x86_64
--
Pierre Schmitz, http://pierre-schmitz.com
: https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/27743
--
Pierre Schmitz, http://pierre-schmitz.com
guess that a couple of days is fine if that is fixed too.
Font rendering is still broken with the final version of Qt 4.8. Both
upstream bug reports are still open.
--
Pierre Schmitz, http://pierre-schmitz.com
point to this in an
announcement as we did many times before. We still aim for competent
users so avoid user intervention at all costs is not our way;
especially if the straight forward solution is that easy.
Greetings,
Pierre
--
Pierre Schmitz, http://pierre-schmitz.com
key.
username on gerolde is pierre; on sigurd it is pschmitz
2) name at least one package you already signed.
See for example openssl in [core] and devtools in [extra]
Greetings,
Pierre
--
Pierre Schmitz, http://pierre-schmitz.com
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
MIME-Version
):
https://users.archlinux.de/~pierre/tmp/sigs.png
Greetings,
Pierre
--
Pierre Schmitz, http://pierre-schmitz.com
Am 23.11.2011 20:13, schrieb Dan McGee:
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 10:12 AM, Pierre Schmitz pie...@archlinux.de wrote:
Hi all,
here is a little status update. So far I have issued 67 signatures in
total for 36 Developers and Trusted Users. 10 people haven't reported
back and another 11 haven't
the mail entered into your archweb profile. If you didn't receive
such a mail please contact me.
Greetings,
Pierre
--
Pierre Schmitz, http://pierre-schmitz.com
hi all,
there is a simple rebuild waiting for signoffs in testing. As this
packages does not have a single signoff since two weeks I am calling out
to everybody (Dev, TU and users) using it. Just let me know if the
package still does its intended job.
Greetings,
Pierre
--
Pierre Schmitz, http
as-is. This is esp. the case for beta software or
release candidates.
So right, if the release of Qt 4.8 is unknown we might be better off to
revert this changes or move them to kde-unstable which is depends on
testing anyway.
--
Pierre Schmitz, http://pierre-schmitz.com
updated the db files for all packages that did not have
their gpg signature included. This means that pacman should now be able
to verify all signed packages. ATM 51% of our packages are signed.
Greetings,
Pierre
--
Pierre Schmitz, http://pierre-schmitz.com
Hi all,
I have rebuild these old firmware packages. The only difference is that
they are signed now. I don't expect that a lot of you use these hardware
so it's probably fine to just check that the package's content is
identical to those in core.
Greetings,
Pierre
--
Pierre Schmitz, http
96.6800%
gzip340 3.3100%
signed 460944.9700%
Greetings,
Pierre
--
Pierre Schmitz, http://pierre-schmitz.com
Am 31.10.2011 22:27, schrieb Thomas Bächler:
Compared to the last release, a few bugfixes:
Fix FS#19234, FS#26674, FS#25939, FS#26528 and a wrong drm error.
Please sign off.
signoff x86_64
--
Pierre Schmitz, http://pierre-schmitz.com
.
Greetings,
Pierre
--
Pierre Schmitz, http://pierre-schmitz.com
have. It's also not useful to introduce it for just one lib. It's
probably needed for the whole dependency subtree of a package. I hope
this explanation will do for now :-)
Greetings,
Pierre
--
Pierre Schmitz, http://pierre-schmitz.com
.
This means that from now on no new packages can be uploaded that don't
have a signature. We may give the TU a ew days mroe time as this will be
new to them.
If you just agree with all this send a +1.
Greetings,
Pierre
--
Pierre Schmitz, http://pierre-schmitz.com
: the build server with
that much people having root access is quite a problem anyway.
Also if you don't even download (and install) some your own packages,
maybe a better solution would be to find someone else to maintain them.
Greetings,
Pierre
--
Pierre Schmitz, http://pierre-schmitz.com
known?
It holds back the LibreOffice build in staging and probably more.
I am on it. Is it only about the ca-certificates package? I can fix it
right away if needed.
--
Pierre Schmitz, http://pierre-schmitz.com
--
Pierre Schmitz, http://pierre-schmitz.com
.
Greetings,
Pierre
--
Pierre Schmitz, https://users.archlinux.de/~pierre
Am 14.10.2011 14:43, schrieb Dan McGee:
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 12:45 AM, Pierre Schmitz pie...@archlinux.de wrote:
Am 14.10.2011 07:34, schrieb Allan McRae:
On 14/10/11 15:10, Pierre Schmitz wrote:
I just noticed a somehow unexpected behavior: When I run pacman -S
devtools (still had namcap
But should be easy enough to port if even necessary.
Greetings,
Pierre
--
Pierre Schmitz, https://users.archlinux.de/~pierre
SyncFirst option has no effect in this case?
--
Pierre Schmitz, https://users.archlinux.de/~pierre
Am 14.10.2011 07:34, schrieb Allan McRae:
On 14/10/11 15:10, Pierre Schmitz wrote:
I just noticed a somehow unexpected behavior: When I run pacman -S
devtools (still had namcap version 3.1) pacman wanted to install these
pacakges:
namcap-3.1-1 pacman-3.5.4-4 pyalpm-0.4.3-1 subversion
a reminder.
To clarify:
ftp.archlinux.org is just a mirror and not directly managed by us. It's
is also not a tier 1 miror as no other mirrors sync from it. As Eric
pointed out this is also a complete mirror which might include things
which might not be found on other mirrors.
Pierre
--
Pierre Schmitz
Hi all,
this is a simple rebuild of an old package. Please sign off.
Greetings,
Pierre
--
Pierre Schmitz, https://users.archlinux.de/~pierre
Hi,
this is another simple rebuild of an old package. Note that I reverted
the changes in trunk which already had version 2.0 which we will most
likely skip due to problems.
Please signoff,
Pierre
--
Pierre Schmitz, https://users.archlinux.de/~pierre
that the numbers bc calculated don't really add up to
100% :-)
--
Pierre Schmitz, https://users.archlinux.de/~pierre
On Tue, 30 Aug 2011 22:24:33 +0200, Pierre Schmitz wrote:
Hi all,
there was another incident with a CA. See
http://blog.mozilla.com/security/2011/08/29/fraudulent-google-com-certificate/
for more details. If you like to distrust this issuer you'll find a
howto for Firefox at
http
to
a typo in the redhat package file. Since the pkgver wasn't bumped, I
incremented the pkgrel.
So please test and signoff (again) on openssh-5.9p1-3 from [testing].
Cheers.
signoff x86_64
--
Pierre Schmitz, https://users.archlinux.de/~pierre
Hi,
this is a new upstream update including two security related fixes. See
http://openssl.org/news/secadv_20110906.txt for details.
Please sign off,
Pierre
--
Pierre Schmitz, https://users.archlinux.de/~pierre
Hi all,
in this new certificate package the DigiNotar certificate was removed
(see the my other mail about that issue)
Please sign off,
Pierre
--
Pierre Schmitz, https://users.archlinux.de/~pierre
need to wait for the next bug fix
release of xorg-server:
http://www.nvnews.net/vbulletin/showpost.php?p=2473628postcount=4
--
Pierre Schmitz, https://users.archlinux.de/~pierre
.
Blindly shipping a bunch of certificates to our users does not seem to
be the best idea any more. Unfortunately there is no real alternative
atm.
Greetings,
Pierre
--
Pierre Schmitz, https://users.archlinux.de/~pierre
Hi,
this is n updated package of run-parts (used by e.g. cronie and
ca-certificates). The major version bump is not that exiting as no
source code was changed. So this is more a maintenance rebuild. I also
added the translated man pages.
Please sign off,
Pierre
--
Pierre Schmitz, https
On Mon, 22 Aug 2011 21:40:28 +1000, Allan McRae wrote:
Upstrema patch to fix some regex parsing issues (FS#25637, FS#25711).
Signoff both,
Allan
signoff x86_64
--
Pierre Schmitz, https://users.archlinux.de/~pierre
On Sun, 21 Aug 2011 15:27:33 +1000, Allan McRae wrote:
Minor upstream bug fix release.
Signoff both,
Allan
signoff both
--
Pierre Schmitz, https://users.archlinux.de/~pierre
libmpc-0.9-2
mpfr-3.0.1.p4-2
ppl-0.11.2-2
zlib-1.2.5-4
linux-api-headers-3.0.1-1 (upstream update)
binutils-2.21.1-2
gcc{,-libs}-4.6.1-3 (do not build libssp with hardening flags)
glibc-2.14-5 (do not build libraries with hardening flags)
Signoff both,
Allan
signoff both
--
Pierre
://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/gitweb/?p=php-pear.git;a=blob;f=php-pear.spec
Greetings,
Pierre
*) https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=18568
http://pear.php.net/bugs/bug.php?id=6154
https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=50509
https://pear.php.net/bugs/bug.php?id=17067
--
Pierre Schmitz, https://users.archlinux.de
On Thu, 18 Aug 2011 16:32:15 +0200, Pierre Schmitz wrote:
Hi all,
The recent PHP 5.3.7 packages will be shipped without the Suhosin patch
and there also wont be a PEAR package.
While I like the suhosin project I have to assume that this is stalled
at best. There are no new releases since
.
--
Pierre Schmitz, https://users.archlinux.de/~pierre
On Sun, 14 Aug 2011 01:32:49 +0200, Thomas Bächler wrote:
Upstream update, also enable md5sum, sha1sum, sha256sum and sha512sum.
Please sign off.
signoff x86_64
--
Pierre Schmitz, https://users.archlinux.de/~pierre
. We might also rethink if supporting these ancient
protocols in kernel and user space tool is still needed.
For those who want to prevent these modules from being loaded use this
modprobe.conf entries:
alias net-pf-4 off
alias net-pf-5 off
Greetings,
Pierre
--
Pierre Schmitz, https
On Mon, 8 Aug 2011 20:59:26 +0200, Ronald van Haren wrote:
A quick signoff for this please.
0.97-20 fixes FS#25442 (grub-install broken on i686). Also adds a
check for xfs /boot partition around the xfs_freeze commands.
Ronald
signoff i686; tested in virtualbox.
--
Pierre Schmitz, https
it to AUR or
you maintain it in extra if you want to keep archboot depending on it.
--
Pierre Schmitz, https://users.archlinux.de/~pierre
On Sat, 06 Aug 2011 17:58:53 +0200, Thomas Bächler wrote:
Hi,
please signoff the 3.0 series for both architectures.
Signing off for x86_64 (two machines) and i686 (virtualbox; updated
from core to testing here)
--
Pierre Schmitz, https://users.archlinux.de/~pierre
On Tue, 02 Aug 2011 17:30:52 +0300, Ionut Biru wrote:
Hi,
changed name for linux and initrd image for linux 3.0 in the
configuration file.
This package should be moved in the same time with linux 3.0.
please signoff
signoff x86_64
--
Pierre Schmitz, https://users.archlinux.de/~pierre
On Mon, 01 Aug 2011 20:09:21 +0200, Tobias Powalowski wrote:
Hi guys,
please signoff 3.0 series for both arches.
signoff x86_64
--
Pierre Schmitz, https://users.archlinux.de/~pierre
this in rc.sysinit.
-t
Shall I apply this now or is the rule, don't change upstream here?
greetings
tpowa
I'd say you may apply it once Linus has pulled this patch into his
tree.
--
Pierre Schmitz, https://users.archlinux.de/~pierre
instead of 3.0-ARCH.
This means external modules like nvidia etc. need to be rebuilt on every
minor kernel update. But we would need to check if tools would accept a
short version like 3.0 if we want to change that.
Greetings,
Pierre
--
Pierre Schmitz, https://users.archlinux.de/~pierre
On Thu, 21 Jul 2011 10:29:15 -0500, Dan McGee wrote:
Upstream new release.
-Dan
Imho the base group could be removed as it is not needed by anything.
--
Pierre Schmitz, https://users.archlinux.de/~pierre
On Sat, 23 Jul 2011 14:15:14 +0300, Evangelos Foutras wrote:
I much prefer the $pkgname suffix instead of 'ARCH' in the kernel and
initramfs images. It looks nicer, and (as you said) it's easier to
customize too.
I agree.
--
Pierre Schmitz, https://users.archlinux.de/~pierre
.
Greetings,
Pierre
--
Pierre Schmitz, https://users.archlinux.de/~pierre
On Sun, 5 Jun 2011 12:17:57 +0200, Andreas Radke wrote:
All rebuilt packages have been moved to testing. Please report if
anything went broken.
-Andy
The php packages weren't moved to extra (did that now). Note that split
packages are moved by using their base name.
--
Pierre Schmitz
- 1.6.16 : http://svn.haxx.se/dev/archive-2011-03/0122.shtml
You'll need to add sqlite3 as dependency. See
https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/24250 No idea why namcap does not report
this issue.
--
Pierre Schmitz, https://users.archlinux.de/~pierre
correctly use egrep and fgrep instead of grep.
* French translation was added.
Greetings,
Pierre
--
Pierre Schmitz, https://users.archlinux.de/~pierre
On Thu, 18 Nov 2010 13:16:52 +0100, Pierre Schmitz wrote:
Hi all,
just to let you know: I have moved isos from 2008 and older to our
archives. They are of no use and recently we found out that at least one
tier1 mirror had excluded them which caused some broken symlinks.
