Micha³Nasiadka said:
Hi.
I've expierenced problems with running php on aolserver. Aolserver
is segfaulting, while trying to use phpmyadmin, so I think it's
something linked to mysql connectivity from php. Tried changing
stacksize, tried even the devel versions of php, no luck.
Can
This is a very useful feature that would be very helpful for new users
especially. I think it's so good, I would prefer to see it integrated
such that you trigger it with a command line flag to nsd at start time.
Many of you use other tools to perform watchdog activities, which is
great. But
Although very well documented, it looks like the ConnsPerThread
configuration parameter is unimplemented. I've checked in 3.4, 3.5 and
4.0beta8. Can anyone confirm this? Is there any special reason why it is
not implemented?
Now on to the real questions . . .
We have an aolserver here that is
Scott Goodwin wrote:
My vote is to put it in.
/s.
I agree completely. Feature: it is backwards and forward
compatible with existing scripts AND it will make AOLserver
implementation easier for newcomers by eliminating one more piece
of the puzzle.
Jerry
--
AOLserver -
My vote is to put it in too. It sounds particularly useful on Win32 where
its harder to do the watchdog type stuff, and where quite honestly you need
a second watchdog watching the first watchdog ;-)
In older AOLservers there seemed to be a '-k' command line option to kill
the running server.
What version of PHP and AOLserver are you running? You might want to
also contact the folks at php.org as they actually maintain the
AOLserver/PHP module.
Micha Nasiadka wrote:
Hi.
I've expierenced problems with running php on aolserver.
Aolserver is segfaulting, while trying to
Those errors occur when the connection is interrupted in mid-download, such as when a user hits the browser stop before an image is completely downloaded.
Doug
---
Doug Harris(202) 473-3118 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
XD [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: AOLserver Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks for tracking this down. Would you mind filing a few bug reports
on SF? Thanks again!
Matthew Krenzer wrote:
Although very well documented, it looks like the ConnsPerThread
configuration parameter is unimplemented. I've checked in 3.4, 3.5 and
4.0beta8. Can anyone confirm this? Is
On Thursday 05 June 2003 20:12, you wrote:
Although very well documented, it looks like the ConnsPerThread
configuration parameter is unimplemented. I've checked in 3.4, 3.5 and
4.0beta8. Can anyone confirm this? Is there any special reason why it is
not implemented?
Good hint. Mind
We still have instances where AOLServer (3.2) goes deaf for some
reason. The nsd processes are there, but they aren't handling any
requests. So while I think this suggestion is a good idea, it
probably won't take the place of watchdog monitoring, at least not
for real production sites. Are you
-Original Message-
From: AOLserver Discussion [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf
Of Jim Wilcoxson
Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2003 9:35 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [AOLSERVER] [ aolserver-Feature Requests-746579 ] Server
instance
We still have instances where AOLServer (3.2)
Hello,
I am getting a SIGABRT when evaluating string objects in AOLserver 4.0 b6.
The pseudocode is:
interp=Ns_GetConnInterp (Ns_GetConn ())
obj = Tcl_NewStringObj (utf8string, len)
Tcl_IncrRefCount (obj)
repeat a_few_times
Tcl_EvalObjEx (interp, obj, 0)
end
On Friday 06 June 2003 04:28, you wrote:
The implementation in AOLserver 4 is very, very different. The script is
executed then the ENTIRE set of namespaces and procs are saved to the
server's tcl.script pointer.
This effect is not exactly stated in the docs, right, but it is the way
the new
On Thursday 05 June 2003 22:35, you wrote:
for real production sites. Are you running? and Are you answering
requests? are not the same question...
Indeed they are not. I'd add some more confusion by extending
the second to Are you *correctly* answering requests?
So, the solution window may
On Friday 06 June 2003 09:50, you wrote:
At the risk of adding complexity to the parent process, I
wouldn't mind seeing such a monitoring facility added to the
parent process.
That implies, the parent (watchdog) should have at least one
thread with the instantiated Tcl interp with ns_*
Zoran Vasiljevic wrote:
On Friday 06 June 2003 09:50, you wrote:
At the risk of adding complexity to the parent process, I
wouldn't mind seeing such a monitoring facility added to the
parent process.
That implies, the parent (watchdog) should have at least one
thread with the instantiated Tcl
On Friday 06 June 2003 10:29, you wrote:
But maybe it's simpler and more reliable just to put in a bare
bones http get implementation
For people using aolserver as http-server, well, ok.
But there are others, not necessarily employing it
as http-server at all. I think in order to have a
On Friday 06 June 2003 11:48, you wrote:
Zoran Vasiljevic wrote:
I would love to hear some other oppinions. But, I'm already thinking
about what we'd need to do so that both approaches are available.
My simple guess would be that the easiest solution would be to
1/ create a temporary
On Thu, Jun 05, 2003 at 10:55:44AM -0600, Patrick Spence wrote:
Micha?Nasiadka said:
Hi.
I've expierenced problems with running php on aolserver. Aolserver
is segfaulting, while trying to use phpmyadmin, so I think it's
something linked to mysql connectivity from php. Tried
- Original Message -
From: Micha Nasiadka [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 06, 2003 6:16 AM
Subject: Re: [AOLSERVER] aolserver + php
On Thu, Jun 05, 2003 at 10:55:44AM -0600, Patrick Spence wrote:
Micha?Nasiadka said:
Hi.
I've expierenced
On Friday 06 June 2003 02:53 am, Zoran Vasiljevic wrote:
On Friday 06 June 2003 11:48, you wrote:
Zoran Vasiljevic wrote:
I would love to hear some other oppinions. But, I'm already thinking
about what we'd need to do so that both approaches are available.
