[arch-dev-public] [signoff] groff 1.20.1-1

2009-01-14 Thread Tobias Powalowski
Hi update to latest version, please signoff for both arches. greetings tpowa -- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org tp...@archlinux.org signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

[arch-dev-public] [signoff] pam-1.0.3-1

2009-01-14 Thread Tobias Powalowski
Hi update to latest version, please signoff for both arches. greetings tpowa -- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org tp...@archlinux.org signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] xfsprogs 2.10.2-1

2009-01-14 Thread Dan McGee
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 1:57 AM, Tobias Powalowski t.p...@gmx.de wrote: Am Donnerstag 25 Dezember 2008 schrieb Tobias Powalowski: Am Montag 22 Dezember 2008 schrieb Tobias Powalowski: Hi update to latest version, please signoff for both arches. greetings tpowa bump save to move in?

Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] xfsprogs 2.10.2-1

2009-01-14 Thread Paul Mattal
Dan McGee wrote: On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 1:57 AM, Tobias Powalowski t.p...@gmx.de wrote: Am Donnerstag 25 Dezember 2008 schrieb Tobias Powalowski: Am Montag 22 Dezember 2008 schrieb Tobias Powalowski: Hi update to latest version, please signoff for both arches. greetings tpowa bump save to

Re: [arch-dev-public] LZMA - in or out? ([signoff] libarchive 2.6.0)

2009-01-14 Thread Andreas Radke
Am Tue, 13 Jan 2009 18:48:11 +0100 schrieb Jan de Groot j...@jgc.homeip.net: On Tue, 2009-01-13 at 16:45 +0100, Xavier wrote: Also, if I am not mistaken, a given package is compressed only once, by the packager, but decompressed many many times (by all users). But of course the

Re: [arch-dev-public] Building in chroots

2009-01-14 Thread Aaron Griffin
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 1:07 AM, Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org wrote: Aaron Griffin wrote: On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 10:20 PM, Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org wrote: Hi, It has come to my attention that some people are not building packages in a clean chroot and others are managing the

[arch-dev-public] Integrity Check i686 14-01-2009 15:48

2009-01-14 Thread repomaint
=== = Integrity Check = === Performing integrity checks... == parsing pkgbuilds == checking mismatches == checking archs == checking dependencies == checking makedepends == checking for circular dependencies Missing Dependencies -- dbus-python

[arch-dev-public] Integrity Check x86_64 14-01-2009 15:49

2009-01-14 Thread repomaint
=== = Integrity Check = === Performing integrity checks... == parsing pkgbuilds == checking mismatches == checking archs == checking dependencies == checking makedepends == checking for circular dependencies Missing Dependencies -- dbus-python

[arch-dev-public] devlist-mailer test 14-01-2009 15:54

2009-01-14 Thread repomaint
test mail

[arch-dev-public] Broken integrity checks

2009-01-14 Thread Aaron Griffin
Sorry about the broken integrity checks, guys. They were supposed to be running weekly, but stopped somewhere and I never noticed. Thanks, Xavier, for letting me know. It should all be fixed now (I think)

[arch-dev-public] New db-scripts release

2009-01-14 Thread Aaron Griffin
Due to changes in the integrity check script, and changes to the make-sourceballs cron job (forthcoming), I'm releasing now, please let me know if there are any issues - I will fix them quickly.

[arch-dev-public] Integrity Check i686 14-01-2009

2009-01-14 Thread repomaint
== = Integrity Check i686 of core,extra = == Performing integrity checks... == parsing pkgbuilds == checking mismatches == checking archs == checking dependencies == checking makedepends == checking for circular dependencies

[arch-dev-public] Integrity Check x86_64 14-01-2009

2009-01-14 Thread repomaint
== = Integrity Check i686 of core,extra = == Performing integrity checks... == parsing pkgbuilds == checking mismatches == checking archs == checking dependencies == checking makedepends == checking for circular dependencies

Re: [arch-dev-public] Broken integrity checks

2009-01-14 Thread Aaron Griffin
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 2:55 PM, Aaron Griffin aaronmgrif...@gmail.com wrote: Sorry about the broken integrity checks, guys. They were supposed to be running weekly, but stopped somewhere and I never noticed. Thanks, Xavier, for letting me know. It should all be fixed now (I think) Well,

Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] groff 1.20.1-1

2009-01-14 Thread Eric Bélanger
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 4:28 AM, Tobias Powalowski t.p...@gmx.de wrote: Hi update to latest version, please signoff for both arches. greetings tpowa -- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org tp...@archlinux.org looks good. signoff

Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] man-pages 3.16-1

2009-01-14 Thread Eric Bélanger
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 4:12 PM, Andreas Radke a.ra...@arcor.de wrote: new upstream release. please signoff. -Andy -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. looks good. signoff both arches.

Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] pam-1.0.3-1

2009-01-14 Thread Eric Bélanger
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 4:29 AM, Tobias Powalowski t.p...@gmx.de wrote: Hi update to latest version, please signoff for both arches. greetings tpowa -- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org tp...@archlinux.org I can still login.

Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] mdadm 2.6.8

2009-01-14 Thread Eric Bélanger
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 2:58 AM, Tobias Powalowski t.p...@gmx.de wrote: Am Dienstag 30 Dezember 2008 schrieb Eric Belanger: On Thu, Dec 25, 2008 at 3:50 PM, Tobias Powalowski t.p...@gmx.de wrote: Am Dienstag 23 Dezember 2008 schrieb Tobias Powalowski: Hi update to latest version, please

Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] inetutils-1.5-1

2009-01-14 Thread Eric Bélanger
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 12:33 PM, Aaron Griffin aaronmgrif...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 10:51 AM, Eric Bélanger snowmanisc...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 3:52 PM, Jan de Groot j...@jgc.homeip.net wrote: On Wed, 2009-01-07 at 15:25 -0500, Eric Bélanger wrote: On

Re: [arch-dev-public] New db-scripts release

2009-01-14 Thread Eric Bélanger
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 4:34 PM, Aaron Griffin aaronmgrif...@gmail.com wrote: Due to changes in the integrity check script, and changes to the make-sourceballs cron job (forthcoming), I'm releasing now, please let me know if there are any issues - I will fix them quickly. I just used the new

[arch-dev-public] Core Signoff Role Call (was: [signoff] mdadm 2.6.8)

2009-01-14 Thread Dan McGee
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 4:43 PM, Eric Bélanger snowmanisc...@gmail.com wrote: BTW, I would like to take the opportunity to remind everyone to add your name to the table in the wiki [1] if you haven't done it yet so we would be able to improve the efficiency of low-usage packages signoff like

Re: [arch-dev-public] New db-scripts release

2009-01-14 Thread Aaron Griffin
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 6:45 PM, Eric Bélanger snowmanisc...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 4:34 PM, Aaron Griffin aaronmgrif...@gmail.com wrote: Due to changes in the integrity check script, and changes to the make-sourceballs cron job (forthcoming), I'm releasing now, please let

[arch-dev-public] Switch to wpa_supplicant development branch?

2009-01-14 Thread Thomas Bächler
I just tried wpa_supplicant 0.6.7. Right now we have the 0.5 (stable) branch of wpa_supplicant in our repositories. The benefit of the 0.6 branch are: - WPS support - The qt GUI has been improved a lot - Supports the nl80211 interface which can be used instead the wext driver for wireless