On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 10:59 AM, Eric Bélanger snowmanisc...@gmail.comwrote:
On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 3:55 PM, Alexander Rødseth rods...@gmail.comwrote:
There was a message on arch-general, noting that kiwi does not depend on
gtk1.
As I understand the situation, the holdups concerning
On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 3:55 PM, Alexander Rødseth rods...@gmail.comwrote:
There was a message on arch-general, noting that kiwi does not depend on
gtk1.
As I understand the situation, the holdups concerning gtk1, kdelibs3
and qt3 are now resolved, and there is a strong consensus that moving
On Sat, Apr 5, 2014 at 2:57 PM, Alexander Rødseth rods...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
2014-04-04 21:13 GMT+02:00 Eric Bélanger snowmanisc...@gmail.com:
* imlib: needed by dfm, fvwm (should be possible to compile without
depending on imlib),
Last time I check, it wasn't possible. As fvwm
On Sat, Apr 5, 2014 at 3:48 PM, Connor Behan connor.be...@gmail.com wrote:
On 05/04/14 11:57 AM, rods...@gmail.com wrote:
The only two packages I think might be worth extra concern here is:
* imlib: needed by dfm, fvwm (should be possible to compile without
depending on imlib), kuickshow
] or AUR?
Here are the packages that depends on kdelibs3 (maintained by Eric
Bélanger), together with the name of the current maintainer(s):
kleansweep, Sergej Pupykin
kovpn, Sergej Pupykin
ksniffer, Sergej Pupykin
ktechlab, Sergej Pupykin
pwmanager, Sergej Pupykin
qalculate-kde, Eric
On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 1:10 PM, Anatol Pomozov anatol.pomo...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi
On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 10:01 AM, Alexander Rødseth rods...@gmail.com
wrote:
One suggestion is creating the Apache 2.4 PKGBUILD first, then talk to
Jan de Groot.
If he should not be interested in the
On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 2:47 PM, Rashif Ray Rahman sc...@archlinux.orgwrote:
Hi folks
I'm looking for an [extra] maintainer for the following packages:
lame
I've adopted lame. You can remove yourself from maintainer list.
ddrescue
schedtool
And a [community] maintainer for these:
On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 12:18 AM, Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org wrote:
On 29/09/13 17:36, Allan McRae wrote:
All this recent talk about static libs reminded me that we added
options=(!staticlibs) to makepkg-4.1 to automatically remove them, with
the idea of enabling it by default.
My
On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 2:37 PM, Balló György ballog...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
It looks like most of our artwork packages are orphan in the official
repositories, and two of them are on the Midyear Cleanup list.
Is it OK to drop them into unsupported? Or why don't we have an
official Artwork
On Sun, Sep 29, 2013 at 3:03 PM, Alexander Rødseth rods...@gmail.comwrote:
Posting this one here as well (first posted to arch-general), as
requested by Gaetan Bisson.
In connection with the newly created TODO lists for rebuilds of
packages formerly maintained by people that are no longer
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 1:36 PM, Florian Pritz bluew...@xinu.at wrote:
Hi,
After having read the recent git thread I've come to the conclusion that
we should rework dbscripts before we start working on the package
backend (although my proposal works better with git because it uses tags).
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 4:43 PM, Rémy Oudompheng
remyoudomph...@gmail.comwrote:
Hello,
A todo list (https://www.archlinux.org/todo/replace-pil-with-pillow/)
says to replace the python-imaging package by a python2-pillow
package.
This package doesn't seem to exist anywhere. What happened?
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 9:31 PM, Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org wrote:
We discussed removing static libraries for most packages back in March [1].
Now makepkg for pacman-4.1 has an option staticlibs that automatically
removes them. Should I make that the default in our makepkg.conf?
Allan
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 9:56 PM, Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org wrote:
I'm bored of waiting... so lets do this! What a plans with regard to
[staging] in the near future? When it is free, I will kill the current
TODO list and create a new one.
