On 2013/6/29 Rémy Oudompheng remyoudomph...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I have started work on TeXLive 2013 packaging. I will probably use
staging temporarily if needed when releasing to [testing].
Upstream has merged the data files traditionnally packaged in
texlive-bin with the ordinary data
On Tuesday, July 02, 2013 09:15:06 Rémy Oudompheng wrote:
The packages are ready but they will tend to install /etc/texmf files
as .pacnew instead of replacing the old ones. When it happens fmtutil
will not unhappy and the things will be unusable until the user
overwrites the old files with
=== Signoff report for [testing] ===
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/
There are currently:
* 2 new packages in last 24 hours
* 0 known bad packages
* 0 packages not accepting signoffs
* 6 fully signed off packages
* 16 packages missing signoffs
* 2 packages older than 14 days
(Note:
On 07/02/2013 12:19 AM, Felix Yan wrote:
On Tuesday, July 02, 2013 09:15:06 Rémy Oudompheng wrote:
The packages are ready but they will tend to install /etc/texmf files
as .pacnew instead of replacing the old ones. When it happens fmtutil
will not unhappy and the things will be unusable until
On 2 July 2013 15:19, Felix Yan felixonm...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tuesday, July 02, 2013 09:15:06 Rémy Oudompheng wrote:
The packages are ready but they will tend to install /etc/texmf files
as .pacnew instead of replacing the old ones. When it happens fmtutil
will not unhappy and the things
On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 7:54 AM, Tobias Powalowski
tobias.powalow...@googlemail.com wrote:
Please find patches and fix those.
Hi,
I have committed the patch for r8168 on trunk.
Greetings
mtorromeo
On 2 July 2013 15:37, Massimiliano Torromeo
massimiliano.torro...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 7:54 AM, Tobias Powalowski
tobias.powalow...@googlemail.com wrote:
Please find patches and fix those.
Hi,
I have committed the patch for r8168 on trunk.
Well, push a rebuild with the
On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 2:39 PM, Evangelos Foutras
evange...@foutrelis.comwrote:
On 2 July 2013 15:37, Massimiliano Torromeo
massimiliano.torro...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 7:54 AM, Tobias Powalowski
tobias.powalow...@googlemail.com wrote:
Please find patches and fix
On 1 July 2013 18:11, Jelle van der Waa je...@vdwaa.nl wrote:
I'm having trouble building certain packages with .install files, for
example aur/vim-youcompleteme-git. If I build it with
extra-x86_64-build, I just get:
== ERROR: install file (vimdoc.install) does not exist.
I have the same
2013/7/2 Federico Cinelli cinelli.feder...@gmail.com:
On 07/02/2013 12:19 AM, Felix Yan wrote:
On Tuesday, July 02, 2013 09:15:06 Rémy Oudompheng wrote:
The packages are ready but they will tend to install /etc/texmf files
as .pacnew instead of replacing the old ones. When it happens fmtutil
On 2013/7/2 Rashif Ray Rahman sc...@archlinux.org wrote:
An official announcement is useful here because it requires user
intervention. An install message is not appropriate (i.e. not
sufficient for the problem at hand).
So, yes, if there is no other way to solve this you should post a news
Hello,
I have pushed TeXLive 2013 packages to [testing].
The main difference with the 2012 packages is that /etc/texmf files
are now in texlive-core rather than texlive-bin.
The texlive-bin package now contains almost only binaries, and
texlive-core contains all basic data files including the
On 03/07/13 07:56, Rémy Oudompheng wrote:
On 2013/7/2 Rashif Ray Rahman sc...@archlinux.org wrote:
An official announcement is useful here because it requires user
intervention. An install message is not appropriate (i.e. not
sufficient for the problem at hand).
So, yes, if there is no other
On 03/07/13 10:02, Allan McRae wrote:
On 03/07/13 07:56, Rémy Oudompheng wrote:
On 2013/7/2 Rashif Ray Rahman sc...@archlinux.org wrote:
An official announcement is useful here because it requires user
intervention. An install message is not appropriate (i.e. not
sufficient for the problem at
14 matches
Mail list logo