Greetings
On Fri, 22 Apr 2011 11:02:15 +0300, Ionut Biru wrote:
Hi,
please signoff
sign off x86_64
--
Pierre Schmitz, https://users.archlinux.de/~pierre
. ;-)
--
Pierre Schmitz, https://users.archlinux.de/~pierre
On Tue, 03 May 2011 16:04:35 +1000, Allan McRae wrote:
On 01/05/11 21:22, Pierre Schmitz wrote:
Hi all,
there are new packages for ca-certificates, run-parts and
ca-certificates-java in testing. The certificates were updated to be in
sync with mozilla. The ca-certificates-java package has
to extra then?
Greetings,
Pierre
--
Pierre Schmitz, https://users.archlinux.de/~pierre
this will be fixed by the then updated
ca-certificates-java. There is no user interaction needed though and new
installs should be fine.
So, please sign off. :-)
Greetings,
Pierre
--
Pierre Schmitz, https://users.archlinux.de/~pierre
packages? If not it might be
easier to revert this rebuild for now and wait until everything is
compatible. ATM readland and redland-compat cannot be installed at the
same time due to filename conflicts.
--
Pierre Schmitz, https://users.archlinux.de/~pierre
-video-intel + nvidia-utils on one system?
Is this Optimus? Afaik you cannot use these on Linux.
--
Pierre Schmitz, https://users.archlinux.de/~pierre
Just to let you know: I have removed the nvidia-173xx driver packages
from [extra]. They wont work with current xorg-server anyway. Once
nvidia releases a new driver these can be readded easily. Keeping a
package that cannot work is kind of pointless.
Greetings,
Pierre
--
Pierre Schmitz, https
package.
Greetings,
Pierre
--
Pierre Schmitz, https://users.archlinux.de/~pierre
On Wed, 13 Apr 2011 17:06:52 +0100, Pierre Schmitz wrote:
Hi all,
is there anyone who wants to maintain this package in [multilib]. It's
e.g. needed by the recent Humble Bundle games. Ideally it would be
maintained by those who also maintain other gtk packages. If nobody can
be found I
On Wed, 13 Apr 2011 16:54:40 +0100, Pierre Schmitz wrote:
Just to let you know: I have removed the nvidia-173xx driver packages
from [extra]. They wont work with current xorg-server anyway. Once
nvidia releases a new driver these can be readded easily. Keeping a
package that cannot work
.
Greetings,
Pierre
--
Pierre Schmitz, https://users.archlinux.de/~pierre
else let
me know.
Ionut pointed out that libnl has been bumped to version 2.0 in trunk
which was not compatible with networkmanager in the end. So trunk should
be overwritten by core at first here
Greetings,
Pierre
--
Pierre Schmitz, https://users.archlinux.de/~pierre
xz compressed
- NUMA is enabled on x86_64
- AUTOSCHED (aka the wonder patch) is enabled
- aufs2.1 latest snapshot
- added additional i915 patch
- added radeaon kms fix
greetings
tpowa
sign off for x86_64.
--
Pierre Schmitz, https://users.archlinux.de/~pierre
.
I have added a simple test and pushed this patch. There is also a new
config var called REQUIRE_SIGNATURE which wont accept new packages if a
.sig file is not available. See
http://projects.archlinux.org/dbscripts.git/commit/?id=1ce0c6368d0908e25f9bd1bb8183b5f29053fac8
--
Pierre Schmitz, https
to compress the
file due to it already having the suffix .foo. It was already
documented on the man page, but the code lacked the test.
* xzgrep -l foo bar.xz works now.
* Polish translation was added.
--
Pierre Schmitz, https://users.archlinux.de/~pierre
/$repo/${pkgfile##*/} || abort
Are you sure that this will work? Looks like your are having two source
files and one target that is also a file.
--
Pierre Schmitz, https://users.archlinux.de/~pierre
.
I am a little confused by this patch. If I get the current repo-add
code right, gpg signatures will be base64 encoded and added to the db
files. So there should be no need to provide .sig files for every single
package.
--
Pierre Schmitz, https://users.archlinux.de/~pierre
. But pretty printing is a
bad reason. I don't have a better idea right now.
If we are optimizing we should try to use one rsync call to upload all
packages at once. If pretty printing is a show stopper here just remove
it.
--
Pierre Schmitz, https://users.archlinux.de/~pierre
On Fri, 1 Apr 2011 21:54:30 +0200, Rémy Oudompheng wrote:
On 2011/4/1 Pierre Schmitz pie...@archlinux.de wrote:
On Fri, 1 Apr 2011 00:54:57 +0200, Rémy Oudompheng wrote:
Signature files are optional and the previous behaviour
is unchanged when signatures files do not exist.
Signed-off
,sys,tarfile,alpm
ImportError: libalpm.so.5: cannot open shared object file: No such file or
directory
OK, I am on it.