I just moved the openobex rebuild to the
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 12:41 AM, Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org wrote:
On 23/05/13 00:20, Eric Bélanger wrote:
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 7:12 AM, Jan Alexander Steffens
jan.steff...@gmail.com wrote:
Greetings everypony,
Can we throw out glib 1, gtk 1 and qt3? These are seriously
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 6:02 AM, Alexander Rødseth rods...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi,
2013/5/22 Eric Bélanger snowmanisc...@gmail.com:
Well gtk is a depends for imlib wich is required by fvwm, the WM I use.
fvwm compiles without imlib and thus without gtk1
I got an email from a Gentoo dev
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 7:12 AM, Jan Alexander Steffens
jan.steff...@gmail.com wrote:
Greetings everypony,
Can we throw out glib 1, gtk 1 and qt3? These are seriously legacy
libraries.
Check pactree -rs glib and pactree -rs qt3 for dependent packages.
Cheers,
Jan
Well gtk is a depends
On Sun, May 5, 2013 at 1:15 AM, Evangelos Foutras
evange...@foutrelis.comwrote:
On 5 May 2013 01:31, Eric Bélanger snowmanisc...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm in the process of fixing kdelibs3. I notice that optipng doesn't fix
all png files. Some are still broken after running optipng on them. I
The qt3 package in the [testing] repo has some major changes. The most
important one is that it is now being installed in /usr instead of /opt/qt.
To use the qt3 binaries, you need to use the -qt3 suffix (e.g.: qmake-qt3,
moc-qt3, etc.) like it was done for the qt4 packages. The profile
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 8:22 AM, Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org wrote:
Hi,
This build was done with a chroot containing only base-devel and sudo.
Not many packages failed due to this, and can readily be fixed by adding
makedepends. So it seems the idea of reducing our build chroots down is
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 4:13 AM, Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org wrote:
On 13/02/13 19:06, Thomas Bächler wrote:
Am 13.02.2013 05:25, schrieb Allan McRae:
FAIL: iw
== ERROR: Failure while downloading iw-3.8.tar.bz2
The URL is correct and the file downloads fine for me.
I still can not
On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 1:37 PM, Tobias Powalowski
tobias.powalow...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi guys,
Those packages have conflicts on each other, sysvinit-compat is in base
group,
so shouldn't sysvinit moved to extra?
sysvinit is in a split PKGBUILD with sysvinit-tools which is a depends
for
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 10:08 AM, Andrea Scarpino and...@archlinux.org wrote:
I renamed this thread to get it more visibility.
Alexander did this list of orphans packages that can be moved to [community]:
We should only move packages to [community] if a TU is interested in
adopting them.
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 9:20 AM, Pierre Schmitz pie...@archlinux.de wrote:
Am 14.11.2012 19:22, schrieb Eric Bélanger:
FYI, the sourceball script for [community] isn't working anymore. From
the error message (below), it looks like a permission issue.
mktemp: failed to create directory via
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 2:07 PM, Florian Pritz bluew...@xinu.at wrote:
Hi,
[community] has now moved to nymeria. That means you now have a
100Mbit/s uplink and lots of disk space (1TB disks, 200GB volume for now)
Host name: nymeria.archlinux.org
User name: same as archweb login name
RSA
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 9:05 PM, Thomas Bächler tho...@archlinux.org wrote:
I discovered some new awesomeness in LVM2 (okay, not THAT new, but
still, so far unknown to me).
In our lvm2 package, I enabled lvmetad - this is a metadata caching
daemon that reacts to events from udev. I completely
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 11:31 PM, Eric Bélanger snowmanisc...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 3:27 PM, Andreas Radke andy...@archlinux.org wrote:
Am Tue, 16 Oct 2012 10:04:47 -0400
schrieb Dave Reisner d...@falconindy.com:
An an alternative, we could introduce libotr3 and do
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 9:29 PM, Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org wrote:
The rebuild list to add systemd units to packages was created on
2012-08-14 but there is still a number of packages in the repos without
them. Given these packages are effectively unmaintained, I propose we
remove them
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 3:27 PM, Andreas Radke andy...@archlinux.org wrote:
Am Tue, 16 Oct 2012 10:04:47 -0400
schrieb Dave Reisner d...@falconindy.com:
An an alternative, we could introduce libotr3 and do a rebuild for the
applications which haven't been ported (as to not hold
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 3:22 AM, Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org wrote:
Here is the current list of what packages in [core] fail to build from
SVN trunk:
licenses - source checksum issues
libusb-compat:
core.c:91:2: warning: 'enum usbi_log_level' declared inside parameter
list [enabled by
On Sat, Oct 20, 2012 at 5:06 PM, Dave Reisner d...@falconindy.com wrote:
I used to use this on a daily basis, but I now have zero use for it (and
zero ability to test it). Anyone actually use this? It's pretty low
maintenance -- I was pulling snapshots from svn/git with some bash
voodoo I left
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 9:48 AM, Tom Gundersen t...@jklm.no wrote:
Hi guys,
As the move to systemd is under way, and we will soon have packages in
our repos that require your system to be booted with systemd, I
thought this would be a good time to summarize the state of
sysvinit/initscripts
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 5:30 PM, Tom Gundersen t...@jklm.no wrote:
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 10:22 PM, Eric Bélanger snowmanisc...@gmail.com
wrote:
I'm a bit confused by this post.
I guess I should clarify my aim: As there are vocal proponents of
sysvinit who feel strongly about staying
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 6:47 AM, Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org wrote:
Here is a list of the current packages in the [core] repo that fail to
build from source. I am not opening bug reports for these, but see if
you can fix issues in your packages.
Testsuite failures:
FAIL: openldap
On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 12:46 PM, Gaetan Bisson bis...@archlinux.org wrote:
[2012-09-06 17:39:03 +0200] Florian Pritz:
The idea is to reduce the possible damage an attacker can cause if he
happens to obtain a dev's/TU's ssh key. Without a shell and only a few
whitelisted commands the box should
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 12:11 PM, Tom Gundersen t...@jklm.no wrote:
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 5:56 PM, Thomas Bächler tho...@archlinux.org wrote:
My plan:
1) Tell people to migrate to systemd.
2) Make new installations use systemd by default.
3) Stop holding back packages because of systemd.
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 10:57 AM, Stéphane Gaudreault
steph...@archlinux.org wrote:
Systemd has a overall better design than SysV, lots of useful administrative
features and provide quicker boot up. Considering that it has been around in
our repositories for some time and that it could be
Hi,
I'm orphaning sysklogd, an old logger pre-dating syslog-ng. With
systemd internal logger and syslog-ng for those who still wants text
file logs, I don't feel like adding service files to sysklogd. I'll
move it to AUR in a few days if no-one adopts it.
Eric
On Sat, Aug 4, 2012 at 7:47 AM, Tom Gundersen t...@jklm.no wrote:
Hi Thomas and Eric,
Currently our lvm support in systemd does not allow lvm on top of
encrypted devices [0]. This is easy to fix, and I added a second
service file to svn which does this. I didn't change the PKGBUILD to
ship
On Sun, Jul 29, 2012 at 12:35 PM, Stéphane Gaudreault
steph...@archlinux.org wrote:
libimobiledevice-1.1.4 is in [staging]. Please make sure to move it with
glew-1.8.0 as clementine depends on both.
Cheers,
Stéphane
I've added libimobiledevice to the TODO list so that it won't be
On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 1:21 AM, Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org wrote:
Hi all,
gcc-4.7 introduced some c++11 support, but unfortunately this resulted
in a changed ABI for files compiled with c++98/03 support and those
complied with c++11. So, if a library used c++11 but linked to a
library
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 8:20 AM, Dan McGee d...@archlinux.org wrote:
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 11:08 PM, Eric Bélanger e...@archlinux.org wrote:
Date: Wednesday, July 11, 2012 @ 00:08:20
Author: eric
Revision: 163220
upgpkg: procps-ng 3.3.3-2
Enable IPv6 privacy extensions
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 4:10 PM, Rémy Oudompheng
remyoudomph...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I am going to put Texlive 2012 packages in [testing]. Texlive 2012 is
not yet released, but it is frozen, so I do not expect changes to
these packages except to fix packaging errors.
