On 2016-12-13 14:15, Florian Pritz via arch-dev-public wrote:
> If we drop it, I'd just like to keep the possibility of us supporting
> different architectures. I believe there was interest in merging ARM
> support with our packages, but I don't know the state of that. If there
> is no second
Giancarlo Razzolini schreef op 2016-12-14 14:47:
Em dezembro 13, 2016 19:02 Jan Alexander Steffens via arch-dev-public
escreveu:
A bit +1 from me for dropping i686 sooner rather than later. The less
I
have to care about it the better.
+1 about dropping i686 support entirely. Even though
Em dezembro 13, 2016 19:02 Jan Alexander Steffens via arch-dev-public escreveu:
A bit +1 from me for dropping i686 sooner rather than later. The less I
have to care about it the better.
+1 about dropping i686 support entirely. Even though you can find working i686
hardware, specially on
=== Signoff report for [testing] ===
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/
There are currently:
* 13 new packages in last 24 hours
* 0 known bad packages
* 0 packages not accepting signoffs
* 17 fully signed off packages
* 84 packages missing signoffs
* 14 packages older than 14 days
4 matches
Mail list logo
