On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 1:17 AM, Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org wrote:
Upstream update. Includes all patches we were previously using.
Signoff both,
Signoff x86_64.
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 2:39 PM, Evangelos Foutras
evange...@foutrelis.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 3:47 AM, Dave Reisner d...@falconindy.com wrote:
I've pushed the final release of the pacman 3 series into [testing].
This is a maintenance release with the following changes:
- fix
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 2:49 AM, Tom Gundersen t...@jklm.no wrote:
Hi guys,
This removes dash from base group, and adjusts the standard
/etc/shells accordingly. This file will now be updated on
install/remove of dash.
Please test and signoff.
Signoff x86_64.
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 5:19 PM, Dave Reisner d...@falconindy.com wrote:
pacman 3.5.4-2 has been repackaged with a single extra commit:
http://projects.archlinux.org/pacman.git/commit/?h=maintid=c493eef64
Please test and signoff both arches.
Signoff x86_64.
Will libtirpc-0.2.2-2 and libgssglue-0.3-1 be moved to [core] at the
same time? If so, shouldn't they be included in this signoff?
After upgrading only pam to the version in [testing], all log in
operations fail. Upgrading libtirpc to 0.2.2-2 makes it work again.
On Sun, Aug 7, 2011 at 1:12 PM, Tobias Powalowski
tobias.powalow...@googlemail.com wrote:
Release 1.1.4
* Add vietnamese translation
* pam_namepace: Add new functionality
* pam_securetty: Honour console= kernel option, add noconsole option
* pam_limits: Add %group syntax, drop change_uid
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/08/11 15:54, Thomas Bächler wrote:
It seems somebody (Evangelos, Tobias, who else?) completely
misunderstood the compat symlink idea for a smooth upgrade path.
Compatibility is retained in a consistent way; all systems end up with
the same
On 06/08/11 09:52, Evangelos Foutras wrote:
[..]
Sorry for the OMG BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE noise; I now have PGP/MIME
enabled by default so any future signatures should come as attachments
and not inline.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On Sat, Aug 6, 2011 at 7:29 PM, Andreas Radke a.ra...@arcor.de wrote:
I'd like to add a libgraphite2 pkg replacing libgraphite because it has
its own version scheme.
That sounds like a fine use case for the epoch option.
On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 1:06 PM, Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org wrote:
Upstream update. Mainly fixes the zip file detection issues that were
already patched in the last package.
Signoff both,
Signoff x86_64.
On Sun, Jul 31, 2011 at 3:16 PM, Tom Gundersen t...@jklm.no wrote:
Sorted out post_upgrade to not print BS. Please test and signoff.
Signoff x86_64.
On Sun, Jul 31, 2011 at 2:56 AM, Tom Gundersen t...@jklm.no wrote:
Hi guys,
New udev release just out. We had the previous one in testing for a
long time without pushing it to [core] as it was believed this one was
imminent.
Nothing earth-shattering in this release. udev-acl is now disabled
On 28 July 2011 16:13, Evangelos Foutras foutre...@gmail.com wrote:
On 28 July 2011 15:46, Tom Gundersen t...@jklm.no wrote:
Hi guys,
A few more fixes has been added to initscripts, and it should now be
ready to go to [core]. Please signoff.
Signoff x86_64.
And another for i686.
On 29/07/11 16:48, Stéphane Gaudreault wrote:
Le 28 juillet 2011 11:27:18 Dan McGee a écrit :
Apparently there is a security table in addition to the
nat/mangle/raw/filter tables (FS#25272). This just adds a reset file
for that as well. Please signoff.
-Dan
Signoff x86_64
Stéphane
On 28 July 2011 15:46, Tom Gundersen t...@jklm.no wrote:
Hi guys,
A few more fixes has been added to initscripts, and it should now be
ready to go to [core]. Please signoff.
Signoff x86_64.
On 27 July 2011 13:27, Ionut Biru biru.io...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
fetched latest changes to fix ath9k_htc with linux 3.0
http://lists.debian.org/debian-kernel/2011/06/msg00622.html
please signoff
Signoff x86_64.
On 24 July 2011 11:34, Tobias Powalowski
tobias.powalow...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi guys,
first try with 3.0 kernel,
nvidia legacy is not building, due to some makefile conftest
restriction, patches are welcome.
Have fun and find issues.
One more patch [1], this time to set the default
On 27 July 2011 22:47, Pierre Schmitz pie...@archlinux.de wrote:
I'd say you may apply it once Linus has pulled this patch into his
tree.
This is not the same patch as the one Dave submitted upstream. This
patch changes the default console loglevel to 4, while Dave's patch
makes it configurable
On 26 July 2011 14:00, Tom Gundersen t...@jklm.no wrote:
What about those who manually want to set the loglevel to something else?
I don't think more than LOG_ERR verbosity is needed after rc.sysinit
takes over. One can use dmesg to review any warnings and informational
messages after the system
On 24 July 2011 20:37, Rémy Oudompheng remyoudomph...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
TeXLive 2011 has been officially released. Packages in [testing] have
been updated to reflect this.
Signoff x86_64.
On 25 July 2011 13:13, Pierre Schmitz pie...@archlinux.de wrote:
On Sun, 24 Jul 2011 10:34:35 +0200, Tobias Powalowski wrote:
Hi guys,
first try with 3.0 kernel,
nvidia legacy is not building, due to some makefile conftest
restriction, patches are welcome.
Have fun and find issues.
On 25 July 2011 15:30, Evangelos Foutras foutre...@gmail.com wrote:
I suggest we go for 3.0-ARCH; didn't notice any issues doing that [1]
on my desktop. :]
I take that back (the didn't notice any issues part, not the push
for 3.0-ARCH :p).
procps will need a small patch to not complain
On 23 July 2011 21:07, Dan McGee dpmc...@gmail.com wrote:
Upstream version bump, but much more worthy of testing due to the
initscripts getting an overhaul.
Signoff i686.
On 25 July 2011 16:26, Evangelos Foutras foutre...@gmail.com wrote:
On 25 July 2011 15:30, Evangelos Foutras foutre...@gmail.com wrote:
I suggest we go for 3.0-ARCH; didn't notice any issues doing that [1]
on my desktop. :]
I take that back (the didn't notice any issues part, not the push
Hi,
Because the upcoming kernel will be named 3.0-ARCH, I added a patch
[1] to procps to fix a wrong assumption about the kernel version
having three components.
The following page describes the issue in more detail:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=711192
Please signoff.
[1]
On 25 July 2011 23:51, Tom Gundersen t...@jklm.no wrote:
The VERBOSE parameter no longer has an effect, use the kernel's
loglevel= parameter instead. Most p
I don't like this change. While you say there's a way to make it less
verbose, after only merging the changes to rc.conf, dmesg output
On 26 July 2011 05:43, Evangelos Foutras foutre...@gmail.com wrote:
On 25 July 2011 23:51, Tom Gundersen t...@jklm.no wrote:
The VERBOSE parameter no longer has an effect, use the kernel's
loglevel= parameter instead. Most p
I don't like this change. While you say there's a way to make
On 26 July 2011 06:36, Dave Reisner d...@falconindy.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 06:26:40AM +0300, Evangelos Foutras wrote:
On 26 July 2011 05:43, Evangelos Foutras foutre...@gmail.com wrote:
On 25 July 2011 23:51, Tom Gundersen t...@jklm.no wrote:
The VERBOSE parameter no longer has
On 24 July 2011 16:09, Ray Rashif sc...@archlinux.org wrote:
On 24 July 2011 16:34, Tobias Powalowski
tobias.powalow...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi guys,
first try with 3.0 kernel,
nvidia legacy is not building, due to some makefile conftest
restriction, patches are welcome.
Have fun and find
On 21 July 2011 18:29, Dan McGee dpmc...@gmail.com wrote:
Upstream new release.
Signoff both.
On 23 July 2011 13:41, Tobias Powalowski
tobias.powalow...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi guys,
everything is prepared and committed to linux/trunk.
That was fast. :)
Now stuff to discuss before uploading to testing:
- kernel name: vmlinuz-linux or vmlinuz-ARCH
- initramfs name:
On 23 July 2011 13:41, Tobias Powalowski
tobias.powalow...@googlemail.com wrote:
anything else I missed, shout out now :)
The creation of the initramfs image symlinks needs to be moved back to
the .install scriptlet because pacman doesn't track the old images and
will refuse to replace them.
On 23 July 2011 17:48, Evangelos Foutras foutre...@gmail.com wrote:
On 23 July 2011 13:41, Tobias Powalowski
tobias.powalow...@googlemail.com wrote:
anything else I missed, shout out now :)
The creation of the initramfs image symlinks needs to be moved back to
the .install scriptlet because
On 23 July 2011 18:26, Evangelos Foutras foutre...@gmail.com wrote:
On 23 July 2011 17:48, Evangelos Foutras foutre...@gmail.com wrote:
On 23 July 2011 13:41, Tobias Powalowski
tobias.powalow...@googlemail.com wrote:
anything else I missed, shout out now :)
The creation of the initramfs
One last patch to remove the ${pkgdir} reference my previous patch
wrongly introduced from the .install scriptlet. Also made all paths
relative to / since pacman executes them from there.
http://pkgbuild.com/~foutrelis/fix-absolute-paths-in-install-scriptlet.patch
On 24 July 2011 02:37, Gaetan Bisson bis...@archlinux.org wrote:
Hi all,
I just put libedit-20110709_3.0-1 in [testing]. There are few upstream
changes: only fixes to work with newer GCC's and a couple of bug fixes.
Please test and signoff.
Signoff x86_64.
On 21 July 2011 22:55, Dan McGee dpmc...@gmail.com wrote:
My only thought is it is hard to capture commits across multiple
packages this way, or get an overall history but still drill down into
the package level without hitting the problem we had before. Yes, I
see master is still present
Hi,
The past few days I've been testing a new way to maintain the svntogit
repositories [1]. The main change is keeping a separate branch for
each package, in addition to the master branch which contains all
packages.
Currently, the log pages load very slow; waiting over a minute is not
On 18 July 2011 14:51, Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org wrote:
Upstream patch for the following bug (until 5.0.3 is release with this fix):
There is a GMP bug in mpn/generic/dcpi1_bdiv_q.c that causes incorrect
computation with extremely low probability, for unnormalised dividends. The
bug
On 11 July 2011 13:15, Tom Gundersen t...@jklm.no wrote:
Hi guys,
A new udev version is in [testing], please test and signoff.
Signoff x86_64.
On 11 July 2011 18:41, Dan McGee dpmc...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 11:38 AM, Gaetan Bisson bis...@archlinux.org wrote:
[2011-07-11 16:02:15 +0200] Thomas Bächler:
Permissions are incorrect here, should be 0666, otherwise a user cannot
access it and trigger the module
On 9 July 2011 06:36, Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org wrote:
Adds the gengtype binary (and state file) which is useful for plugins.
Otherwise, no changes.
Signoff both,
Signoff x86_64.
On 9 July 2011 16:36, Thomas Bächler tho...@archlinux.org wrote:
Upstream update, please sign off.
Signoff both.
On 9 July 2011 17:05, Thomas Bächler tho...@archlinux.org wrote:
Another bugfix release for the 0.7 series. Please sign off.
Signoff both.
On 8 July 2011 06:56, Eric Bélanger snowmanisc...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
logrotate 3.8.0-1 is in testing. Changes:
- Upstream update
- Added check function
Please test and signoff.
Signoff x86_64.
On 8 July 2011 17:37, Andreas Radke a.ra...@arcor.de wrote:
Minor upstream update. Please give signoffs.
Signoff x86_64.
On 7 July 2011 05:41, Gaetan Bisson bis...@archlinux.org wrote:
Hi all,
A minor update to dnsutils lies in [testing]. Since the code changes
concern the name daemon, it is merely a rebuild with the new toolchain.
Please test and signoff.
Signoff both.
On 4 July 2011 18:13, Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org wrote:
Big upstream update to gawk. I have been running the betas for a while so I
do not expect any real issues here. Also there is a complete test suite
pass.
Signoff both,
Signoff both.
On 1 July 2011 23:01, Andreas Radke a.ra...@arcor.de wrote:
3.7.7 has a bug and a quick upstream fix is out. This should fix
https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/24960
Please signoff again.
Signoff both.
On 30 June 2011 21:15, Thomas Bächler tho...@archlinux.org wrote:
This is a huge release and should stay in testing for a while. I want to
point out two significant changes:
1) We now have a build() function instead of an install() function - the
latter was an unfortunate conflict with the
On 28 June 2011 08:18, Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org wrote:
gcc-4.6.1-1 - upstream update.
libtool-2.4-4 - rebuild for gcc update.
Signoff both,
Signoff i686.
On 28 June 2011 18:53, Andreas Radke a.ra...@arcor.de wrote:
Upstream update. Please signoff.
Signoff x86_64.
On 27 June 2011 09:02, Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org wrote:
Reinstate an .install file for dealing with info pages.
This was removed completely back when it was noticed that we needed bash
installed to run the install script. And of course, readline is installed
before bash, so that lead
On 27 June 2011 23:10, Thomas Bächler tho...@archlinux.org wrote:
Upstream update, please sign off.
Signoff both.
On 26 June 2011 19:58, Eric Bélanger snowmanisc...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
shadow-4.1.4.3-2 is in testing.
I've updated the package to use a svn snapshot. The shadow version
(4.1.4.3) currently in the repo is just the 4.1.4.2 version that was
released 2 years ago with a security fix. Using a
On 24 June 2011 10:38, Eric Bélanger snowmanisc...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
psmisc 22.14-1 is in testing for a minor upstream update. Please test
and signoff.
Signoff x86_64.
On 17 June 2011 12:04, Tobias Powalowski
tobias.powalow...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi since removing tiacx modules from core,
do we need the firmware in core anymore?
I think that can be removed then.
+1.
On 16 June 2011 20:24, Thomas Bächler tho...@archlinux.org wrote:
Before merging the mkinitcpio 0.7 stuff from Dave, I have two more
bugfixes for you:
Sebastien Luttringer (1):
Fix detection of not compressed modules
Thomas Bächler (2):
mkinitcpio: Unset GREP_OPTIONS to avoid
On 14 June 2011 19:57, Gaetan Bisson bis...@archlinux.org wrote:
Hi all,
An update to openssh is in [testing]... Again. :|
The only change lies in /etc/pam.d/sshd where an optional entry for
pam_ck_connector.so has been added.
Please test and signoff.
Signoff both.
On 14 June 2011 04:27, Evangelos Foutras foutre...@gmail.com wrote:
On 13 June 2011 22:02, Eric Bélanger snowmanisc...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
libevent-2.0.12-1 is in testing:
- Upstream update
- Added python2 optdepends
- Added check function
The test suit passed so should be OK. Please
On 13 June 2011 14:14, Gaetan Bisson bis...@archlinux.org wrote:
Hi all,
The new openssh in [testing] fixes a regression (ssh-add fails to read
from FIFOs, see FS#24693) using a patch extracted from upstream's CVS.
Please test and signoff.
Signoff both.
On 13 June 2011 22:02, Eric Bélanger snowmanisc...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
libevent-2.0.12-1 is in testing:
- Upstream update
- Added python2 optdepends
- Added check function
The test suit passed so should be OK. Please test and signoff.
Signoff x86_64.
On 12 June 2011 17:10, Thomas Bächler tho...@archlinux.org wrote:
Dave Reisner (9):
functions: refactor auto_modules
functions: refactor all_modules
functions: refactor checked modules
mkinitcpio: use binary hashed depmod files
init: remove support for disablemodules
On 10 June 2011 18:09, Tobias Powalowski
tobias.powalow...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi guys,
please signoff 2.6.39 series for both arches.
Signoff both.
On 7 June 2011 13:18, Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org wrote:
The glibc-2.14 toolchain update is in [testing]. Here is a summary of the
changes.
glibc-2.14-1
- major version release
- add patch to fix libdl crash
Looks like the glibc update will interfere with other rebuilds (e.g.: Perl).
