Don Baccus wrote:
On Apr 12, 2008, at 8:46 AM, Brett Schwarz wrote:
For *my* application, I would have the config params do the decision
almost all of the time. However, I concede that other people's use
cases may be different...so I think a hook into the compression
decision making from
On Apr 13, 2008, at 1:48 AM, 'Jesus' Jeff Rogers wrote:
Tying in with a different thread, my suggestion for an improvement
would be to ship AOLserver should with (or alongside) a standard/
sample library that is intended to be looked at and tweaked (the
standard library that ships
On 2008.04.13, Don Baccus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Or just put back the config parameters as they were, they worked fine
for everyone for a decade. I don't remember the masses shouting that
the config approach wasn't sufficient. It suddenly appeared without
discussion nor
One thing I forgot to mention was database access.
I haven't tried it at all.
There should be no reason you can't successfully and efficiently
access the ns_db interface with the existing perl tcl_api
functionality like so:
my $db = Ns::tcl_api('ns_db');
my $handle = $db-gethandle;
Hi all,
I'm very pleased to announce the first (alpha) release of nsperl2.
It's an alpha release, so no promises as to its quality. There are
*definately* memory leaks at the moment but my tests pass reliably (on
MacOS 10.5 and CentOS 4.5) so you should feel free to try it out if
you feel so
Hi all,
I'm very pleased to announce the first (alpha) release of nsperl2.
It's an alpha release, so no promises as to its quality. There are
*definately* memory leaks at the moment but my tests pass reliably (on
MacOS 10.5 and CentOS 4.5) so you should feel free to try it out if
you feel so
One thing I forgot to mention was database access.
I haven't tried it at all.
There should be no reason you can't successfully and efficiently
access the ns_db interface with the existing perl tcl_api
functionality like so:
my $db = Ns::tcl_api('ns_db');
my $handle = $db-gethandle;
On Apr 13, 2008, at 5:14 AM, Dossy Shiobara wrote:
Uh, either your memory is poor or you need to review the mailing list
archives again.
Just did, and apparently the search functionality on the archives has
a poor memory, too.
Seriously, this has been a long-standing ask, to make more
Is anyone volunteering to do this work (provided there is agreement)? If
not, this entire discussion is pointless.
Jade
On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 5:14 AM, Dossy Shiobara [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2008.04.13, Don Baccus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Or just put back the config parameters as they
I'll take a stab at it. I already have part of it changed in my sandbox. This
has escalated further than my original email, so I'll have to take a look
again, but I'm willing to try. I'll probably need some help on some things, but
I most likely will be able to do most of the work...
-
10 matches
Mail list logo
