Hi all,
The results from the test-sec-flags [1] suite are in. Many thanks to
those that wrote this and those that submitted results. I'm not going
to list the summaries here, but the results show that at worst enabling
a bunch of security flags in our packages will have a <1% impact on
Warning : the repository multilib does not exist in /srv/abs/rsync/any
===
= Integrity Check x86_64 of core,extra,community,multilib =
===
Performing integrity checks...
==> parsing
= Integrity Check i686 of core,extra,community =
Performing integrity checks...
==> parsing pkgbuilds
==> parsing db files
==> checking mismatches
==> checking archs
==> checking dependencies
==>
On Thu, 20 Oct 2016 14:25:02 +0200
Florian Pritz via arch-dev-public wrote:
...
> ttoepper:
> community/x86_64/confuse
Disowned the package.
pgpGqPWvbUH05.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
=== Signoff report for [testing] ===
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/
There are currently:
* 18 new packages in last 24 hours
* 0 known bad packages
* 0 packages not accepting signoffs
* 8 fully signed off packages
* 31 packages missing signoffs
* 4 packages older than 14 days
(Note:
5 matches
Mail list logo