Please try them and
On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 4:54 PM, Ionut Biru ib...@archlinux.org wrote:
On 06/24/2012 11:37 PM, Ronald van Haren wrote:
On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 10:23 PM, Ionut Biru ib...@archlinux.org wrote:
On 06/24/2012 11:10 PM, Ronald van Haren wrote:
I'd like to move 2.00 to [core] via [testing] when it
On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 7:05 AM, Ionut Biru ib...@archlinux.org wrote:
On 06/03/2012 06:52 PM, Ionut Biru wrote:
Hi,
I just pushed in staging new updates for this two packages. We are doing
this two in the same time.
bump.
there are still 42 packages that haven't been recompiled in the
On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 11:37 AM, Dan McGee dpmc...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 8:33 AM, Andreas Radke andy...@archlinux.org wrote:
You're leaving the KISS principle here. This won't make things simpler
than they are right now for some years.
Please keep our base and base-devel
On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 5:56 AM, Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org wrote:
Hi,
I am doing a local rebuild of all [core] packages to test if there are
any issues with the upcoming glibc-2.16 before it gets released. As a
baseline, I built the [core] repo using the current glibc. All failures
On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 6:50 AM, Stéphane Gaudreault
steph...@archlinux.org wrote:
Le 2012-06-01 05:56, Allan McRae a écrit :
FAIL: heirloom-mailx
make: /bin/install: Command not found
Fixed in trunk.
You might want to run archrelease to get these fix picked up by ABS,
especially if they
Hi,
In the new 3.3.3 upstream update of procps-ng, the skill and snice
utilities are no longer built by default. According to the man page:
These tools are obsolete and unportable. The command syntax is
poorly defined. Consider using the killall, pkill, and pgrep commands
instead.
I would like
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 7:44 AM, Thomas Bächler tho...@archlinux.org wrote:
Am 10.05.2012 03:28, schrieb Allan McRae:
Do we care about makedepends being in repos lower down the hierarchy?
The current Integrity Check email lists 170 issues in this category.
If these are never going to be
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 7:24 AM, Pierre Schmitz pie...@archlinux.de wrote:
Here is a news draft for the move of the php packages to [extra] which
should happen later this week. Let me know if I miss anything or how I
could improve this news item.
---
PHP has been updated to its latest major
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 8:34 AM, Dan McGee dpmc...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 8:01 PM, Eric Bélanger snowmanisc...@gmail.com
wrote:
Here's a tentative sysctl.conf : https://dev.archlinux.org/~eric/sysctl.conf
that I obtained with the help of Jan and Dave on IRC. The unusefull
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 3:03 PM, Dan McGee dpmc...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 2:00 PM, Eric Bélanger snowmanisc...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 8:34 AM, Dan McGee dpmc...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 8:01 PM, Eric Bélanger snowmanisc...@gmail.com
wrote
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 3:18 PM, Eric Bélanger snowmanisc...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 3:03 PM, Dan McGee dpmc...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 2:00 PM, Eric Bélanger snowmanisc...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 8:34 AM, Dan McGee dpmc...@gmail.com wrote
:29 AM, Eric Bélanger snowmanisc...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
The procps project didn't had any new release for a while and the
current package use a dozen of patches to fix miscellenaous things.
I'm thinking about switching to procps-ng[1]. Procps-ng is a fork of
procps by Debian, Fedora
On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 5:05 PM, Dan McGee dpmc...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 1:52 PM, Eric Bélanger snowmanisc...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 2:07 PM, Dave Reisner d...@falconindy.com wrote:
On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 08:49:56PM +0300, Evangelos Foutras wrote:
On Sat
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 4:02 PM, repoma...@archlinux.org wrote:
= Integrity Check i686 of core,extra,community =
Performing integrity checks...
