code for the strip and extrapolate it for more than
3, shouldn't be that hard. (or just write
After onStart has been called and before onStop.
You can be more pedantic about the state if needed - using
isHidden/isVisible/isResumed .. since having it as started
does guarantee that the fragment is visible.
On Monday, April 15, 2013 11:32:45 AM UTC+3, William Ferguson wrote:
Hi Piren,
Errr... we need a damn edit button here. i meant: since having it as
started does *not* guarantee that the fragment is visible. :)
On Monday, April 15, 2013 11:47:22 AM UTC+3, Piren wrote:
After onStart has been called and before onStop.
You can be more pedantic about the state if needed
Thanks!
So it is:
uses-permission android:name=android.permission.BLUETOOTH /
uses-permission android:name=android.permission.BLUETOOTH_ADMIN /
uses-feature android:name=android.hardware.bluetooth android:required=
false /
在 2013年4月15日星期一UTC+8下午4时43分27秒，Douglas Drumond写道：
No, you don't
Hm, thanks.
It just seems strange to need to explicitly check to see if the Fragment
isResumed prior to showing a Dialog. Before Fragments, Activity#showDialog
would do nothing if the Activity was already torn down. So it seems kind of
retrograde.
I take it all instances of
Thanks, works perfectly
Very thanks I spent hours working on this problem
El domingo, 14 de abril de 2013 20:50:18 UTC+2, Jonathan S escribió:
on new AlertDialog.Builder(getApplication());, replaces getApplication()
to MainActivity.this
On Sunday, April 14, 2013 10:55:42 AM UTC-4, Carlos
---
You've been invited by Josphat Muchiri to use Google Talk.
If you already have a Google account, login to Gmail and accept this chat
invitation:
http://mail.google.com/mail/b-ab9fb0fd8e-1fe3510e56-lOq8Cf1coFn8dE0gRgTrglXJ760
Hi, is this supposed to be working after 2.3 ? I'm experiencing this
behavior on 4.0.3 and 4.1.1 , URI permissions aren't being granted to an
Activity that was previously running (singleTask), onNewIntent is called
and raises SecurityException when trying to use the content resolver.
Em
Yes, I have done google search on Android Theme collection and
haven't come across anything impressive.
Is there a good collection of web sites where one can purchase/connect
with folks who do theme design for Android?
-Subodh Nijsure
--
--
You received this message because you are
This is interesting. I wanted to find the same thing, but wasn't
successful. However, there are some built in themes like Holo Dark
etc.
On 4/15/13, Subodh Nijsure subodh.nijs...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes, I have done google search on Android Theme collection and
haven't come across anything
What is the BitmapFun example?
I guess I don't have it?
https://lh5.googleusercontent.com/-zAsXty17X88/UWwPF7SJQvI/AXU/_yNdSTUzB7E/s1600/bitmapfun.png
Thanks.
On Sunday, April 14, 2013 5:07:23 PM UTC-5, tsioularisa wrote:
i am using the bitmapfun example and the only part
Hello,
It seems that the maximum number of emulators that can be run on a single
system is 16, since there are a maximum of 16 consoles allowed according to:
http://developer.android.com/tools/devices/emulator.html#console
and I cannot for the life of me locate a way to run an emulator without
I am sorry for didn't mention this. It is from developer android
traininghttp://developer.android.com/training/displaying-bitmaps/index.html.
If you want more info please tell me!
--
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Android Developers group.
To post
It's not really a console problem, more of a port problem..
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/9924274/maximum-number-of-devices-connected-to-an-adb-server
I've done this before. But be aware: you really can't run more than
16 emulators unless you're on a machine with tons of processors (I had
Could you use GCM http://developer.android.com/google/gcm/index.html instead
of rolling your own long-lived connection with independent keepalive?
It'll be better for the users battery and better for the carriers network
and you won't have to figure out issues like these.
On Sat, Apr 13, 2013
Robert,
Could you elaborate on the issues like these part? Are there changes in
Android that developers should be made aware?
I also have an app that uses long persistent server connection, and using
GCM is not an option either.
It seems that with Android 4.1 and 4.2, connections often go dead
Why did you add
*mImageFetcher.clearCache()*?
You do realize that starts a new AsyncTask, don't you?
Starting a new AsyncTask sounds like a really bad idea in onDestroy().
On Sunday, April 14, 2013 5:07:23 PM UTC-5, tsioularisa wrote:
i am using the bitmapfun example and the only
What port number are you using on the server?
