On Mon, 20 Jan 2003, Conor MacNeill [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I think this can be applied to the 1.5 branch - what do you think?
+1
and done 8-)
Stefan
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
If anyone objects to this addition to our default excludes let me know
and I'll back it out. But it bites us switchers and I doubt anyone
cares if this file is copied or compiled, etc.
Erik
On Saturday, January 18, 2003, at 08:32 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ehatcher2003/01/18
Erik Hatcher wrote:
If anyone objects to this addition to our default excludes let me know
and I'll back it out. But it bites us switchers and I doubt anyone
cares if this file is copied or compiled, etc.
Erik,
No problems for me at all. I've closed bug 11880 for this.
On Sunday, January 19, 2003, at 08:06 AM, Conor MacNeill wrote:
No problems for me at all. I've closed bug 11880 for this.
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11880
Oops... sorry, I would have closed it myself if I had known it was an
open issue.
I think this can be applied to the
This patch can have different effects depending on your setup, ranging
from a slight performance hit to a significant boost.
The old directory scanner would traverse the whole directory tree even
if it knew it was following a dead arc - somebody could call
getExcludedFiles of getNotIncludedFiles