My simple guess would be
On Friday 06 June 2003 16:12, Don Baccus wrote:
On Friday 06 June 2003 02:53 am, Zoran Vasiljevic wrote:
On Friday 06 June 2003 11:48, you wrote:
Zoran Vasiljevic wrote:
I would love to hear some other oppinions. But, I'm already thinking
about what we'd need to do so that both
Don Baccus wrote:
I would love to have time to contribute to AOLserver
It sounds like you just contributed 4 hours tracking down a bug.
Yes, that's my thinking, too. An ns_sync tthat copies state and ns_eval
that works as it did in AOLserver3 would probably both be useful.
how about:
On Thursday 05 June 2003 22:28, Don Baccus wrote:
The implementation in AOLserver 4 is very, very different. The script is
executed then the ENTIRE set of namespaces and procs are saved to the
server's tcl.script pointer.
Argh!
One EVIL side effect of this is that some of the standard ns_*
On Friday 06 June 2003 17:11, Don Baccus wrote:
On Friday 06 June 2003 08:03 am, Zoran Vasiljevic wrote:
Nevertheles, to be really fair, there is some more work to be done
under the hood to get this working. The problem is in 1/.
Simple interp create won't work since script passed to
On Friday 06 June 2003 17:11, you wrote:
how about:
ns_interp sync
ns_interp eval ?
Hey Tom, thanks!
You just gave me the idea: extend the Tcl interp with custom
ns_interp and do the necessary plumbing on C level before
returning the interp to caller. This might work. Have to check yet.
I
On Friday 06 June 2003 08:15 am, Zoran Vasiljevic wrote:
My initial idea was to simply make the Nsd as static package by doing
Tcl_StaticPackage() at the end of InitInterp() and then do from Tcl:
set interp [interp create]
$interp eval {load Nsd}
$interp eval [ns_ictl get]
and so on...
On Friday 06 June 2003 08:12 am, Lamar Owen wrote:
On Thursday 05 June 2003 22:28, Don Baccus wrote:
The implementation in AOLserver 4 is very, very different. The script is
executed then the ENTIRE set of namespaces and procs are saved to the
server's tcl.script pointer.
Argh!
One
THis isn't the listserv I wanted to be connected to, how do i get off this one??
thanks
--
AOLserver - http://www.aolserver.com/
To Remove yourself from this list: http://www.aolserver.com/listserv.html
List information and options: http://listserv.aol.com/
On Friday 06 June 2003 11:50, Don Baccus wrote:
On Friday 06 June 2003 08:12 am, Lamar Owen wrote:
The other side effect (that we've been seeing complained about lately) is
related to the following in acs-tcl
I didn't bother mentioning these because I thought pointing out the problem
with
Sorry to post this to the list :-(
I can't seem to get a response from LISTSERV, either by email or using
the web interface.
Whoever is an admin on this list, please email me.
--
Tom Poindexter
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.nyx.net/~tpoindex/
--
AOLserver - http://www.aolserver.com/
To Remove
On Fri, 6 Jun 2003 11:12:43 -0400, Lamar Owen wrote:
So, when a patch for OpenACS that doesn't use ns_eval is ready, those of you
who have problems with the nsdb0 stuff, if yu could please determine whether
the elimination of ns_eval fixes it.
I made a patch
On Friday 06 June 2003 11:54 am, Vinod Kurup wrote:
On Fri, 6 Jun 2003 11:12:43 -0400, Lamar Owen wrote:
So, when a patch for OpenACS that doesn't use ns_eval is ready, those of
you who have problems with the nsdb0 stuff, if yu could please determine
whether the elimination of ns_eval fixes
Hello,
when I start AOLServer on NetBSD -current it gives an error:
Ns_Tls: invalid key: 0: sould bee between 1 and 100
and dumps core.
Can sombody tell me what it means?
TIA
Feri
--
AOLserver - http://www.aolserver.com/
To Remove yourself from this list:
In a message dated 6/6/2003 6:03:40 PM Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hello,
when I start AOLServer on NetBSD -current it gives an error:
Ns_Tls: invalid key: 0: sould bee between 1 and 100
and dumps core.
Can sombody tell me what it means?
TIA
Feri
which version? i had
On Friday, June 6, 2003, at 05:42 PM, Don Baccus wrote:
(for those of you not part of the OpenACS community, Vinod is a
practicing MD.
Isn't Open Source great?)
Open Source definitely is great. I can't wait for the day that my
patients come with error logs and gdb-hook-ups. Then my 2 worlds will
On Friday 06 June 2003 06:13 pm, you wrote:
On Friday, June 6, 2003, at 05:42 PM, Don Baccus wrote:
(for those of you not part of the OpenACS community, Vinod is a
practicing MD.
Isn't Open Source great?)
Open Source definitely is great. I can't wait for the day that my
patients come
On Friday 06 June 2003 06:27 pm, you wrote:
A guy I know - a research biochemist who is very fit and in his mid-fifties
but has been having episodes of skipping heart beats, racing etc - was
given a really cool device by OHSU, our local med school.
Sorry I meant to e-mail that to Vinod
On Fri, 6 Jun 2003 20:49:13 EDT
Nathan Folkman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 6/6/2003 6:03:40 PM Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hello,
when I start AOLServer on NetBSD -current it gives an error:
Ns_Tls: invalid key: 0: sould bee between 1 and 100
and
39 matches
Mail list logo
