On Saturday, March 31, 2012 2:49:05 PM UTC-4, Hendrik Boom wrote:
Or android itself would have to make
that distinction for it, and each user-app pair would effectively have to
have its own userid.
That at least should be possible with platform-only changes. The app
database would need a
On 04/01/2012 04:49 AM, Hendrik Boom wrote:
On Thu, 29 Mar 2012 06:56:34 -0700, Chris Stratton wrote:
On Wednesday, March 28, 2012 6:38:49 PM UTC-4, Hendrik Boom wrote:
Instead of a user-id belonging to a human user, a user-id belong to an
application. So even if they implemented ~ as a
On Thu, 29 Mar 2012 06:56:34 -0700, Chris Stratton wrote:
On Wednesday, March 28, 2012 6:38:49 PM UTC-4, Hendrik Boom wrote:
Instead of a user-id belonging to a human user, a user-id belong to an
application. So even if they implemented ~ as a home directory
(which they may well do), it
On Wednesday, March 28, 2012 6:38:49 PM UTC-4, Hendrik Boom wrote:
Instead of a user-id belonging to a human user, a user-id belong to an
application. So even if they implemented ~ as a home directory (which
they may well do), it wouldn't deal with my case.
The more significant consequence
On Tuesday, March 27, 2012 5:43:43 PM UTC-4, Hendrik Boom wrote:
I have a new android transformer.
I'd like to share it with my wife. Not that it's multiuser in the sense
that we can both use it simultaneously, but rather that when I use it,
I'd have my identity, and she'd have hers. Or
On Wed, 28 Mar 2012 07:30:33 -0700, Chris Stratton wrote:
On Tuesday, March 27, 2012 5:43:43 PM UTC-4, Hendrik Boom wrote:
I have a new android transformer.
I'd like to share it with my wife. Not that it's multiuser in the
sense that we can both use it simultaneously, but rather that when
On Wed, 28 Mar 2012 15:08:16 +, Hendrik Boom wrote:
Thanks. That's the most I realistically was hopping for.
The Nokia 800 made the same mistake. There's really no reason that app
developers can't be made to understand '~' as a directory name.
Finding some documentation, I discover
