Re: [arch-dev-public] Shadowing i686, round 1

Hi, I have no i686 around here anymore since more than a year. If there is no real need for it anymore we should stop supporting it. greetings tpowa 2016-12-13 1:51 GMT+01:00 Gaetan Bisson : > [2016-12-12 21:51:31 +0100] Bartłomiej Piotrowski: > > In September we discussed

Re: [arch-dev-public] Shadowing i686, round 1

[2016-12-12 21:51:31 +0100] Bartłomiej Piotrowski: > In September we discussed upgrading the default -march value for > packages to include SSE2 (and possibly more instructions). I think the > general consensus was that we don't agree what we should do and we just > left the problem intact. > >

[arch-dev-public] fuse packages reorganization

Hi folks I want to give you heads up about fuse packages reorganization. fuse project had a major release recently - fuse v3 is officially out [1]. Following recommendations from the upstream project [1] I renamed package 'fuse' to 'fuse2' and added 'fuse3' package. Common files from these

Re: [arch-dev-public] Shadowing i686, round 1

On 12/12/16 at 09:51pm, Bartłomiej Piotrowski wrote: > against that architecture. No, I don't do even smoke tests – I assume > that i686 works if x86_64 does. (Don't beat me up too hard for that.) I know for sure that you are not the only one :) > I'd like to set a certain date of dropping i686

[arch-dev-public] Moving xorg-1.19.0 in testing

xorg-1.19.0 will be moved to testing, with currently two unsupported drivers, nvidia-304xx (soon dropped to unsupported) and nvidia-340xx, so feel free to block the upgrade or switch to nouveau. The following packages will also be moved to unsupported because are unmaintained upstream, really

Re: [arch-dev-public] Dropping nvidia-304xx series

Nope, I still got hardware using that. On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 4:49 PM, Bartłomiej Piotrowski wrote: > On 2016-12-12 16:35, Sven-Hendrik Haase wrote: >> +1 > > Can we also drop 340xx? > > Bartłomiej >

Re: [arch-dev-public] Dropping nvidia-304xx series

On 2016-12-12 16:35, Sven-Hendrik Haase wrote: > +1 Can we also drop 340xx? Bartłomiej signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [arch-dev-public] Dropping nvidia-304xx series

+1 On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 3:46 PM, Felix Yan wrote: > I have recently disowned nvidia-304xx as I don't own relevant hardware > anymore. Given that it's now an orphan and blocks xorg-server 1.19, I'm > planning to move it to AUR in a few days, if nobody else wants to

[arch-dev-public] Dropping nvidia-304xx series

I have recently disowned nvidia-304xx as I don't own relevant hardware anymore. Given that it's now an orphan and blocks xorg-server 1.19, I'm planning to move it to AUR in a few days, if nobody else wants to pick it up. -- Regards, Felix Yan signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital

[arch-dev-public] Signoff report for [testing]

=== Signoff report for [testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 1 new package in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 11 fully signed off packages * 37 packages missing signoffs * 14 packages older than 14 days (Note: