Here are the current build failures in [core] when using the gcc-4.8
toolchain
Old:
FAIL: curl
FAIL: isdn4k-utils
FAIL: libtirpc
FAIL: net-tools
FAIL: ppl
New:
FAIL: iproute2
lnstat.c: In function 'build_hdr_string':
lnstat.c:169:30: error: argument to 'sizeof' in 'memset' call is the
On 31/03/13 13:08, Allan McRae wrote:
FAIL: libcap
library gets installed to /usr/lib64 - ???
Nothing to to with the toolchain - it uses:
lib=$(shell ldd /usr/bin/ld|fgrep ld-linux|cut -d/ -f2)
to find the lib directory. Now the linkers shows as /lib64/ld-linux...
Am 17.03.2013 11:32, schrieb Pierre Schmitz:
Would it be reasonable to add systemd to base-devel
I don't see how systemd is required for building packages, unless you
link to libsystemd-*.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Am 13.03.2013 13:22, schrieb Allan McRae:
Hi,
This build was done with a chroot containing only base-devel and sudo.
Not many packages failed due to this, and can readily be fixed by adding
makedepends. So it seems the idea of reducing our build chroots down is
good to go!
Would it be
Am 17.03.2013 11:32, schrieb Pierre Schmitz:
Am 13.03.2013 13:22, schrieb Allan McRae:
Hi,
This build was done with a chroot containing only base-devel and sudo.
Not many packages failed due to this, and can readily be fixed by adding
makedepends. So it seems the idea of reducing our build
On 14 March 2013 03:35, Sébastien Luttringer se...@seblu.net wrote:
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 1:22 PM, Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org wrote:
Hi,
This build was done with a chroot containing only base-devel and sudo.
Not many packages failed due to this, and can readily be fixed by adding
Hi,
This build was done with a chroot containing only base-devel and sudo.
Not many packages failed due to this, and can readily be fixed by adding
makedepends. So it seems the idea of reducing our build chroots down is
good to go!
Missing makedepends:
FAIL: dbus
- configure: error:
On 13/03/13 14:22, Allan McRae wrote:
Hi,
This build was done with a chroot containing only base-devel and sudo.
Not many packages failed due to this, and can readily be fixed by adding
makedepends. So it seems the idea of reducing our build chroots down is
good to go!
Not bad! A new
On 14/03/13 00:27, Evangelos Foutras wrote:
On 13/03/13 14:22, Allan McRae wrote:
Hi,
This build was done with a chroot containing only base-devel and sudo.
Not many packages failed due to this, and can readily be fixed by adding
makedepends. So it seems the idea of reducing our build
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 8:22 AM, Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org wrote:
Hi,
This build was done with a chroot containing only base-devel and sudo.
Not many packages failed due to this, and can readily be fixed by adding
makedepends. So it seems the idea of reducing our build chroots down is
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 1:22 PM, Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org wrote:
Hi,
This build was done with a chroot containing only base-devel and sudo.
Not many packages failed due to this, and can readily be fixed by adding
makedepends. So it seems the idea of reducing our build chroots down is
Le 2012-03-10 19:10, Allan McRae a écrit :
Checksum Mismatches:
FAIL: keyutils
keyutils-1.5.5.tar.bz2 ... FAILED
I will take care of this.
Stéphane
On 03/11/2012 02:10 AM, Allan McRae wrote:
FAIL: iproute2
ipl2tp.c:26:29: fatal error: netlink/netlink.h: No such file or
directory
fixed
--
Ionuț
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 1:10 AM, Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org wrote:
FAIL: pcmciautils
curl: (22) The requested URL returned error: 404
Official upstream repo has not been restored after the kernel.org
breakin. I'm looking into it.
FAIL: usbutils
curl: (22) The requested URL
Am 12.03.2012 16:00, schrieb Tom Gundersen:
On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 1:10 AM, Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org wrote
Similarly, has not been reuploaded to k.o, but this one has a github
repo: https://lwn.net/Articles/464178/.
Cheers,
Tom
Tom,
go ahead with usbutils i don't have the time for
On Mar 12, 2012 5:44 PM, Tobias Powalowski
tobias.powalow...@googlemail.com wrote:
Am 12.03.2012 16:00, schrieb Tom Gundersen:
On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 1:10 AM, Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org wrote
Similarly, has not been reuploaded to k.o, but this one has a github
repo:
The following packages in the [core] repo fail to build:
Missing Sources:
FAIL: gcc
curl: (78) RETR response: 550
FAIL: pcmciautils
curl: (22) The requested URL returned error: 404
FAIL: usbutils
curl: (22) The requested URL returned error: 404
Build Failures:
17 matches
Mail list logo