On Fri, Aug 06, 2004 at 08:12:21AM -0400, Elizabeth Thomas wrote:
I've had a lot more success using purify when using the --disable-shared
option on both the tcl and aolserver configs (thanks to Zoran) (FWIW, I
also build tcl without the thread memory allocator so I can more
directly identify
On Tuesday 10 August 2004 08:37, Andrew Piskorski wrote:
So, can anyone suggest what sorts of errors could cause a big memory
leak which is NOT detected by Purify, and how I could check for them
in AOLserver? Or any other ways to figure out WHAT exactly is making
AOLserver steadily use more
Binding to port 8443 using the same setup that I mentioned in my first
email fixes the problems I was having with too many log entries of
this nature:
07/Aug/2004:12:56:00][27466.7176][-conn:server1::2] Debug:
SSLOp(27-0): SSL_ERROR_SSL: bytes = 16000; total = 0; rc = -1
Why would port
You are invited to accept dpbluegreen7's Address Card.dpbluegreen7's Address Card information is attached to this e-mail as a vCard. When you accept this Address Card, you will receive updated vCards from this AOL member at [EMAIL PROTECTED] whenever dpbluegreen7's information changes
First
We have been trying to find a way to use C++ instead of C in our TCL callbacks, but these all fail to load in the server:
[09/Aug/2004:09:52:10][2080.1][-main-] Error: tcl: source /export/home/foo/aolserver4.0.5_tcl8.4.4_opt/modules/tcl
This happens even when the files are pure C within a
On 2004.08.10, David Pautler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We have been trying to find a way to use C++ instead of C in our TCL
callbacks, but these all fail to load in the server:
[09/Aug/2004:09:52:10][2080.1][-main-] Error: tcl: source
That's really interesting... all I can think of is a permissions
problem, but then it wouldn't work at all.
FWIW, I've had this running since about 1 pm on Friday, so four days
now. In that time we've had 8 unexplained crashes, or an average of 2
per day. Although four of them were yesterday so
I don't know, Nate, but I made these errors go away by changing the
order of the ns_section definitions to the order described at:
http://aolserver.com/docs/admin/config-detailed.html
hth
Torben
Nathaniel Haggard wrote:
Binding to port 8443 using the same setup that I mentioned in my first
email
I use C++ in my modules nssnmp and nschartdir without any problems. I
just changed LD to g++ and
it compiled and runs okay.
Dossy Shiobara wrote:
On 2004.08.10, David Pautler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We have been trying to find a way to use C++ instead of C in our TCL
callbacks, but these all
On Tue, Aug 10, 2004 at 02:59:31PM -0400, Janine Sisk wrote:
FWIW, I've had this running since about 1 pm on Friday, so four days
now. In that time we've had 8 unexplained crashes, or an average of 2
per day. Although four of them were yesterday so you might expect it
Did you look at the
There haven't been any core files, and, well, I've never learned how to
use gdb so I wouldn't know what to look at anyway
janine
On Aug 10, 2004, at 3:52 PM, Andrew Piskorski wrote:
On Tue, Aug 10, 2004 at 02:59:31PM -0400, Janine Sisk wrote:
FWIW, I've had this running since about 1 pm on
On Tue, Aug 10, 2004 at 04:23:25PM -0400, Janine Sisk wrote:
There haven't been any core files, and, well, I've never learned how to
use gdb so I wouldn't know what to look at anyway
Using gdb to show the stack trace of a core file is easy. I generally
do it from inside Emacs: In Emacs, do
On Tue, Aug 10, 2004 at 10:19:32AM +0200, Zoran Vasiljevic wrote:
You might want to distinguish between real leaks and pure memory
consumption. Purify will report real leaks, that is, if you allocate
Well, yes. But my problem is that my memory consumption is buggy, and
I haven't been able to
My apologies for not being more reponsive; I've been very busy at NASA
these past six months. I'm getting ready to use nsopenssl for the sites
we're building here so I'll be fixing any problems you're seeing in the
next few weeks. I suspect I'm not seeing many of the errors when my
tests are
On Tue, 10 Aug 2004, Scott Goodwin wrote:
purchased two low-end intel boxes to set up a test network and run load
tests across ethernet; just waiting for two 200GB drives to arrive so I...
LOL. I like your definition of low-end. Should you find yourself with an
excess of low-end boxen, you can
Bas
The ecommerce package on OpenACS has a couple of payment gateways. I'm not aware of one to Worldpay but there is one to Barclays ePDQ which is very similar if thats any help.
Steve
On Mon, 2004-08-09 at 11:28, Bas Scheffers wrote:
Hi,
Does anyone know of a a Tcl (or AOLserver)
No problem, Scott, glad to hear you're still at it. I hope I didn't
sound like I was complaining; I was just wanting to figure out who, if
anyone, was maintaining the module.
If I can help you sort this out, just let me know.
janine
On Aug 10, 2004, at 5:28 PM, Scott Goodwin wrote:
My apologies
I guess low-end does sound a bit odd in the same sentence with 200 GB
disk drives, but they're going into 500MHz and 800MHz Dell OptiPlexes,
which can only fit one drive. I can certainly give you the 5GB and 10GB
excess disks I'm pulling out of them if you pay postage :)
/s.
On Aug 10, 2004, at
I appreciate you and others pointing these issues out so I can track
them down and fix them. Hopefully my low-end boxes will help in
identifying these problems sooner. One box will be running Gentoo
Linux, the other might be some form of *BSD.
/s.
On Aug 10, 2004, at 7:05 PM, Janine Sisk wrote:
No
19 matches
Mail list logo
