On Mon, 15 Dec 2008, Aaron Griffin wrote:
On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 4:40 PM, Dan McGee dpmc...@gmail.com wrote:
This is a dual signoff. I have split the pacman mirrorlist into its
own package because
1) Pacman releases are not all that common (because its perfect
software, of course!)
2) Our
On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 4:40 PM, Dan McGee dpmc...@gmail.com wrote:
This is a dual signoff. I have split the pacman mirrorlist into its
own package because
1) Pacman releases are not all that common (because its perfect
software, of course!)
2) Our packaged mirrorlist often lags waaay behind
This is a dual signoff. I have split the pacman mirrorlist into its
own package because
1) Pacman releases are not all that common (because its perfect
software, of course!)
2) Our packaged mirrorlist often lags waaay behind the actual one in
SVN, because I find it a waste to rebuild pacman just
Dan McGee wrote:
This is a dual signoff. I have split the pacman mirrorlist into its
own package because
1) Pacman releases are not all that common (because its perfect
software, of course!)
2) Our packaged mirrorlist often lags waaay behind the actual one in
SVN, because I find it a waste to
Dan McGee wrote:
This is a dual signoff. I have split the pacman mirrorlist into its
own package because
1) Pacman releases are not all that common (because its perfect
software, of course!)
2) Our packaged mirrorlist often lags waaay behind the actual one in
SVN, because I find it a waste to
5 matches
Mail list logo
