[arch-dev-public] Signoff report for [testing]

=== Signoff report for [testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 6 new packages in last 24 hours * 2 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 7 fully signed off packages * 26 packages missing signoffs * 2 packages older than 14 days (Note:

Re: [arch-dev-public] Upgrading Apache to 2.4

Am 26.02.2014 19:10, schrieb Anatol Pomozov: Hi On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 10:01 AM, Alexander Rødseth rods...@gmail.com wrote: One suggestion is creating the Apache 2.4 PKGBUILD first, then talk to Jan de Groot. If he should not be interested in the endeavor, talk to another dev. Good news

Re: [arch-dev-public] Upgrading Apache to 2.4

Pierre Schmitz schreef op 27.02.2014 13:04: I did push a rebuild PHP into [staging]. I had to add a hack to keep the non-ZTS build that can only be used with the prefork MPM. For some reason PHP devs thought it would be a good idea to base a PHP compile time option on the stat of an Apache

Re: [arch-dev-public] Upgrading Apache to 2.4

Hi On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 4:43 PM, Anatol Pomozov anatol.pomo...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, One of my TU application proposals was updating apache package to 2.4. The 2.4 branch exists for 2 years, actively developed and is recommended by upstream. Taking into account that many distros moved to

Re: [arch-dev-public] nvidia 331.49

On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 09:47:46AM +0100, Sven-Hendrik Haase wrote: On February 26, 2014 9:31:03 AM CET, Ionut Biru ib...@archlinux.org wrote: hello, i'm a bit busy this days. it's kinda a minor update but it would be nice to have this bug resolved as well: