On 2002.10.22, Scott Goodwin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If someone knows how to create a new listserv mailing list, say
'[EMAIL PROTECTED]', [...]
Someone with admin. privileges to the LISTSERV installation at AOL would
have to issue a PUT LIST ...
(Yes, just recently I used to administer just
On 2002.10.22, Andrew Piskorski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 03:04:08AM +, Scott Goodwin wrote:
The bugs, features, patches tracking email notifications could be sent to
a separate list, handled the same way the AOLserver discussion list is. I
While you were there,
I don't think anyone was suggested shutting down the AOLserver
discussion list, just creating a new list where SF bug, feature and
patch notifications would go, so those who really wanted to see them can
get them .
Personally I don't think we want to disrupt the current AOLserver
discussion list.
For the folks who do not like the SF email on the regular AS
discussion list, shutting down the regular list and making it SF-only
would be exactly the wrong thing to do.
Personally, I wouldn't mind getting a SF email summary once per week
on this list, or even better, a web link to a summary
Has anyone ever though about using BBS software, like UBB or vBulletin?
It's more like a community. SF is a development environment.
Jim
On Tuesday, October 22, 2002, at 10:51 AM, Scott S. Goodwin wrote:
I don't think anyone was suggested shutting down the AOLserver
discussion list, just
On Tuesday, October 22, 2002, at 11:05 AM, Jim Wilcoxson wrote:
Has anyone ever though about using BBS software, like UBB or vBulletin?
It's more like a community. SF is a development environment.
SF has forums like those, and (once you've bookmarked them) they work just
about the same way.
#3 makes the most sense to me, too.
janine
On Tuesday, October 22, 2002, at 11:04 AM, Peter M. Jansson wrote:
On Tuesday, October 22, 2002, at 10:37 AM, Nathan Folkman wrote:
1. Continue to use existing AOL listserv
2. Start up SF listserv and shut down AOL listserv
3. Keep using the AOL
Janine Sisk wrote:
#3 makes the most sense to me, too.
There is something about the SF email I don't like. I hope everyone
decides to keep using the AOL forum.
--Tom Jackson
This option sounds best to me. The AOLserver listserv works just fine for
me and I find it incredibly valuable. If it ain't broke, don't fix it!
(Bert Lance) I have figured a way to quickly scan SF messages and assess
their relevance, but their formatting of responses _is_ a pain to digest if
I
On 2002.10.22, Scott S. Goodwin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't think anyone was suggested shutting down the AOLserver
discussion list, just creating a new list where SF bug, feature and
patch notifications would go, so those who really wanted to see them can
get them .
Personally I don't
On 2002.10.22, Jim Wilcoxson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What would be cool is if the SF email contained a response link that
went to a web page
It already does this. It's the third line in the email:
Support Requests item #626122, was opened at 2002-10-20 19:25
You can respond by
On 2002.10.22, Jim Wilcoxson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Has anyone ever though about using BBS software, like UBB or vBulletin?
It's more like a community. SF is a development environment.
I strongly urge that we don't consider web-only community software.
Yahoo! Groups meets in the middle,
On 2002.10.22, Nathan Folkman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tuesday, October 22, 2002, at 11:04 AM, Peter M. Jansson wrote:
3. Keep using the AOL listserv for most discussion, and use the SF
listserv for just tracker announcements.
this is something that would be very easy to do. anyone else
On 2002.10.22, Peter M. Jansson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...] As it is, those of us who don't check the OpenACS and OpenNSD
forums regularly miss stuff, [...]
Speaking of which, has anyone checked OpenNSD at all, lately? It seems
completely defunct. Going to http://www.opennsd.org/ is a URL
I liked everything the way it was.
On Tuesday 22 October 2002 04:03 pm, (Via wrote:
On 2002.10.22, Nathan Folkman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Don't worry, I'm not going to shut down anything. Just trying to better
understand what changes can be made to help better serve the community.
I'd be
On 2002.10.22, David Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I liked everything the way it was.
You liked having the SourceForge tracker messages going to
the same mailing list that the rest of the discussion was
going to?
I personally don't mind it either: my MUA (Mutt) is studly,
and through mutt
For better or worse the current AOLserver listserv, in my opinion, has been one the
most successful forums for communication that we've tried thus far. That said, it
wouldn't make much sense to disrupt the status quo.
We went ahead and created a new listserv to siphon off some of the Source
On 2002.10.22, No Name [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nathan, you botched your subscription to the new list and probably used
* instead of putting firstname/lastname. One of the downfalls of
LISTSERV is that it tends to change that across all the lists you're
on. ;-)
-- Dossy
--
Dossy Shiobara
On Tuesday, October 22, 2002, at 05:08 PM, David Walker wrote:
I liked everything the way it was.
While I didn't mind getting the SF tracker messages on the mailing list, I
winced when folks replied to the list, rather than to the tracker, only
because I knew that meant the person who
Thanks Pete for quick response!
Yes, I have used different path before.
Your question: Can you provide the output of this command:
ls -l /users/WWW/AOL/aolserver_3.5/bin
/users/WWW/AOL/aolserver_3.5$ ls -l /users/WWW/AOL/aolserver_3.5/bin
total 396
drwxr-xr-x 2 www www
Durga,
According to your listing, your copy of nssock.so is only 1692 bytes long;
on my i386 RH 6.2 Linux box, mine is 17721 bytes. I think it unlikely
that a later version of gcc would provide that much optimization.
What do you get if you do this:
od -c
On Wednesday, October 23, 2002, at 05:34 AM, Durga wrote:
-rwxr-xr-x 1 www www 1692 Oct 21 15:05 nssock.so*
On a Solaris 8 box, nssock.so is 74752 bytes. Something went very wrong
with your installation procedure.
One for each tracker.
-- Dossy
I'd say let's keep one list for ALL tracker stuff. I don't think the
traffic is high enough for it to be split into multiple lists, so I
don't think there's a need for the added complexity of multiple tracker
mailing lists at this point.
/s.
I'm OK with the 2 list format also.
The subjects of the tracker messages are not significantly different from the
subjects of the list messages. Too much separation and the sourceforge
interface will grow stagnant and important information or questions posted
there by people not on the list or
- Original Message -
From: Dossy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 2:03 PM
Subject: Re: [AOLSERVER] Responding to SourceForge-generated mail
On 2002.10.22, Nathan Folkman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Don't worry, I'm not going to shut down anything.
On 2002.10.23, Durga [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Your question: Can you provide the output of this command:
ls -l /users/WWW/AOL/aolserver_3.5/bin
/users/WWW/AOL/aolserver_3.5$ ls -l /users/WWW/AOL/aolserver_3.5/bin
total 396
drwxr-xr-x 2 www www 512 Oct 21 15:05 ./
Can you give the output of the command:
file /users/WWW/AOL/aolserver_3.5/bin/nssock.so
nssock.so: ELF 32-bit MSB dynamic lib SPARC Version 1, dynamically
linked, not stripped
Yes, something wrong with my installation. I am not able to figure out what
exactly went wrong.
What do you
On 2002.10.23, Durga [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can you give the output of the command:
file /users/WWW/AOL/aolserver_3.5/bin/nssock.so
nssock.so: ELF 32-bit MSB dynamic lib SPARC Version 1, dynamically
linked, not stripped
Yes, something wrong with my installation. I am not able to
On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 05:11:46PM -0400, Dossy wrote:
On 2002.10.22, Peter M. Jansson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...] As it is, those of us who don't check the OpenACS and OpenNSD
forums regularly miss stuff, [...]
Speaking of which, has anyone checked OpenNSD at all, lately? It seems
I'm leaning toward a broken version of libtool, but as others have written,
we'll need to see the entire build output.
On Wednesday, October 23, 2002, at 07:27 AM, Durga wrote:
Can you give the output of the command:
file /users/WWW/AOL/aolserver_3.5/bin/nssock.so
nssock.so: ELF
30 matches
Mail list logo