== parsing pkgbuilds
== parsing db files
==
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 1:47 PM, Eric Bélanger snowmanisc...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 8:10 AM, Jan de Groot j...@jgc.homeip.net wrote:
On Thu, 19 Apr 2012 14:04:25 +0200, Florian Pritz wrote:
On 19.04.2012 10:56, Tom Gundersen wrote:
On Apr 19, 2012 10:37 AM, Thomas Bächler
Hi,
The procps project didn't had any new release for a while and the
current package use a dozen of patches to fix miscellenaous things.
I'm thinking about switching to procps-ng[1]. Procps-ng is a fork of
procps by Debian, Fedora and openSUSE. Gentoo is also using procps-ng
(although, like
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 8:10 AM, Jan de Groot j...@jgc.homeip.net wrote:
On Thu, 19 Apr 2012 14:04:25 +0200, Florian Pritz wrote:
On 19.04.2012 10:56, Tom Gundersen wrote:
On Apr 19, 2012 10:37 AM, Thomas Bächler tho...@archlinux.org wrote:
Am 18.04.2012 21:20, schrieb Eric Bélanger:
Hi
Hi,
Currently, the inetutils packages provide the old unsecure r* family
of tools. There is currently a bug report [1] asking for the removal
of rexec as it it particularly unsecure. As these things are old and I
suppose everyone has moved to more secure apps like ssh/sftp, I'm
thinking about
On Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 7:40 PM, Eric Bélanger snowmanisc...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
While trying to update mpg123, I noticed that namcap reported that the
library in the i686 package had text relocations. After reporting that
to upstream [1], it turns out to be a known issue with the assembly
On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 4:31 PM, Gaetan Bisson bis...@archlinux.org wrote:
[2012-03-17 17:37:44 +0100] Thomas Bächler:
Am 17.03.2012 09:07, schrieb Arch Website Notification:
== Incomplete signoffs for [core] (8 total) ==
* lvm2-2.02.95-1 (i686)
1/2 signoffs
We never get 2 i686
Hi,
While trying to update mpg123, I noticed that namcap reported that the
library in the i686 package had text relocations. After reporting that
to upstream [1], it turns out to be a known issue with the assembly
optimisation. The only way to remove the text relocations (apart from
not
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 1:57 PM, Pierre Schmitz pie...@archlinux.de wrote:
Hi all,
I have put openssl 1.0.1 into [testing]. This version is still ABI
compatible with previous versions and as such there was no soname bump.
However, some application have some broken runtime checks and will
On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 3:06 PM, Eric Bélanger snowmanisc...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 1:43 PM, Ionut Biru ib...@archlinux.org wrote:
On 01/18/2012 09:33 PM, Ionut Biru wrote:
On 01/18/2012 09:17 PM, Ionut Biru wrote:
Hi,
i cannot speak about libtiff but libpng 1.5 rebuild
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 1:43 PM, Ionut Biru ib...@archlinux.org wrote:
On 01/18/2012 09:33 PM, Ionut Biru wrote:
On 01/18/2012 09:17 PM, Ionut Biru wrote:
Hi,
i cannot speak about libtiff but libpng 1.5 rebuild is going to be
difficult. All previous warnings are now fatal and a lot of
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 7:40 AM, Dave Reisner d...@falconindy.com wrote:
On Jan 4, 2012 7:27 AM, Ray Rashif sc...@archlinux.org wrote:
On 3 January 2012 19:48, Ray Rashif sc...@archlinux.org wrote:
On 3 January 2012 04:20, Dave Reisner d...@falconindy.com wrote:
hydrogen: @ray: I'm getting
On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 7:25 AM, Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org wrote:
Do we want to do a mass rebuild for the packages in [extra] that are not
yet signed?
