Op Tue, 25 Oct 2011, schreef Jeff Rogers:
I'll take a swing at getting this integrated sometime soon (available time
waxes and wanes, as I'm sure it does for all of us). This patch is a bigger
piece of functionality that the others I put in; I think 4.6 is the right
target for this.
Yup,
Op Wed, 26 Oct 2011, schreef Dossy Shiobara:
Hi,
There has been little discussion or response to this matter, and the few
responses have all been in favor of moving the lists to SourceForge.
Today is the 26th, so I'd like to do the list move sometime tonight or
tomorrow. Consider this the "
ipv4 addresses, the interrest in serving ipv6 is a bit
higher.
Patch still available for download here:
http://www.freepascal.org/~daniel/aolserver-ipv6support.diff
Best regards,
Daniël Mantione
--
AOLserver - http://www.aolserver.com/
To Remove yourself from this list, simply send an email t
Op Sat, 23 Aug 2008, schreef Daniël Mantione:
Hi,
Ipv6 is becoming more important, with only only a few years of ipv4 address
space left and governments starting to require it when doing business with
them.
I'm running ipv6 myself for a while now, but my webservers are still ipv4
Hi,
Ipv6 is becoming more important, with only only a few years of ipv4
address space left and governments starting to require it when doing
business with them.
I'm running ipv6 myself for a while now, but my webservers are still ipv4
only, because they run ipv4. So, I wrote a patch, downloa
using Trac
or OpenACS
* Active AOLserver users get SVN access and can peer review and apply
patches.
* Getting SVN access shouldn't be difficult.
Daniël Mantione
--
AOLserver - http://www.aolserver.com/
To Remove yourself from this list, simply send an email to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
with the
body of "SIGNOFF AOLSERVER" in the email message. You can leave the Subject:
field of your email blank.
.com/wiki/aolserver/Ns_httpopen
http://panoptic.com/wiki/aolserver/Ns_httppost
Daniël Mantione
--
AOLserver - http://www.aolserver.com/
To Remove yourself from this list, simply send an email to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
with the
body of "SIGNOFF AOLSERVER" in the email message. You can
Op Thu, 9 Aug 2007, schreef Tom Jackson:
> On Thursday 09 August 2007 08:46, Jim Davidson wrote:
>
> > Otherwise, technically there are a few things that could be fixed to
> > solve some pain points:
> >
> > -- Close the gap between AOLserver's init framework and Tcl's package
> > framework so
Op Wed, 8 Aug 2007, schreef Gustaf Neumann:
> Daniël Mantione schrieb:
> > Again, a practical situation: How many PHP packages support such headers?
> > (Even OpenACS doesn't support them, so you would have to fix OpenACS
> > too.)
> >
> i am not sure, w
Op Wed, 8 Aug 2007, schreef 'Jesus' Jeff Rogers:
> Daniël Mantione wrote:
> > Ok, practical example:
> >
> > We have a server, two users want to run OpenACS, and 20 users simply
> > wants to code PHP/MySQL. Proposal to the system administrator: Put pound
Op Tue, 7 Aug 2007, schreef Dossy Shiobara:
> Hold on a second--define "superior," please. I see absolutely no reason
> to run a separate nsd process per user, giving you full process
> isolation instead of this uid-juggling stuff that Apache does. With
> Apache, if you want to make a server c
Op Tue, 7 Aug 2007, schreef Jeff Rogers:
> I'm not trying to be super-advocate boy here, but it just seems like everyone
> here is making arguments as to why aolserver really isn't good enough compared
> to apache and it saddens me - if the support community doesn't believe in the
> product, wha
Op Tue, 7 Aug 2007, schreef Nathan Folkman:
> You might also want to try running AOLserver without the Tcl threaded
> allocator (Zippy). You might want to try Hoard or if on Linux maybe give
> Google's TCMalloc a shot. Remember, the "Zippy" allocator is optimized for
> lock avoidance, and this c
Op Tue, 7 Aug 2007, schreef Tom Jackson:
> None of the issues listed really have a solution. The truth is that if you
> are
> doing mass hosting, you should use Apache, the memory footprint is just too
> great at some point with AOLserver because you have to load each server at
> startup. At
Op Tue, 7 Aug 2007, schreef Jeff Rogers:
> Daniël Mantione wrote:
>
> > > I think this may be more of a marketing issue than a technical one.
