[android-developers] Re: Announcing RoboGuice 1.0

2010-04-07 Thread ko5tik
On Apr 6, 9:06 pm, Michael Burton m...@niskala.org wrote: Hi ko5tik, Good idea, I agree that injection is not as simple as it should be for objects instantiated manually.  I've added your suggestion here:http://code.google.com/p/roboguice/issues/detail?id=34 When you say you're not

Re: [android-developers] Re: Announcing RoboGuice 1.0

2010-04-06 Thread Michael Burton
Hi Matthias, I'm with you on the sluggishness issues. I had to dial-back my use of libraries like gson because the overhead just ended up being too high. In my experience, run-time impact of RoboGuice isn't that high. As I was telling Manfred a few days ago, I notice zero impact on the Nexus

[android-developers] Re: Announcing RoboGuice 1.0

2010-04-06 Thread ko5tik
Hi Michael, Being developer of pico I'm also watching what you are doing ;) Currently I'm not very happy with size (could/should be less) and inheritance. Though inheritance problem could be solved easily - Just create static method which will inject supplied object out of context:

Re: [android-developers] Re: Announcing RoboGuice 1.0

2010-04-06 Thread Michael Burton
Hi ko5tik, Good idea, I agree that injection is not as simple as it should be for objects instantiated manually. I've added your suggestion here: http://code.google.com/p/roboguice/issues/detail?id=34 When you say you're not happy with inheritance, could you be more specific? Do you mean

[android-developers] Re: Announcing RoboGuice 1.0

2010-04-04 Thread Matthias
I was thinking about using Guice myself before, but hesitated fearing to make the overall sluggishness of the platform even worse. How much of an overhead are talking about in terms of memory footprint and size of bundled libraries? Any noticeable impacts on speed or battery life? How often does