There are currently 800 packages remaining unsigned. In December,
around 20 to 30 packages were newly signed, so if we stick at that
On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 8:17 PM, Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org wrote:
On 04/01/12 05:02, Ionut Biru wrote:
On 01/03/2012 08:43 PM, Eric Bélanger wrote:
On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 7:25 AM, Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org wrote:
Do we want to do a mass rebuild for the packages in [extra
On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 2:46 AM, Ionut Biru ib...@archlinux.org wrote:
On 12/06/2011 09:27 AM, Eric Bélanger wrote:
Hi,
I just pushed an upstream update (1.7.2) for subversion in the [testing]
repo.
There should be no compatibility problems when updating from 1.6.X.
The only minor issue
On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 9:01 AM, Dan McGee dpmc...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 1:27 AM, Eric Bélanger snowmanisc...@gmail.com wrote:
I also did other minor change to the package:
- Update license, Add file depends, Add missing hook scripts, Add
python2 and ruby optdepends
Hi,
I just pushed an upstream update (1.7.2) for subversion in the [testing] repo.
There should be no compatibility problems when updating from 1.6.X.
The only minor issue is that existing working copies created with
Subversion 1.6 and earlier need to be upgraded before they can be used
with a
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 5:08 AM, Ionut Biru ib...@archlinux.org wrote:
On 11/28/2011 11:07 AM, Arch Website Notification wrote:
== New packages in [testing] in last 24 hours (22 total) ==
* kernel26-lts-2.6.32.49-1 (i686)
nvidia-lts 290.10-1 is broken with this version.
[ 17.784223]
On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 1:37 PM, Dan McGee dpmc...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 12:28 PM, Eric Bélanger snowmanisc...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 12:14 PM, Dan McGee dpmc...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 10:16 AM, Dan McGee dpmc...@gmail.com wrote:
Devs
On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 11:16 AM, Dan McGee dpmc...@gmail.com wrote:
Devs,
This seems like a good time to get the ball fully rolling on the
package signoffs page: https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/
I and a few others would like to make this the goto for signoffs-
fewer emails,
On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 4:57 PM, Tobias Powalowski
tobias.powalow...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi guys,
just orphaned these 3 programs because I don't use them since ages anymore.
I adopted k3b.
Rebuild to add signature. Please signoff.
Rebuild to add signature. Please signoff.
On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 4:53 AM, Tobias Powalowski
tobias.powalow...@googlemail.com wrote:
Am 31.10.2011 09:52, schrieb Allan McRae:
On 31/10/11 18:35, Gaetan Bisson wrote:
[2011-10-31 08:26:26 +0100] Tobias Powalowski:
Which login manager is the best then?
In my opinion: none. I use startx.
On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 9:12 AM, Pierre Schmitz pie...@archlinux.de wrote:
Hi all,
it's about time to finalize our signing policy to get all our packages
properly signed as soon as possible. Note that this is just about
signing the package itself. How we will manage our keyring and sign that
Hi,
libevent 2.0.15-1is in testing for an upstream update. Please test and signoff.
Eric
Changes in version 2.0.15-stable (12 Oct 2011)
BUGFIXES (DNS):
o DNS: add ttl for negative answers using RFC 2308 idea. (f72e8f6
Leonid Evdokimov)
o Add DNS_ERR_NODATA error code to handle empty replies.
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 6:16 PM, Eric Bélanger snowmanisc...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
bridge-utils 1.5-1 is in testing.
Changes:
- Upstream update
- Update url
- Change license: GPL2 to GPL
I don't really use this but the few tests in the source tarball seemed
to work. Please test
Hi,
bridge-utils 1.5-1 is in testing.
Changes:
- Upstream update
- Update url
- Change license: GPL2 to GPL
I don't really use this but the few tests in the source tarball seemed
to work. Please test and signoff.
Eric
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 6:16 PM, Eric Bélanger snowmanisc...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
bridge-utils 1.5-1 is in testing.
Changes:
- Upstream update
- Update url
- Change license: GPL2 to GPL
I don't really use this but the few tests in the source tarball seemed
to work. Please test
Hi,
inetutils-1.8-6 is in testing.