> > > What does
> > > apache do that aolserver doesn't?
> >
> > If have had very few situation
Op Tue, 7 Aug 2007, schreef Jeff Rogers:
> Idle curiosity - I wonder if anyone is running a system with both apache and
> aolserver listening on port 80 on different ifs/ips. Should be possible and
> not even difficult, tho probably of limited utility.
Yes, I have setups like this and is the b
Op Tue, 7 Aug 2007, schreef Jeff Rogers:
> Daniël Mantione wrote:
>
> > I think a few reasons contribute to the low popularity of AOLserver
> > * It interoperates badly with Apache. Both need port 80. While solutions
> > exits, none is ideal, and none come with "
viserver. This is a terrible waste of development recources.
Daniël Mantione
--
AOLserver - http://www.aolserver.com/
To Remove yourself from this list, simply send an email to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
with the
body of "SIGNOFF AOLSERVER" in the email message. You can leave the Subject:
field of your email blank.
ng Unix gurus
sounds much more doable than finding people experienced with AOLserver.
Daniël Mantione
--
AOLserver - http://www.aolserver.com/
To Remove yourself from this list, simply send an email to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
with the
body of "SIGNOFF AOLSERVER" in the email mes
Op Wed, 18 Oct 2006, schreef Chris Kumagai:
> Does anyone know what kind of bandwidth would be necessary?
According to the Sourceforge statistics, it is < 1MB/hour.
Daniël
--
AOLserver - http://www.aolserver.com/
To Remove yourself from this list, simply send an email to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Op Wed, 18 Oct 2006, schreef Bas Scheffers:
> That's been a sore point for a long time; one that I am trying to solve
> with Dossy's blessing. Unfortunately, having a busy project at work and
> building work going on at home hasn't sped things up. I came as far as
> preparing AOLserver for an Op
Op Wed, 6 Sep 2006, schreef Dossy Shiobara:
> On 2006.09.06, Tom Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Anyway, the code that is causing the segfault is very likely to be the
> > type of thing that you could never write a test for. And writing a
> > test right now, just to make sure it doesn't h
Op Wed, 6 Sep 2006, schreef Dossy Shiobara:
> On 2006.09.06, Rick Gutleber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > As much as it would please, however, me to be able to step through Tcl
> > code, I think Dossy is correct. You really can live without one.
>
> I think the point here is, if you force you
Op Wed, 6 Sep 2006, schreef Dossy Shiobara:
> On 2006.09.06, Daniël Mantione <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Ok, who here in this mailinglist doesn't use ns_log debugging? My pages
> > are always full of ns_log statements, and there is a tail running in
> &
Op Wed, 6 Sep 2006, schreef Dossy Shiobara:
> > Linus's rant really rubbed me the wrong way. I thought "considered
> > harmful" essays went out of vogue a few decades ago. If you'd rather
> > not use a particular tool fine, but don't imply that people who choose
> > to use it are somehow in
Op Fri, 1 Sep 2006, schreef Dossy Shiobara:
> I'm far from ready to give up on AOLserver and I'm reaching out to
> everyone to say ... if ever you wanted to help, now is the time. Share
> your thoughts and I think together, we can all make this happen.
A successfull open source project needs a
Op Mon, 3 Jul 2006, schreef dhogaza@PACIFIER.COM:
> > On 2006.07.02, Andrew Piskorski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > If all you're using MySQL (or any SQL-fronted data persistence
> > mechanism) for is key-value lookups, then something like BDB ought to
> > win because SQL parse time overhead
Op Thu, 22 Jun 2006, schreef Rick Gutleber:
> In strict C terms, "int" is supposed to be the most convenient size for the
> platform and sizeof( long ) >= sizeof( int ) >= sizeof( short ). It's my
> understanding that sizeof( int ) and sizeof( $TYPE * ) would, under most, if
> not all circums
Op Thu, 22 Jun 2006, schreef aT:
> We are using Aolserver successfully on x86_64 system . Amd opteron RHEL 3.4
> 64 bit to be more specific
I do so as well, but only after modifying the source code. The 4.0.10
source code exits if the size of a pointer does not equal the size of an
integer.
going to alienate people from AOLserver.
