[arch-dev-public] Signoff report for [testing]

=== Signoff report for [testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 4 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 12 fully signed off packages * 268 packages missing signoffs * 2 packages older than 14 days

Re: [arch-dev-public] Dropping vi and adding vim-minimal to the installation image

Hi On Sun, Mar 29, 2015 at 8:15 AM, Evangelos Foutras evange...@foutrelis.com wrote: This was discussed about two years ago but no action was taken. The proposal is simple: - Drop the vi package from the repos - Add vim-minimal to the installation image Fine with me. Go ahead. This

[arch-dev-public] Dropping vi and adding vim-minimal to the installation image

This was discussed about two years ago but no action was taken. The proposal is simple: - Drop the vi package from the repos - Add vim-minimal to the installation image This seems like a good idea because the vi editor we ship is about 10 years old and it has never behaved correctly for me. It

Re: [arch-dev-public] Dropping vi and adding vim-minimal to the installation image

+1 given I was annoyed by vi again just yesterday (and many times before). signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [arch-dev-public] Dropping vi and adding vim-minimal to the installation image

On 29 March 2015 at 18:07, Anatol Pomozov anatol.pomo...@gmail.com wrote: Hi On Sun, Mar 29, 2015 at 8:15 AM, Evangelos Foutras evange...@foutrelis.com wrote: This was discussed about two years ago but no action was taken. The proposal is simple: - Drop the vi package from the repos -

Re: [arch-dev-public] Dropping vi and adding vim-minimal to the installation image

On 30/03/15 01:15, Evangelos Foutras wrote: This was discussed about two years ago but no action was taken. The proposal is simple: - Drop the vi package from the repos - Add vim-minimal to the installation image This seems like a good idea because the vi editor we ship is about 10