Changes:
- Update license to GPL3
- Set sysconfdir to /etc (close FS#26393)
Please test and signoff.
Eric
Hi,
logrotate 3.8.1-1 is in testing for an upstream update. Please test and signoff.
3.8.0 - 3.8.1
- fixed 1 memory leak in prerotateSingleLog
- another fixes for Solaris
- fixed HP-UX compilation and default config
- do not
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 1:07 PM, Tom Gundersen t...@jklm.no wrote:
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 7:00 PM, Eric Bélanger snowmanisc...@gmail.com
wrote:
It's been a while but are we doing the hostname provider idea?
I don't have a strong opinion, but the provider makes sense to me.
Especially
On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 6:39 PM, Dave Reisner d...@falconindy.com wrote:
On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 06:18:02PM -0400, Eric Bélanger wrote:
On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 5:38 PM, Dave Reisner d...@falconindy.com wrote:
On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 05:29:06PM -0400, Eric Bélanger wrote:
Hi,
Following
On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 3:26 PM, Florian Pritz bluew...@xinu.at wrote:
Hi,
A lot of people think ftp.archlinux.org is some special server and when
kernel.org was breached, I saw claims like the packages are the same as
on ftp.archlinux.org, which made me worry that some users might trust
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 8:35 AM, Tom Gundersen t...@jklm.no wrote:
Hi Eric,
Do you agree with moving mountpoint from sysvinit to util-linux? The
new implementation in util-linux uses libmount and will therefore
eventually share code with most other mount-related things.
If you agree I can
Hi,
libevent-2.0.13-1 is in testing for upstream update. Please test and signoff.
Eric
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 1:38 PM, Andreas Radke andy...@archlinux.org wrote:
Am Wed, 24 Aug 2011 22:53:55 +0200
schrieb Florian Pritz bluew...@xinu.at:
So it came up in IRC again and I'll try to sum up the discussion:
SVN checkouts tend to break, some people only use it for our repos and
not
On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 10:32 PM, Dave Reisner d...@falconindy.com wrote:
On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 10:13:45PM -0400, Eric Bélanger wrote:
Hi,
lvm2/device-mapper 2.02.88-1 are in testing for upstream update.
Please test and signoff.
Eric
I can still boot. Signoff x86_64.
dave
Bump
Hi,
Following discussions between a few of us on IRC and private emails,
we decided to remove the hostname binary from the net-tools package
and to replace it by the one from inetutils. Unlike the hostname from
coreutils, the inetutils hostname has all the functionnality of the
net-tools' one.
On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 5:38 PM, Dave Reisner d...@falconindy.com wrote:
On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 05:29:06PM -0400, Eric Bélanger wrote:
Hi,
Following discussions between a few of us on IRC and private emails,
we decided to remove the hostname binary from the net-tools package
and to replace
On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 12:53 AM, Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org wrote:
Upstream bug fix update:
* Noteworthy changes in release 3.1 (2011-08-10) [stable]
** Bug fixes
diff no longer reports spurious differences merely because two entries
in the same directory have names that compare
On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 7:29 PM, Evangelos Foutras
evange...@foutrelis.com wrote:
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 10:33 PM, Gaetan Bisson bis...@archlinux.org wrote:
Hi all,
An update to libedit lies in [testing]; it contains a bunch of fixes
from upstream. Please test and signoff.
Signoff x86_64.
On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 4:36 PM, Thomas Bächler tho...@archlinux.org wrote:
Am 14.08.2011 18:01, schrieb Rémy Oudompheng:
Hello,
netcfg 2.6.8 is released. It is a bug fix release for bugs
FS#25514 [1], FS#25473 [2], FS#25530 [3].
Please sign it off and move it to [core] when possible.
[1]
Hi,
links-2.3-1 is in testing for an upstream update. Please test and signoff.
Eric
1 - 100 of 900 matches
Mail list logo
