On Wed, 2016-09-28 at 21:12 +0200, Bartłomiej Piotrowski wrote:
> On 2016-09-28 05:10, Allan McRae wrote:
> >
> > The most pressing issue is #1. So lets get back to the issue of the
> > increasing amount of software requiring SSE2. How do we solve this?
>
> I thought about it, and I lean
On 2016-09-28 05:10, Allan McRae wrote:
> The most pressing issue is #1. So lets get back to the issue of the
> increasing amount of software requiring SSE2. How do we solve this?
I thought about it, and I lean toward dropping i686 completely. The only
thing that SSE2 requirement will do is
Am Wed, 28 Sep 2016 13:10:30 +1000
schrieb Allan McRae :
> It would be "simple" to add an SSE2 detection hook into the filesystem
> package that aborts any pacman transaction attempting to install a
> list of packages on i686 systems without SSE2 support. Is that a
> viable
On 06.08.2016 10:18, Florian Pritz via arch-dev-public wrote:
> [1] https://www.archlinux.org/devel/reports/long-out-of-date/
We still have tons of packages on that list. Please check if the list
includes any of your packages and either update or orphan them. You can
also check the out of date
=== Signoff report for [testing] ===
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/
There are currently:
* 4 new packages in last 24 hours
* 0 known bad packages
* 0 packages not accepting signoffs
* 4 fully signed off packages
* 17 packages missing signoffs
* 2 packages older than 14 days
(Note:
5 matches
Mail list logo