Also, can the problem please get documented?
Daniël Mantione
--
AOLserver - http://www.aolserver.com/
To Remove yourself from this list, simply send an email to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
with the
body of "SIGNOFF AOLSERVER" in the email messa
Op Wed, 26 Oct 2005, schreef Tom Jackson:
> On Tuesday 25 October 2005 17:32, Dossy Shiobara wrote:
> > On 2005.10.25, Tom Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Hey,
> > > Isn't running 'subst' on a user supplied variable (requested url)
> > > dangerous?
> >
> > We assume that the data in $ur
Op Thu, 20 Oct 2005, schreef Nima Mazloumi:
> Dear all,
>
> we have problems with our aolserver installation and I was wondering if
> someone could give us some insight.
> Please find the details below.
>
> Any help or comment appreciated!
>
> Thank you very much,
> Nima Mazloumi
You should
Op Thu, 6 Oct 2005, schreef Dossy Shiobara:
> I'd like to hear what people think now that the wiki is running
> MediaWiki. Will this encourage you to use it more? Less?
You should convince the Wikipedia-developers to port it to AOLServer
native; the performance of AOLServer would be a big help
On Tue, 25 May 2004, Dossy wrote:
> I'd like to start up several chats, but I'd like to judge the most
> effective medium for each chat. To that end, I'd like to poll everyone
> and find out what your preferred chat mediums are (AOL IM, MSN IM,
> Yahoo! IM, IRC, etc.).
>
> Please respond directly
On Tue, 25 May 2004, Tom Jackson wrote:
> On Tue, 2004-05-25 at 08:20, Daniël Mantione wrote:
>
> > To those unknown to the OpenACS compiler; OpenACS has its own adp parser
> > which is way more powerfull than the AOLserver adp parser.
>
> Actually the OpenACS parser doesn't exist, ATS uses ns_re
) I programmed a working tokenizer for
PHP. A parser would be a bit more work of course, but it seems the idea is
very feasible.
Greetings,
Daniël Mantione
--
AOLserver - http://www.aolserver.com/
To Remove yourself from this list, simply send an email to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> with the
body
On Fri, 21 May 2004, Dossy wrote:
> No, the point is that in the future they WILL learn and use Tcl, but in
> order to make the initial switch, they don't HAVE to start from scratch
> and spend a long time climbing the learning curve before they can feel
> really productive again.
Ok, that's a go
On Fri, 21 May 2004, Bas Scheffers wrote:
> Then they shouldn't be writing those bugs in the first place! ;-)
Sorry but this is complete nonsense and often said by people who never
used a good debugger.
> I have never used any debugging tools other than "puts" or
> System.out.println(), never ne
topic. Of course this is true; preferably I would like
to run a single webserver and simply copy php files I download into it.
Remember that we're not discussing wether different languages need to be
supported, the answer is "of course!!". Instead, we're discussing what the
position
On Fri, 21 May 2004, Dossy wrote:
> On 2004.05.21, Daniël Mantione <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The message to new users should be "Yes. You have to switch to TCL, but,
> > don't worry, we're sure you'll regret that you didn't do it before"
On Fri, 21 May 2004, Bob Woodside wrote:
> The problem here is that www.aolserver.com is just an alias for
> vhost.sourceforge.net. Since the site is actually hosted on SourceForge,
> AOL haven't got control over what Web server is used.
I know. Doesn't change that it's a huge mistake IMH
On Fri, 21 May 2004, Bernd Eidenschink wrote:
> PHP works with AOLserver, at least some folks use it. I don't know how
> well maintained the bridge ist, nor if PHP can be compiled with 4.0, but
> supporting PHP would be absolutely no harm. I would think of it as the
> honeypot. It would allow peop
ad were great and I
think their disappearance was a great loss to the community. I am in
favour of a return of OpenACS.
Just my 2 cents
Greetings,
Daniël Mantione
--
AOLserver - http://www.aolserver.com/
To Remove yourself from this list, simply send an email to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Mon, 26 Jan 2004, Jim Wilcoxson wrote:
> Are you executing your TCL stuff in a filter/trace? Or doing an
> ns_returnfile? Those are the only ways I can see where you would be
> executing TCL to affect the headers but still ending up in the
> fastpath code.
