On 11/21/20 4:52 AM, Pierre Schmitz wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> there is a new set of openssl packages in testing that are split into
> openssl, openssl-doc and openssl-perl. See
> https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/54887
As I mentioned there, I don't really see the need to make a split
package just for
On 11/21/20 11:58 AM, Filipe Laíns via arch-dev-public wrote:
> pyenv forces users to compile the Python interpreter themselves, which
> can take a long time with --enable-optimizations.
> None of the user repos available builds with optimizations, or has
> signed packages AFAIK. Of course they
On 11/21/20 11:59 AM, Filipe Laíns via arch-dev-public wrote:
> On Sat, 2020-11-21 at 16:58 +0100, Andreas Radke via arch-dev-public
> wrote:
>> Am Sat, 21 Nov 2020 14:34:24 +
>> schrieb Filipe Laíns via arch-dev-public
>> :
>>
>>
>>> Does anyone have any big issue with this? What are your
On Sat, 21 Nov 2020 20:09:12 +0100
Morten Linderud via arch-dev-public wrote:
> Yo!
>
> As a followup from the recent TU removal, I have composed a list of orphaned
> packages from arcanis. Please write back if you adopt anything else I'll drop
> packages into the AUR after some time has
On Sat, 2020-11-21 at 20:09 +0100, Morten Linderud via arch-dev-public
wrote:
> scala
Adopted.
--
Regards,
Felix Yan
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Sat, 2020-11-21 at 20:09 +0100, Morten Linderud via arch-dev-public wrote:
pymol
python-biopython
Adopted.
Filipe Laíns
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Yo!
As a followup from the recent TU removal, I have composed a list of orphaned
packages from arcanis. Please write back if you adopt anything else I'll drop
packages into the AUR after some time has passed. As of now there are no package
resigning that needs to be done.
$ pkgsearch -m arcanis
Whoops, my email client messed up the formatting :/
Here's the reply without the quotes:
Looking at some package stats for pyenv[1], we see a usage of 3,4%. I
think that is a big enough number.
pyenv does have another usage, which is managing custom Python
interpreters, which is mainly used in
On Sat, 2020-11-21 at 19:11 +0100, Bartłomiej Piotrowski via arch-dev-public
wrote:
On 21/11/2020 18.48, Filipe Laíns via arch-dev-public wrote:
> I understand that. I am not asking to put all releases of Python on
> the
> repos, only the active ones, which people are using.
I presume you can
On 21/11/2020 18.48, Filipe Laíns via arch-dev-public wrote:
> I understand that. I am not asking to put all releases of Python on the
> repos, only the active ones, which people are using.
I presume you can back it up with numbers how widely 3.7 and 3.6 are
used by Arch users. All I can see is
On Sat, 2020-11-21 at 11:24 -0600, Doug Newgard via arch-dev-public
wrote:
> On Sat, 21 Nov 2020 16:59:21 +
> Filipe Laíns via arch-dev-public
> wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 2020-11-21 at 16:58 +0100, Andreas Radke via arch-dev-
> > public
> > wrote:
> > > Am Sat, 21 Nov 2020 14:34:24 +
> > >
On Sat, 21 Nov 2020 16:59:21 +
Filipe Laíns via arch-dev-public wrote:
> On Sat, 2020-11-21 at 16:58 +0100, Andreas Radke via arch-dev-public
> wrote:
> > Am Sat, 21 Nov 2020 14:34:24 +
> > schrieb Filipe Laíns via arch-dev-public
> > :
> >
> >
> > > Does anyone have any big issue
On Sat, 2020-11-21 at 16:58 +0100, Andreas Radke via arch-dev-public
wrote:
> Am Sat, 21 Nov 2020 14:34:24 +
> schrieb Filipe Laíns via arch-dev-public
> :
>
>
> > Does anyone have any big issue with this? What are your thoughts?
> >
> > [1] https://www.python.org/downloads/
> >
> >
On Sat, 2020-11-21 at 16:59 +0100, Morten Linderud via arch-dev-public
wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 21, 2020 at 04:47:27PM +0100, David Runge wrote:
> > On 2020-11-21 14:34:24 (+), Filipe Laíns via arch-dev-public
> > wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > I want to propose adding all active Python
On Sat, Nov 21, 2020 at 04:47:27PM +0100, David Runge wrote:
> On 2020-11-21 14:34:24 (+), Filipe Laíns via arch-dev-public wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I want to propose adding all active Python versions to [community], not
> > just the latest one. This would only entail adding the interpreter
Am Sat, 21 Nov 2020 14:34:24 +
schrieb Filipe Laíns via arch-dev-public
:
> Does anyone have any big issue with this? What are your thoughts?
>
> [1] https://www.python.org/downloads/
>
> Cheers,
> Filipe Laíns
-1
Arch is yours. Whoever needs more and older releases on the system -
just
On 2020-11-21 14:34:24 (+), Filipe Laíns via arch-dev-public wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I want to propose adding all active Python versions to [community], not
> just the latest one. This would only entail adding the interpreter
> itself, no other packages.
>
> Having access to interpreters for
On Sat, 2020-11-21 at 07:51 -0700, Zach Himsel wrote:
> What would determine what the "default" python be? The latest?
>
>
> --
> Zach Himsel
> mailto://z...@himsel.net
> http://zach.himsel.net
Yep, that would stay exactly as it is right now. We would only
additionally provide interpreters (and
Hi all,
I want to propose adding all active Python versions to [community], not
just the latest one. This would only entail adding the interpreter
itself, no other packages.
Having access to interpreters for older active versions is really
helpful for Python developers. This allows them to
Hi all,
there is a new set of openssl packages in testing that are split into
openssl, openssl-doc and openssl-perl. See
https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/54887
As most users just need the library the perl dependency can be
dropped. Summing up:
Before:
openssl: depends on Perl; size: 3.6 MiB
20 matches
Mail list logo