On 9 June 2011 00:58, Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org wrote:
On 09/06/11 07:20, Evangelos Foutras wrote:
On 7 June 2011 13:18, Allan McRaeal...@archlinux.org wrote:
The glibc-2.14 toolchain update is in [testing]. Here is a summary of
the
changes.
glibc-2.14-1
- major version release
On 9 June 2011 02:21, Evangelos Foutras foutre...@gmail.com wrote:
I guess I need to fix pidgin and mod_perl. lirc-utils appears to be
affected too. (The rest are your packages so it's intended.)
I will try to do these tomorrow in about 20-22 hours.
Decided to just do them now (pidgin
This should be moved to [core] quickly.
If you try to create a testing chroot, it will proceed to install the
'base' group. Problem is, net-tools-1.60-16 no longer belongs to that
group, but the old version (1.60-14) from [core] does. However, the
latter causes file conflicts with the latest
On 7 June 2011 19:02, Evangelos Foutras foutre...@gmail.com wrote:
This should be moved to [core] quickly.
If you try to create a testing chroot, it will proceed to install the
'base' group. Problem is, net-tools-1.60-16 no longer belongs to that
group, but the old version (1.60-14) from
On 7 June 2011 21:49, Tom Gundersen t...@jklm.no wrote:
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 6:02 PM, Evangelos Foutras foutre...@gmail.com wrote:
This should be moved to [core] quickly.
If you try to create a testing chroot, it will proceed to install the
'base' group. Problem is, net-tools-1.60-16
On 7 June 2011 23:03, Dan McGee dpmc...@gmail.com wrote:
Multiple signoffs welcome, changes:
http://projects.archlinux.org/pacman.git/plain/NEWS?id=v3.5.3
Signoff both.
On 6 June 2011 07:14, Eric Bélanger snowmanisc...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
links-2.3pre2-1 is in testing for minor upstream update. Please test
and signoff.
Signoff x86_64.
On 5 June 2011 12:48, Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org wrote:
I have pushed a new upstream snapshot that fixes a couple of bugs (FS#24407,
FS#24496) before getting into the glibc toolchain update in the next couple
of days.
No testsuite regressions.
Signoff both,
Signoff x86_64.
On 6 June 2011 12:35, Ionut Biru ib...@archlinux.org wrote:
hi,
please sign off.
Signoff x86_64.
On 5 June 2011 01:50, Tom Gundersen t...@jklm.no wrote:
A few minor issues cropped up, so we needed to update two more packages
- ypbind-mt: moved the nisdomainname config file here from net-tools,
and fix the rc script; and
- iproute2: move /usr/bin/ip to /bin/ip, and add a symlink so old
On 4 June 2011 12:48, Andreas Radke a.ra...@arcor.de wrote:
Minor fix for https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/18722.
Please give signoffs.
Signoff x86_64.
On 2 June 2011 18:28, Tom Gundersen t...@jklm.no wrote:
Hi guys,
After the discussion regarding initscripts-2011.06.1 we decided that
things would be simpler if we move all the above packages in one go
(thanks to Gaetan and Thomas for the help!), so please test and sign
off.
The net-tools
On 2 June 2011 09:52, Gaetan Bisson bis...@archlinux.org wrote:
[2011-06-02 18:26:39 +0200] Gaetan Bisson:
[2011-06-02 19:16:29 +0300] Evangelos Foutras:
The net-tools package in [testing] still ships the man page for
hostname(1), which also exists in the coreutils package (also
On 2 June 2011 10:57, Thomas Bächler tho...@archlinux.org wrote:
Complete the load-modules.sh removal. Module blacklisting/disabling now
only works with the methods Tom described for the initscripts changes.
load_modules=off is no longer supported.
Please sign off.
Signoff x86_64.
On 1 June 2011 08:49, Andreas Radke a.ra...@arcor.de wrote:
Upstream update. Please give signoffs.
Signoff x86_64.