See bug-report :) I'm executing "n
0:00 /usr/sbin/httpd -f
/etc/httpd/httpd.conf
... and those are processes instead of threads; i.e. they do not share all
of their memory. It's just a normal Apache configuration, even with a few modules
removed.
Php is installed however, and it is really memory hungry.
Daniël Mantione
On Mon, 4 Nov 2002, Scott Goodwin wrote:
> Hi Daniël,
>
> Yes, this would be useful, maybe as a standard ns_* style command,
> something like an ns_bind_vars.
>
> Right now the focus is on setting up a core AOLserver team, getting
> AOLserver 3.5.0 fully documented, getting the current modules cle
On Tue, 5 Nov 2002, Simon Millward wrote:
> This sounds like your trying to create something very like what we have
> in the OpenACS i.e. the forms API and ad_page_contract. Both of which
> provide extensive and well organised facilites for doing this.
>
> Much of what goes on in the OpenACS' requ
Hello,
You have propably all build a simple a html form and a
script that processes the form. Now how do you verify your input data?
For example, you want the user to enter a number. How do you verify on the
server side that someone indeed sent a number?
Usually I use the scan command, i.e.:
se
you even don't want to limit the amount of simultaneous
requests. I think what you actually want is to decrease the priority of
the heavy user. If no one else is using the server, what's the problem?
But as soon as other users are experiencing long wait times, then you want
to take action.
Daniël Mantione
Ok, this is much better!
Daniël
On Sat, 5 Oct 2002, Kriston Rehberg wrote:
> Hello,
>
> The aolserver.com web site was moved to Source Forge
> aolserver.sourceforge.net about a year ago but this time we wanted to see if
> we could use the Source Forge project page and get out of the web publish
On Mon, 30 Sep 2002, Kriston Rehberg wrote:
> Hi! With today's release of Red Hat 8.0 there are significantly
> excellent changes to Red Hat to make life with multithreaded programs,
> like AOLserver, more convenient.
Speaking of distributions, SuSE ships AOLserver, but they allways compile
it
On Tue, 24 Sep 2002, Peter M. Jansson wrote:
> if we figured out a way to present that information using the sourceforge
> project page
You don't, just like you don't put a list of references on the front of a
book. You really need to write your own html, otherwise it will be a
horrible mess for
On Tue, 24 Sep 2002, Patrick Spence wrote:
> I put them online for myself, feel free :) http://as.ariven.com/docs/
>
> May take a day in some areas for DNS to propigate..
Great!
Now we've another problem; sites about AOLserver; nobody is unable to find
them anymore. For example, guess the Wiki
On Tue, 24 Sep 2002, Daniel P. Stasinski wrote:
> Any bookmarks to docs arent going to work. All the docs are
> available for download.
Are they going to be available on-line again? Otherwise I'll out them on
a server myself.
Daniël
Hi,
I've not been very busy with AOLserver lately, but it I just made a visit
to www.aolserver.com and to my suprise it is no more :(
What happened?
Daniël
Hello,
Is it possible to place nsvhr on the Aolserver ftp site? It is a little
bit cumbersome having to use cvs to get it...
Greetings,
Daniël Mantione
Hello,
I'm trying to compile AS on a pretty old Alpha running SuSE 6.1. It tries
to compile with -mcpu=alpha, but my GCC doesn't understand this. What can
I do about this?
Daniël Mantione
p with PROT_NONE?
Daniël Mantione
un once (500mb memory in use while 20mb is normal, no pages being
served), but other than that, it never has crashed for me.
But maybe some kind of script that checks if it is still running isn't a
bad idea.
Daniël Mantione
On Thu, 9 Aug 2001, Matias Diez wrote:
> Hi ,
> Does anybody have an example of ADP page to validate if
> one variable is numeric ?
How about:
if {[scan $possible_integer %d dummy] != 1} then {
ns_puts "Error!"
} else {
ns_puts "Ok, variable is integer."
}
Daniel
On Thu, 19 Apr 2001, Michael A. Cleverly wrote:
> Some are undoubtedly left over from the AOLserver 2.x days when Tcl 7.4
> did not have many functions that have since been added (in 7.6 & 8.x).
> There is no real reason for [ns_time] over [clock seconds], but the former
> persists for compatabil
61 matches
Mail list logo