Maybe use *port* *80* as it is more open?
Thanks.
On Saturday, April 13, 2013 5:35:13 AM UTC-5, Long wrote:
Hi Developers,
I have an background service which connects my server with a TCP
connection.
My background service sends
Out of curiosity, why would you ever need to run **16 emulators?
Thanks.
On Monday, April 15, 2013 9:46:10 AM UTC-5, Adam wrote:
Hello,
It seems that the maximum number of emulators that can be run on a single
system is 16, since there are a maximum of 16 consoles allowed according
I like it.
You may want to change the name though as *Quickly Search Installed Apps*
is kind of long and not-so-catchy.
Thanks.
On Thursday, April 4, 2013 11:27:56 AM UTC-5, Satendra Pratap wrote:
Hi All,
Please install my first android Free APP : Quickly available in Google
Play
If you're doing large scale testing of your app across a large number
of device configurations, with hundreds of testcases, and you don't
want it to take months.
Kris
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 12:04 PM, bob b...@coolfone.comze.com wrote:
Out of curiosity, why would you ever need to run 16
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 8:44 AM, Kostya Vasilyev kmans...@gmail.com wrote:
Robert,
Could you elaborate on the issues like these part? Are there changes in
Android that developers should be made aware?
By issues like these I just meant the inevitable bugs that will crop up
when making
Have wondered about this too.
I would like to be able to buy or commission a theme like you can buy a
Wordpress theme.
I have hired through ODesk, and hired one person worthwhile and another not
so much.
It wasn't full service in the sense you would get a finished theme, with
all the
I know that i start a new asynctask but it is the only way to auto clear
the memories both lru and disk when the user exits the activity. first of
all i use this (bad) technic because i don't want to waste the user's space
with useless things for him and without let him know how much space do i
2013/4/15 Robert Greenwalt rgreenw...@google.com
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 8:44 AM, Kostya Vasilyev kmans...@gmail.comwrote:
Robert,
Could you elaborate on the issues like these part? Are there changes in
Android that developers should be made aware?
By issues like these I just meant
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 10:46 AM, Kostya Vasilyev kmans...@gmail.comwrote:
2013/4/15 Robert Greenwalt rgreenw...@google.com
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 8:44 AM, Kostya Vasilyev kmans...@gmail.comwrote:
Robert,
Could you elaborate on the issues like these part? Are there changes
in
2013/4/15 Irfan Sheriff isher...@gmail.com
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 10:46 AM, Kostya Vasilyev kmans...@gmail.comwrote:
I've seen GTalk's service menu, it seems it has separate keep-alive logic
for mobile vs. WiFi Why? I can't tell just by reading the Android
networking docs.
I
u
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 10:46 AM, Kostya Vasilyev kmans...@gmail.comwrote:
2013/4/15 Robert Greenwalt rgreenw...@google.com
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 8:44 AM, Kostya Vasilyev kmans...@gmail.comwrote:
Robert,
Could you elaborate on the issues like these part? Are there changes
in
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 11:50 AM, Kostya Vasilyev kmans...@gmail.comwrote:
2013/4/15 Irfan Sheriff isher...@gmail.com
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 10:46 AM, Kostya Vasilyev kmans...@gmail.comwrote:
I've seen GTalk's service menu, it seems it has separate keep-alive
logic for mobile vs.
I think he's suggesting that if app developers can't rely on wifi not
losing packets on this hardware with the AP it will see in the wild, we
should disable optimizations in general.
I think we found from our testing that the optimizations worked with a high
percentage of AP - all AP we tested
2013/4/15 Robert Greenwalt rgreenw...@google.com
Most ipv4 is behind nats. Even on the carrier side. Each NATing agent
will have a timeout - no activity and they forget the connection state and
your connection is broken.
Keeping the device from going into deep sleep helped avoid the
2013/4/15 Irfan Sheriff isher...@gmail.com
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 11:50 AM, Kostya Vasilyev kmans...@gmail.comwrote:
Should there be a system level setting to turn off those power
optimizations, if they're known to not be compatible with all (taken as a
metaphorical term) access point /
I read here
http://developer.android.com/guide/practices/screen-compat-mode.htmlthat
under certain conditions, (optinal) compatibility mode is available to the
users.
But I can't find it on the device, I looked in the menu of the app, in
app's settings, display settings, etc. Nothing with
That's it.
--
Douglas Drumond
http://drumond19.com
2013/4/15 limtc thyech...@gmail.com
Thanks!
