Tobias Powalowski schrieb:
The wireless regulatory stuff has to go as well, right? What is our
upgrade path for this, as most users won't just know they need to
install the new packages (but making them a depend is not correct
either)? optdepends might work here as a warning would be shown in
Am Mon, 5 Jan 2009 13:45:11 +0100
schrieb Geoffroy Carrier geoffroy.carr...@koon.fr:
On Sun, Dec 28, 2008 at 12:51, Jan de Groot j...@jgc.homeip.net
wrote:
I have bluez in my IgnorePkg for a long time already. Bluez in
testing is a mess at this moment.
It shouldn't be anymore!
Finally
On Mon, 2009-01-05 at 18:38 +0100, Andreas Radke wrote:
Am Mon, 5 Jan 2009 13:45:11 +0100
schrieb Geoffroy Carrier geoffroy.carr...@koon.fr:
On Sun, Dec 28, 2008 at 12:51, Jan de Groot j...@jgc.homeip.net
wrote:
I have bluez in my IgnorePkg for a long time already. Bluez in
testing
On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 12:48 PM, Jan de Groot j...@jgc.homeip.net wrote:
On Mon, 2009-01-05 at 18:38 +0100, Andreas Radke wrote:
Am Mon, 5 Jan 2009 13:45:11 +0100
schrieb Geoffroy Carrier geoffroy.carr...@koon.fr:
On Sun, Dec 28, 2008 at 12:51, Jan de Groot j...@jgc.homeip.net
wrote:
I
On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 2:05 PM, Eduardo Romero k3n...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
As many of you know by now, I have been brought up to the Arch Linux
Team mostly for the Arch Linux Newsletter. Since then I have also been
interested in some packages, which I have adopted and maintained. But,
On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 2:38 AM, Thomas Bächler tho...@archlinux.org wrote:
Tobias Powalowski schrieb:
The wireless regulatory stuff has to go as well, right? What is our
upgrade path for this, as most users won't just know they need to
install the new packages (but making them a depend is not
On Sun, Dec 28, 2008 at 12:51, Jan de Groot j...@jgc.homeip.net wrote:
I have bluez in my IgnorePkg for a long time already. Bluez in testing
is a mess at this moment.
It shouldn't be anymore!
Finally started my dev job...
--
Geoffroy Carrier
On Tue, 2008-12-30 at 01:40 +0100, Thomas Bächler wrote:
This fixes the broken ext4 detection in fstype and kinit, ext4 should
now work out of the box with mkinitcpio.
It also adds a patch to build against 2.6.28. The ABI version is
unchanged, so no other packages need to be rebuilt.
Just
On Sat, Dec 6, 2008 at 2:31 AM, Eduardo Romero k3n...@gmail.com wrote:
Well, I have updated wicd quite a few times already, since I was using
it to test something in my network. I had my few share of bugs opened
for wicd, but now, they are all closed, hopefully, closed and dead. But,
well, I
2009/1/5, Vesa Kaihlavirta vpkai...@gmail.com:
I don't have too much free time at the moment, but then again I use
wicd in three laptops already. So I'll take it unless someone with
more enthusiasm comes along :)
As you don't have too much free time, I suggest to move wicd in the
community
On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 8:01 AM, Dan McGee dpmc...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 2:38 AM, Thomas Bächler tho...@archlinux.org wrote:
Tobias Powalowski schrieb:
The wireless regulatory stuff has to go as well, right? What is our
upgrade path for this, as most users won't just know
2009/1/5, Eric Bélanger snowmanisc...@gmail.com:
Both systems booted fine. Signoff both arches.
The system booted fine.
Signoff for x86_64
--
Arch Linux Developer (voidnull)
AUR Pacman Italian Translations
Microdia Developer
http://www.archlinux.it
Dan McGee schrieb:
And I'm not sure you even have to add anything to daemons at all- when
I installed these packages on my laptop, the udev rule seemed to take
care of everything and called crda all on its own.
Of course. The problem is that the kernel doesn't know what the correct
regulatory
On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 4:18 PM, Thomas Bächler tho...@archlinux.org wrote:
Dan McGee schrieb:
And I'm not sure you even have to add anything to daemons at all- when
I installed these packages on my laptop, the udev rule seemed to take
care of everything and called crda all on its own.
Of
On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 5:04 PM, tob...@justdreams.de wrote:
Hi guys (especially tpowa and JGC),
the new Kernel has GEM. Shall we try to compile xf86-video-intel-2.5.x
against it because it makes sense now and see if it creates trouble b4
we release it to core?
Just a guess.
I'd say get
On Tue, 2009-01-06 at 00:04 +0100, tob...@justdreams.de wrote:
Hi guys (especially tpowa and JGC),
the new Kernel has GEM. Shall we try to compile xf86-video-intel-2.5.x
against it because it makes sense now and see if it creates trouble b4
we release it to core?
Just a guess.
-T
Quoting Jan de Groot j...@jgc.homeip.net:
I'm running the 2.6 prerelease series for a while on my laptop now. My
first impressions:
- EXA is even slower than it was with 2.4.3
- UXA is much faster
- XAA not tested
- 3D is horribly slow
- Compiz doesn't draw window decorations due to some
17 matches
Mail list logo
