Re: [arch-dev-public] OpenSSL 1.1.0

On 30/01/17 08:30, Giancarlo Razzolini wrote: > Em janeiro 29, 2017 20:04 Doug Newgard escreveu: >> >> I haven't heard all that much from/about LibreSSL since shortly after >> the fork. >> Care to share what advantages it would bring, and at what cost? >> > > The cost for rebuilding everything

[arch-dev-public] Integrity Check i686: core, extra, community 30-01-2017

= Integrity Check i686 of core,extra,community = Performing integrity checks... ==> parsing pkgbuilds ==> parsing db files ==> checking mismatches ==> checking archs ==> checking dependencies ==>

Re: [arch-dev-public] OpenSSL 1.1.0

Em janeiro 29, 2017 20:04 Doug Newgard escreveu: I haven't heard all that much from/about LibreSSL since shortly after the fork. Care to share what advantages it would bring, and at what cost? The cost for rebuilding everything against OpenSSL 1.1 will probably be a big one. For LibreSSL,

Re: [arch-dev-public] OpenSSL 1.1.0

On Sun, 29 Jan 2017 21:43:18 + Giancarlo Razzolini wrote: > Em janeiro 29, 2017 18:49 Pierre Schmitz escreveu: > > Hi, > > > > I'd like to propose a migration to OpenSSL 1.1. The update comes with > > ABI and API changes. > > I don't know if it ever was

Re: [arch-dev-public] OpenSSL 1.1.0

Em janeiro 29, 2017 18:49 Pierre Schmitz escreveu: Hi, I'd like to propose a migration to OpenSSL 1.1. The update comes with ABI and API changes. I don't know if it ever was discussed, but did we ever considered LibreSSL instead? There are some distros out there using it already using, I

[arch-dev-public] OpenSSL 1.1.0

Hi, I'd like to propose a migration to OpenSSL 1.1. The update comes with ABI and API changes. Every linked packages needs to be rebuild. There will likely be broken packages. Once the protobuf* rebuild has left the [staging] repo I would like to upload a first set of OpenSSL 1.1 packages.