Re: [Angstrom-devel] what file kernel configuration really uses?

2013-10-28 Thread matti kaasinen
2013/10/27 Koen Kooi k...@dominion.thruhere.net On Wed, 2013-10-23 at 14:44 +0300, matti kaasinen wrote: 2013/10/23 Khem Raj raj.k...@gmail.com Hi Ulf, Yes, linux.inc seems doing the job as you told - this clears a lot. I had been patching wrong file:${S}/defconfig instead of

Re: [Angstrom-devel] what file kernel configuration really uses?

2013-10-28 Thread matti kaasinen
There is another question, I think I mentioned it earlier also in this chain. I have also asked it in other time as own subject. No-one seems to have opinion about that. Koen, you might know, if it is a feature misbehaviour or problem in my set-up. For instance when I ran those tests I did first

Re: [Angstrom-devel] ubifs operation in u-boot and Linux with am335x device

2013-10-28 Thread matti kaasinen
Now I tried also with erasing: I ran ubiformat and ubiattch with -O 2048 Then in uboot ubi part rootfs gave UBI: attaching mtd1 to ubi0 UBI: physical eraseblock size: 131072 bytes (128 KiB) UBI: logical eraseblock size:129024 bytes UBI: smallest flash I/O unit:2048 UBI: sub-page size:

Re: [Angstrom-devel] what file kernel configuration really uses?

2013-10-28 Thread Ulf Samuelsson
28 okt 2013 kl. 09:06 skrev matti kaasinen matti.kaasi...@gmail.com: 2013/10/27 Koen Kooi k...@dominion.thruhere.net On Wed, 2013-10-23 at 14:44 +0300, matti kaasinen wrote: 2013/10/23 Khem Raj raj.k...@gmail.com Hi Ulf, Yes, linux.inc seems doing the job as you told - this clears a

Re: [Angstrom-devel] what file kernel configuration really uses?

2013-10-28 Thread Ulf Samuelsson
I have noticed this as well and it is highly irritating, Best Regards Ulf Samuelsson 28 okt 2013 kl. 09:23 skrev matti kaasinen matti.kaasi...@gmail.com: There is another question, I think I mentioned it earlier also in this chain. I have also asked it in other time as own subject. No-one