On Wed, 26 Aug 2020 at 01:11, Eli Schwartz via arch-dev-public
wrote:
> The information cannot be replaced and is not redundant. But it might be
> that no one actually cares about the information. On the other hand, is
> it bothersome to have it there anyway?
All right, I'm withdrawing my
On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 04:46:36PM -0400, Public mailing list for Arch Linux
development wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Aug 2020 at 15:58:40, Evangelos Foutras via arch-dev-public wrote:
> > I am not sure these serve any purpose. The maintainer line duplicates
> > information available from the archweb or
On 8/25/20 3:58 PM, Evangelos Foutras via arch-dev-public wrote:
> I am not sure these serve any purpose. The maintainer line duplicates
> information available from the archweb or aur interfaces and could
> also be outdated. The contributor lines are mostly redundant with svn
> or git history,
On Tue, Aug 25, 2020, 21:59 Evangelos Foutras via arch-dev-public <
arch-dev-public@archlinux.org> wrote:
> I am not sure these serve any purpose. The maintainer line duplicates
> information available from the archweb or aur interfaces and could
> also be outdated. The contributor lines are
On Tue, 25 Aug 2020 at 15:58:40, Evangelos Foutras via arch-dev-public wrote:
> I am not sure these serve any purpose. The maintainer line duplicates
> information available from the archweb or aur interfaces and could
> also be outdated. The contributor lines are mostly redundant with svn
> or
I am not sure these serve any purpose. The maintainer line duplicates
information available from the archweb or aur interfaces and could
also be outdated. The contributor lines are mostly redundant with svn
or git history, can take up several lines in the PKGBUILD and can
become irrelevant after
6 matches
Mail list logo