So it is:
uses-permission android:name=android.permission.BLUETOOTH /
uses-permission android:name=android.permission.BLUETOOTH_ADMIN /
uses-feature android:name=android.hardware.bluetooth
So, now I tested again with the emulator.
I started the shipped AVD for the nexus 7. 800 x 1280 tvdpi.
According to my dip calculatioon, the smallest side (800), with this
density (~216ppi), is ~479 dp
Now, according to the documentation:
supports-screens android:compatibleWidthLimitDp=320 /
This is strange, since the text disappears completly as soon as the view is
rotated just a little bit. And it only happens on 4.x. I'm already using
the camera.
But I solved it rendering the textviews to bitmaps, for now.
Am Montag, 18. März 2013 23:07:53 UTC+1 schrieb Romain Guy (Google):
What exactly does your onDestroy method look like?
My guess is that it looks like this:
*@Override*
*protected void onDestroy() {*
*super.onDestroy();*
* mImageFetcher.clearCache();*
*mImageFetcher.closeCache();*
*}*
I'm pretty sure that's an error. The last two
It seems that this combination works:
uses-sdk android:minSdkVersion=7 android:targetSdkVersion=8/
*supports-screens android:largestWidthLimitDp=400 /*
Confirmation follows.
Am Dienstag, 19. März 2013 17:46:49 UTC+1 schrieb user123:
I'm trying to force compatibility mode on tablets,
Ah, no, I became happy too quickly. I was launching an old version of the
app (where I used 320 dip). So the problem is still the same. No
compatibility mode.
Am Montag, 15. April 2013 23:05:37 UTC+2 schrieb user123:
It seems that this combination works:
uses-sdk
Let's just think about this for a minute.
320 dp is 2 inches.
Here are the specs for your Galaxy Nexus:
1280×720 px *(316 ppi)
So, we are interested in the smallest side. That is 720.
720/316 = 2.27848101266 inches
So, it is rightly going into compatibility mode on your Galaxy phone since
You are right it is exactly as you wrote it! But if i don't implement it in
this way how can i achieve to clear the cache every time the user leaves
the activity? I think it is not good user experience to consume storage for
things that he can't use. Also i am not sure but if the file becomes
The problem is the Nexus 7. The smallest side is 4.72 inches. But I can put
max. 320 dp in the manifest for it to go in compatibility mode. With 321 it
doesn't work anymore.
Am Montag, 15. April 2013 23:30:37 UTC+2 schrieb bob:
Let's just think about this for a minute.
320 dp is 2
Now I also tested with a tablet emulator with 10.1 diagonal. The smallest
side should be something around 7 inches. And I still get compatibility
mode only until max. 320 dp, like in the Nexus 7.
Am Montag, 15. April 2013 23:53:26 UTC+2 schrieb user123:
The problem is the Nexus 7. The
Please see this concerning the *execute* method for an AsyncTask:
https://lh6.googleusercontent.com/-zRYXmRbRHfg/UWx7De5IsGI/AXk/vEGbuxjGl8w/s1600/message.png
In particular, for certain versions of Android, your two tasks may run in
parallel. However, in Honeycomb onwards, they
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 12:24 PM, Kostya Vasilyev kmans...@gmail.comwrote:
2013/4/15 Irfan Sheriff isher...@gmail.com
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 11:50 AM, Kostya Vasilyev kmans...@gmail.comwrote:
Should there be a system level setting to turn off those power
optimizations, if they're
I have a doubt as to leave the screen only in portrait and reversePortrait,
tested code, but only when the screen turns reversePortrait, I can not go
back to portrait. why?
in my MainActivity.class
@Overridepublic void onConfigurationChanged(Configuration
newConfig)
So then this:
The console port number must be an even integer between 5554 and 5584,
inclusive.port+1 must also be free and will be reserved for ADB.
from:
http://developer.android.com/tools/help/emulator.html
is just lying?
If that's so, it just seems that adb is trying to do the work for
rh,
In order to make a calendar app you should need to even have to worry about
the source for the Android OS. What you will need is the Android SDK which
you can get at http://developer.android.com/sdk/index.html, You'll want to
look towards the bottom of the page under download for other
Hi,
Need help in understanding the following case,
Say I have a view '*child*' created in Application context, I add '*child*'
to a parent '*Parent A*' which is in context of Activity '*A*'.
I switch the activity to Activity '*B*' where I would want to add '*child*'
to parent '*Parent B'* which
55 matches
Mail list logo
