[arch-dev-public] core build report - gcc-4.8 toolchain

2013-03-30 Thread Allan McRae
Here are the current build failures in [core] when using the gcc-4.8 toolchain Old: FAIL: curl FAIL: isdn4k-utils FAIL: libtirpc FAIL: net-tools FAIL: ppl New: FAIL: iproute2 lnstat.c: In function 'build_hdr_string': lnstat.c:169:30: error: argument to 'sizeof' in 'memset' call is the

Re: [arch-dev-public] core build report - gcc-4.8 toolchain

2013-03-30 Thread Allan McRae
On 31/03/13 13:08, Allan McRae wrote: FAIL: libcap library gets installed to /usr/lib64 - ??? Nothing to to with the toolchain - it uses: lib=$(shell ldd /usr/bin/ld|fgrep ld-linux|cut -d/ -f2) to find the lib directory. Now the linkers shows as /lib64/ld-linux...

Re: [arch-dev-public] [core] build report

2013-03-18 Thread Thomas Bächler
Am 17.03.2013 11:32, schrieb Pierre Schmitz: Would it be reasonable to add systemd to base-devel I don't see how systemd is required for building packages, unless you link to libsystemd-*. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [arch-dev-public] [core] build report

2013-03-17 Thread Pierre Schmitz
Am 13.03.2013 13:22, schrieb Allan McRae: Hi, This build was done with a chroot containing only base-devel and sudo. Not many packages failed due to this, and can readily be fixed by adding makedepends. So it seems the idea of reducing our build chroots down is good to go! Would it be

Re: [arch-dev-public] [core] build report

2013-03-17 Thread Pierre Schmitz
Am 17.03.2013 11:32, schrieb Pierre Schmitz: Am 13.03.2013 13:22, schrieb Allan McRae: Hi, This build was done with a chroot containing only base-devel and sudo. Not many packages failed due to this, and can readily be fixed by adding makedepends. So it seems the idea of reducing our build

Re: [arch-dev-public] [core] build report

2013-03-16 Thread Evangelos Foutras
On 14 March 2013 03:35, Sébastien Luttringer se...@seblu.net wrote: On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 1:22 PM, Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org wrote: Hi, This build was done with a chroot containing only base-devel and sudo. Not many packages failed due to this, and can readily be fixed by adding

[arch-dev-public] [core] build report

2013-03-13 Thread Allan McRae
Hi, This build was done with a chroot containing only base-devel and sudo. Not many packages failed due to this, and can readily be fixed by adding makedepends. So it seems the idea of reducing our build chroots down is good to go! Missing makedepends: FAIL: dbus - configure: error:

Re: [arch-dev-public] [core] build report

2013-03-13 Thread Evangelos Foutras
On 13/03/13 14:22, Allan McRae wrote: Hi, This build was done with a chroot containing only base-devel and sudo. Not many packages failed due to this, and can readily be fixed by adding makedepends. So it seems the idea of reducing our build chroots down is good to go! Not bad! A new

Re: [arch-dev-public] [core] build report

2013-03-13 Thread Allan McRae
On 14/03/13 00:27, Evangelos Foutras wrote: On 13/03/13 14:22, Allan McRae wrote: Hi, This build was done with a chroot containing only base-devel and sudo. Not many packages failed due to this, and can readily be fixed by adding makedepends. So it seems the idea of reducing our build

Re: [arch-dev-public] [core] build report

2013-03-13 Thread Eric Bélanger
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 8:22 AM, Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org wrote: Hi, This build was done with a chroot containing only base-devel and sudo. Not many packages failed due to this, and can readily be fixed by adding makedepends. So it seems the idea of reducing our build chroots down is

Re: [arch-dev-public] [core] build report

2013-03-13 Thread Sébastien Luttringer
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 1:22 PM, Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org wrote: Hi, This build was done with a chroot containing only base-devel and sudo. Not many packages failed due to this, and can readily be fixed by adding makedepends. So it seems the idea of reducing our build chroots down is

Re: [arch-dev-public] [core] build report - 2012-03-10

2012-03-12 Thread Stéphane Gaudreault
Le 2012-03-10 19:10, Allan McRae a écrit : Checksum Mismatches: FAIL: keyutils keyutils-1.5.5.tar.bz2 ... FAILED I will take care of this. Stéphane

Re: [arch-dev-public] [core] build report - 2012-03-10

2012-03-12 Thread Ionut Biru
On 03/11/2012 02:10 AM, Allan McRae wrote: FAIL: iproute2 ipl2tp.c:26:29: fatal error: netlink/netlink.h: No such file or directory fixed -- Ionuț signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [arch-dev-public] [core] build report - 2012-03-10

2012-03-12 Thread Tom Gundersen
On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 1:10 AM, Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org wrote:    FAIL: pcmciautils    curl: (22) The requested URL returned error: 404 Official upstream repo has not been restored after the kernel.org breakin. I'm looking into it.    FAIL: usbutils    curl: (22) The requested URL

Re: [arch-dev-public] [core] build report - 2012-03-10

2012-03-12 Thread Tobias Powalowski
Am 12.03.2012 16:00, schrieb Tom Gundersen: On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 1:10 AM, Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org wrote Similarly, has not been reuploaded to k.o, but this one has a github repo: https://lwn.net/Articles/464178/. Cheers, Tom Tom, go ahead with usbutils i don't have the time for

Re: [arch-dev-public] [core] build report - 2012-03-10

2012-03-12 Thread Tom Gundersen
On Mar 12, 2012 5:44 PM, Tobias Powalowski tobias.powalow...@googlemail.com wrote: Am 12.03.2012 16:00, schrieb Tom Gundersen: On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 1:10 AM, Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org wrote Similarly, has not been reuploaded to k.o, but this one has a github repo:

[arch-dev-public] [core] build report - 2012-03-10

2012-03-10 Thread Allan McRae
The following packages in the [core] repo fail to build: Missing Sources: FAIL: gcc curl: (78) RETR response: 550 FAIL: pcmciautils curl: (22) The requested URL returned error: 404 FAIL: usbutils curl: (22) The requested URL returned error: 404 Build Failures: