On 8 Aug 2007, at 14:08, Tom Jackson wrote:
general indications? Uhhh, I mean what is memcache, how do you use
it and why
is it useful? Otherwise, it isn't useful to me or anyone else
without a clue.
http://www.danga.com/memcached/ is brilliant. I have not used it in
AOLserver yet, though.
On 2007.08.07, John Buckman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I use AOLserver + lighthttpd on the same machine, different IPs, so
that mp3s and GIF/JPEGs are fed off lighthttpd, which is stupid and
very fast (it's wikipedia's media server)
Out of curiousity--have you benchmarked lighttpd vs. AOLserver
Op Tue, 7 Aug 2007, schreef Dossy Shiobara:
Hold on a second--define superior, please. I see absolutely no reason
to run a separate nsd process per user, giving you full process
isolation instead of this uid-juggling stuff that Apache does. With
Apache, if you want to make a server config
Tom Jackson wrote:
Jeff,
I cut out what I said, but believe me I have never made an argument that
Apache was better than AOLserver for anything other than extreme mass hosting
of cgi style applications.
If you look at the technology and underlying architecture, I don't think
it's even
Bas Scheffers wrote:
http://www.danga.com/memcached/ is brilliant. I have not used it in
AOLserver yet, though. There is a Tcl only client but for best
performance you'd probably be best off creating a module using one of
the C libraries available.
When I last tried memcached, I used the
Daniël Mantione wrote:
Ok, practical example:
We have a server, two users want to run OpenACS, and 20 users simply
wants to code PHP/MySQL. Proposal to the system administrator: Put pound
on Port 80 and have requests for the two OpenACS users redirected to their
own AOLserver process.
Now,
Dossy Shiobara wrote:
http://panoptic.com/wiki/aolserver/AOLserver_Cookbook#Server-side_Includes
I'm only half-joking here--that code I threw up on the wiki was written
and tested very, very briefly as a proof-of-concept and only handles the
include SSI tag ... it uses a registered ADP tag for
Or as an alternate answer: use apache itself as the proxy. The
poor saps who subject themselves to PHP will be happy and the OACS
users can have a real system to work with.
Are there any caching proxy plugins for aolserver? I have cheap
bandwidth in other countries, which I'd like to
Op Wed, 8 Aug 2007, schreef 'Jesus' Jeff Rogers:
Daniël Mantione wrote:
Ok, practical example:
We have a server, two users want to run OpenACS, and 20 users simply
wants to code PHP/MySQL. Proposal to the system administrator: Put pound
on Port 80 and have requests for the two
I don't think you can solve it in libmemcached, it seems to always
open and close. You can pool requests, but that would be annoying
with a page full of elements, I would say.
http://www.outoforder.cc/projects/libs/apr_memcache/ does use
configurable pooling and would be my choice for
Daniël Mantione wrote:
Again, a practical situation: How many PHP packages support such headers?
(Even OpenACS doesn't support them, so you would have to fix OpenACS too.)
Can you (socially) convince those users to rewrite the PHP apps for you to
use your OpenACS?
As a practical solution, if
Daniël Mantione schrieb:
Again, a practical situation: How many PHP packages support such headers?
(Even OpenACS doesn't support them, so you would have to fix OpenACS too.)
i am not sure, where this discussion is supposed to lead to. A couple of
years ago, i argued
here on the list to have
Op Wed, 8 Aug 2007, schreef Gustaf Neumann:
Daniël Mantione schrieb:
Again, a practical situation: How many PHP packages support such headers?
(Even OpenACS doesn't support them, so you would have to fix OpenACS
too.)
i am not sure, where this discussion is supposed to lead to. A
I predict that AOLServer will be gone within 10 years. Maybe 5 years.
People will say: It was really good software. I do not know what
happened.
It does not have to turn out that way.
This is the second time in a year or so that I have seen this
discussion on this list. It always
On Wed, Aug 08, 2007 at 08:31:00AM +0200, John Buckman wrote:
Subject: Re: [AOLSERVER] aolserver focus
as far as what lighthttpd and mathopd are doing to get better speeds,
is that they both are not multithreaded, they are just a single async
loop, serving static files. I remember that
Jeff R wrote:
Apache can start a new process with any uid/gid only through a wrapper
program, and a proxy too in the case of the worker mpm. Which is not
all that different from what aolserver would need to do if someone
wanted that functionality. suexec is AFAIU a stand-alone wrapper and
I see it on Google Code (http://code.google.com/p/nsdci/), but not on
the modules wiki
(http://panoptic.com/wiki/aolserver/Modules#Miscellaneous); I'll add it,
but wondered why it wasn't there? What's its status?
-- ReC
--
AOLserver - http://www.aolserver.com/
To Remove yourself from this
as far as what lighthttpd and mathopd are doing to get better speeds,
is that they both are not multithreaded, they are just a single async
loop, serving static files. I remember that this was an option in
Aolserver v2, but I believe it went away in v3.
Gustaf Neumann of WU-Wien patched
It hasn't been officially released or announced as of yet. Tt's in more of
an initial development release phase at the moment. Still lots of
documentation to be done. There is currently no roadmap or timeline to share
with everyone either at this time.
- n
On 8/8/07, Rick Cobb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I know it doesn't require any patches, but you can offload your image server
pretty easily, very efficiently as follows:
img src=%= $Template(gserv) %/graphics/soa-logo4.gif
height=33 width=246
Where Template(gserv) is set for each page request, obviously this could be as
simple or complex
What's nice about this model is that you can plug in external content
hosting services quite easily.
Jade
On 8/8/07, Tom Jackson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I know it doesn't require any patches, but you can offload your image
server
pretty easily, very efficiently as follows:
img src=%=
Is it used in production? Is there a plan to do any further development or
documentation for it?
Jade
On 8/8/07, Nathan Folkman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It hasn't been officially released or announced as of yet. Tt's in more
of an initial development release phase at the moment. Still lots of
A variant is used in production, although it's not exactly the same.
There's only a couple of us working on updating this code at the moment, but
I'd be more then happy to add anyone to the project who is interested in
contributing. There are a bunch of sample configuration files, which
honestly
I actually go a step further and redefine the img tag altogether (there
are other tags I modify also). In my case, I have an image database in
my system that I often make reference to in static documents and it's
nice to be able to say
img src=dbid
or
img src=img_name
I also take the
I've never replaced an html tag, but here is some code which handles typical
details of using a registered tag:
http://rmadilo.com/files/cams/tcl/cams-procs.tcl
The image tag is a good example of where certain attributes are not part of
the html standard, but are used to create the img tag.
25 matches
Mail list logo
