At 05:50 30/11/2001 -0500, Erik Hatcher wrote:
Ant users are very fortunate to have a crew of committers that put their
foot down and prevent many seemingly useful features from making it into
Ant's core - and Ant is sufficiently extensible such that folks that wish to
break the rules can do so
Hi,
Please pardon my ignorance, but I wonder if you can clarify for me a bit
what you mean by this:
Are you relying on available's back door to changing
property values?
Are you simply asking if people are using available at all? If so, my
answer is yes, most definitely. I have a series of
Boy have you let the cat out of the bag now! I never thought about
using the available task this way, the ideas that gives me...
And now you want to remove it?! ;)
--- Erik Hatcher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quick question: Are you relying on available's back door to
changing
property values?
Doh,
Sorry I was such a dummy, I thought about this a little more and figured
out what you were asking. I change my answer to no.
; )
Cheers,
Matt
-Original Message-
From: Matt Lyon
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 9:49 AM
To: Ant Users List
Subject: RE: [POLL] property
On Thu, Nov 29, 2001 at 09:47:24AM -0500, Erik Hatcher wrote:
Quick question: Are you relying on available's back door to changing
property values?
There's a backdoor? Cool!! How do I use it?
;)
But seriously, I've never seen a project with greater disparity between
what users want (perl),
It's called OpenSource !
- Original Message -
From: Jeff Turner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Ant Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 4:41 PM
Subject: Re: [POLL] property immutability hacks
But seriously, I've never seen a project with greater disparity between
what