On 27 May 2011 13:46, Gaetan Bisson bis...@archlinux.org wrote:
Dear all,
A new dnsutils package is in [testing], but the upstream code changes
only affect our bind package. So, in essence, the only thing that makes
this dnsutils different from the previous one is that it was build with
the
On 28 May 2011 20:22, Thomas Bächler tho...@archlinux.org wrote:
This update adds an initramfs-only udev rule for device-mapper. Without
this rule, there are weird bugs in udev rules related to device-mapper
devices. I knew this rule was necessary, but I hadn't seen any real bug
caused by this
On 26 May 2011 08:53, Tobias Powalowski t.p...@gmx.de wrote:
Am Dienstag 24 Mai 2011 schrieb Evangelos Foutras:
On 24 May 2011 22:03, Tobias Powalowski t.p...@gmx.de wrote:
Upstream update. This package is NOT in testing (2.6.39 currently
resides there), but at:
http://dev.archlinux.org
On 27 May 2011 15:12, Tom Gundersen t...@jklm.no wrote:
Hi guys,
udev-171 is now out and moved to testing.
udev-170 stayed in testing for one week, and my removal of some of our
custom rules revealed an upstream bug. This has now been fixed
upstream, so 171 should be ready to move to core.
On 26 May 2011 17:18, Stéphane Gaudreault steph...@archlinux.org wrote:
* A system-wide lesskey file may be put into /etc/sysless (fix FS#24449)
Please signoff both.
Signoff x86_64.
2011/5/22 Ángel Velásquez an...@archlinux.org:
Hi DEVs TUs,
Perl 5.14.0 hits [staging] today, so, a rebuild is needed for
compatibility with 5.14.0.
A TODO list is created on [1]
I am currently uploading rebuilt packages of the following:
claws-mail-extra-plugins
dvdrip
git
glade-perl
On 24 May 2011 22:03, Tobias Powalowski t.p...@gmx.de wrote:
Upstream update. This package is NOT in testing (2.6.39 currently
resides there), but at:
http://dev.archlinux.org/~tpowa/kernel26/
please signoff for both arches.
Signoff x86_64.
On 25 May 2011 00:49, Eric Bélanger snowmanisc...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
sudo 1.8.1p2 is in testing for an upstream update.
Signoff i686.
On 25 May 2011 03:52, Evangelos Foutras foutre...@gmail.com wrote:
On 25 May 2011 00:49, Eric Bélanger snowmanisc...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
sudo 1.8.1p2 is in testing for an upstream update.
Signoff i686.
And another one for x86_64.
On 21 May 2011 20:51, Pierre Schmitz pie...@archlinux.de wrote:
Hi all,
here is a minor update for xz. Please sign off.
Signoff x86_64.
On 21 May 2011 10:58, Ionut Biru ib...@archlinux.org wrote:
Hi,
please signoff
Signoff x86_64.
On 19 May 2011 19:11, Tom Gundersen t...@jklm.no wrote:
Hi guys,
This is an upstream update together with the following changes:
No signoff because udev 170 has been released with the following NEWS addition:
-
Fix bug in control message handling, which can lead to a failing
udevadm
On 19 May 2011 22:37, Andreas Radke a.ra...@arcor.de wrote:
Minor upstream release. Please give signoffs.
Signoff x86_64.
On 16 May 2011 08:45, Tobias Powalowski t.p...@gmx.de wrote:
Hi
minor patch added which fixed mount -a segfault.
Signoff x86_64.
On 15 May 2011 22:21, Tobias Powalowski t.p...@gmx.de wrote:
Please signoff both arches,
Signoff x86_64.
On 16 May 2011 15:05, Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org wrote:
Signoff both,
Signoff x86_64.
On 16 May 2011 15:04, Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org wrote:
Signoff both,
Signoff x86_64.
(I only tested it by building wireshark which has bison in its build
dependencies. It went okay. :p)
On 14 May 2011 12:01, Thomas Bächler tho...@archlinux.org wrote:
Upstream update, please sign off.
Signoff i686.
On 14 May 2011 14:32, Thomas Bächler tho...@archlinux.org wrote:
Upstream busybox update, please sign off.
Signoff x86_64.
On 14 May 2011 12:03, Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org wrote:
New upstream snapshot. Fixes some template code issues (FS#24142)
Signoff both,
Signoff both.
201 - 300 of 316 matches
Mail list logo
