That's great! Do let me know when the main website is updated.
Thanks,
*तन्मय खन्ना *
*Tanmai Khanna*
On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 5:42 PM Tino Didriksen
wrote:
> This is less critical than I thought. I just re-tested all existing
> packages, and they run. So I can update the main site with
This is less critical than I thought. I just re-tested all existing
packages, and they run. So I can update the main site with existing
packages for the ones that can't currently build.
I don't know what changed, because I am quite sure they didn't previously
run. But oh well, this is good news.
Tested against v1.2.1 of apertium-spa, runinng some translations in both
pairs, and it seems working pretty well.
Ideally, we'd need to do a testvoc, but I'm not sure it's worth: what we
have now in master is probably better than whatever was last published.
Missatge de Xavi Ivars del dia dt.,
On Tue, 30 Mar 2021 at 18:58, Xavi Ivars wrote:
> I was looking into this, and I'm not sure why apertium-es-gl needs to
> depend on a specific release of spa. As far as I see, this package hasn't
> still moved to use monolingual packages, and has its own Spanish
> dictionaries, tagger, etc. Am I
-es-gl has its own dictionaries, but depends on -spa's .rlx file.
On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 11:59 AM Xavi Ivars wrote:
>
>
>
> Missatge de Tino Didriksen del dia dl., 29 de març
> 2021 a les 22:00:
>>
>> https://github.com/apertium/organisation/issues/23 is still open, and these
>>
Missatge de Tino Didriksen del dia dl., 29 de març
2021 a les 22:00:
> https://github.com/apertium/organisation/issues/23 is still open, and
> these languages/pairs need someone to sign off on current state or make a
> formal new release.
>
> * https://github.com/apertium/apertium-cym
> *