--
Pierre Schmitz, https://users.archlinux.de/~pierre
On Fri, 1 Apr 2011 15:10:36 -0500, Dan McGee wrote:
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 2:58 PM, Pierre Schmitz pie...@archlinux.de wrote:
On Fri, 1 Apr 2011 21:54:30 +0200, Rémy Oudompheng wrote:
In my current understanding:
* package pool holds packages and their signature files, and serves as
the basis
e.g. ([netcfg] or [devtools]). Otherwiese there is quite a chance
that mails will get lost; especially if the traffic on that list
increases.
Greetings,
Pierre
--
Pierre Schmitz, https://users.archlinux.de/~pierre
users. Archbuild has now
to be run directly via sudo. See
http://projects.archlinux.org/devtools.git/log/ for more details. And
thanks to everybody envolved.
Let me know if anything does no longer work as expected.
Greetings,
Pierre
--
Pierre Schmitz, https://users.archlinux.de/~pierre
increment epoch, it will completely and utterly
outrank any previous version of the package. Make sure this is what
you want.
* epoch should be seen as a last resort.
--
Pierre Schmitz, https://users.archlinux.de/~pierre
faster. Using menu based completion with
zsh and grml-zsh-config is now a lot more fun as there is no noticeable
delay anymore.
Greetings,
Pierre
--
Pierre Schmitz, https://users.archlinux.de/~pierre
On Thu, 17 Mar 2011 06:50:30 +1000, Allan McRae wrote:
On 17/03/11 06:39, Pierre Schmitz wrote:
You are right, I missed that. I have no idea how to fix the testing
host with extra chroot problem. Is there a way to detect when running
pacman-db-upgrade is needed?
find /var/lib/pacman/local
On Wed, 16 Mar 2011 16:24:42 -0500, Dan McGee wrote:
On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 4:21 PM, Pierre Schmitz pie...@archlinux.de wrote:
I guess to solve the first problem we would
also need a pacman-db-downgrade script.
pacman-db-downgrade would be basically impossible... you could
symlink the desc
://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27572
I can confirm this issue on my intel netbook, too. But it does not look
like as if this will be fixed very soon.
--
Pierre Schmitz, https://users.archlinux.de/~pierre
, in filllibcache
for j in var[0].decode('ascii').splitlines():
UnicodeDecodeError: 'ascii' codec can't decode byte 0xc2 in position
27: ordinal not in range(128)
--
Pierre Schmitz, https://users.archlinux.de/~pierre
wonder if we
really should add such helper scripts at all. No offense though, you
probably have some good reasons to do so which I don't see atm.
Greetings,
Pierre
--
Pierre Schmitz, https://users.archlinux.de/~pierre
not mind if nano was the only interactive editor in
[core]. But keeping the current busybox vi is also fine.
--
Pierre Schmitz, https://users.archlinux.de/~pierre
is enabled we
must
escape the escape character (backslash) or the resulting string is
ambiguous.
[Steve Henson]
Greetings,
Pierre
--
Pierre Schmitz, https://users.archlinux.de/~pierre
need to adjust the my.cnf. I had some options in there that are no
longer valid.
--
Pierre Schmitz, https://users.archlinux.de/~pierre
?
There are still some problems with split packages in dbscripts and
those are complex enough; so we should be really careful and not make
things even worse.
Greetings,
Pierre
--
Pierre Schmitz, https://users.archlinux.de/~pierre
On Thu, 3 Feb 2011 17:33:10 -0500, Eric Bélanger wrote:
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 6:23 AM, Pierre Schmitz pie...@archlinux.de wrote:
2) check_splitpkgs: get correct arch for svnnames
Feel free to send me you ideas or some rough patches for a review.
I got rid of that function. It seemed
and bzip2 support in xzdiff was fixed.
* Portability fixes
* Minor fix to Czech translation
--
Pierre Schmitz, https://users.archlinux.de/~pierre
to the repos. ;-)
--
Pierre Schmitz, https://users.archlinux.de/~pierre
and being able to check against all installed
deps.
--
Pierre Schmitz, https://users.archlinux.de/~pierre
random reboots.
Greetings,
Pierre
--
Pierre Schmitz, https://users.archlinux.de/~pierre
in the first place. The package itself will be
larger but the size of the installed kernel modules combined will be
smaller.
--
Pierre Schmitz, https://users.archlinux.de/~pierre
for a
lock being released by root (which is still fine) but at the end it
looks like someone else unlocked all repos during that time which is
definitely not fine.
Greetings,
Pierre
--
Pierre Schmitz, https://users.archlinux.de/~pierre
201 - 300 of 1279 matches
Mail list logo
