I might have missed something but it looks like Android is not an
enterprise level phone yet. Security is a major concern for the
enterprise.
You have a nice browser, powerfull apps but can't connect to your
enterprise network to get data.
This is one of my main complaint about Android :
Dear Nga,
Yes. Your understanding is correct.
At runtime, the Activity Manager Service performs permission checking
before binding the caller to the service.
What actually happens is that the AMS looks for the ServiceRecord of
the service being bound to.
This record contains service information
My g1 donut says file not found, when I typed file://sdcard/
certificatename.cer Maybe this works only on rooted phones? I also
tried to open the .cer file from my university website (3G connection)
still no luck - file cannot be downloaded, because it is not supported
by the phone...:/ I think a
As you know you can easily load any classes using this api call
//ask for the code of the foreign context to be included and to ignore
any security given by the cross-process(owner) execution
//in working-environment to error checking ...
Context tmpCtxt =
You can load and use the classes, but they will execute with the permission
of your app, not of the app whose code you're borrowing. Or are you saying
the code runs as the other app?
Even if Android did stop app A from borrowing app B's code as found on the
device, app A (or the developer of A)
I am only interested in how to stop someone from loading my class and
executes a function in it, let's say it's an encryption algorithm.
On Oct 28, 3:38 pm, Chris Palmer snackypa...@gmail.com wrote:
You can load and use the classes, but they will execute with the permission
of your app, not of
Best of luck to you; I'm all for web auth alternatives. However, I think
you've got an uphill battle here. The usability concerns you raise and that
your commenters raise are not ancillary to the key problem -- they *are* the
key problem.
The set of secure systems is a subset of the usable
On Oct 27, 1:41 pm, Kevin Phillips alowis...@gmail.com wrote:
Will Android 2.0 be supported on the T-Mobile G1?
If not, I'm rooting ASAP.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Android Discuss group.
To
That's up to tmobile.
If the question is more like is HTC DREAM hardware sufficient for
Android 2.0, the answer is *yes*.
On Oct 27, 1:41 pm, Kevin Phillips alowis...@gmail.com wrote:
Will Android 2.0 be supported on the T-Mobile G1?
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You
If you want to use it on any network besides tmobile, it must not be
simlocked to tmobile.
On Oct 26, 6:37 pm, Steeler cowboyd...@yahoo.com wrote:
Sorry to bump this, but all the differing opinions here have still
left me a little confused. Answers to these questions should clear
things up:
Fact is that android is for phones.
Android is not trying to compete with a desktop wincrap7.
If you want to run linux on your netbook, try any REAL linux distro,
i.e. Fedora.
On Oct 24, 3:20 am, blindfold seeingwithso...@gmail.com wrote:
FYI
The CSE department at UCSD had a Halloween themed social last week,
including a nice little pumpkin carving competition. I decided to
take this opportunity to show Android some love.
My pumpkin:
can this be done? Can Snapdragon do this..
I have HTC Rose with Qualcomm processor and need to run ARM based
application.
is there a virtual machine for phones for things such as this?
thanks in advance.
Chris Glazier
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this
And with ADP1 ?
On Oct 27, 8:08 pm, a genius droidhac...@gmail.com wrote:
That's up to tmobile.
If the question is more like is HTC DREAM hardware sufficient for
Android 2.0, the answer is *yes*.
On Oct 27, 1:41 pm, Kevin Phillips alowis...@gmail.com wrote:
Will Android 2.0 be supported
The ADP1 is an HTC Dream so it's the same answer.
Al.
--
* Looking for Android Apps? - Try http://andappstore.com/ *
==
Funky Android Limited is registered in England Wales with the
company number 6741909.
The views expressed in this email are those of the author and not
necessarily
The market app in 1.6 sure does look spiffy but you guys missed
something huge. Please for the love of god add a filter by developer
type. I know I am not the only person who is sick of developers like
M STAR LLC who spam the market daily with 20+ 'updates' We all know
they haven't changed
Thanks for the tip, I talked to a Vodafone store and the only offered
a 1 year 30 GBP per month contract (totally 360 GBP), so I've ordered
one from Amazon.co.uk which comes with a free bluetooth earpiece for
276.64 GBP - http://bit.ly/3nzHC1
Al.
--
* Looking for Android Apps? - Try
Yeah - they tend to be reluctant to give up phones handset-only when
they are new as obviously they prefer to sell them on more lucrative
contracts. One store turned me down, but the other let me have it with
a little persuasion.
Sounds like you got a good Amazon deal though
For future versions I'm guessing that can only be answered when
they're released.
As for 2.0, that's already been answered in terms of compatibility,
it's down to HTC Google whether or not it happens, and neither tend
to comment on releases for specific devices on this list.
Al.
--
*
Didn't this option used to be disabled on the developer console?
I am thinking of switching from on to off for three reasons :
- it seems to be stopping certain handsets from finding my app
- it doubles the size of my app
- it takes hackers approximately 5 seconds to break this copy
protection
i agree. too frequent updates should not be pushed on top.
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 9:02 AM, schwiz sch...@gmail.com wrote:
The market app in 1.6 sure does look spiffy but you guys missed
something huge. Please for the love of god add a filter by developer
type. I know I am not the only
21 matches
Mail list logo
