On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 5:50 AM, Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org wrote:
Doing a pacman -Syu gave a conflict as expected. Did not test that
pacman -Syu --force failed, because it was on my only working system
at the moment.
The followed the instructions above. Rebooted at the end for good
And it is now in the [testing] repository.
A reminder of the upgrade instructions:
1) Fix any non-official packages with files in /bin, /sbin or /usr/sbin
to put those files in /usr/bin. The list of packages to be fixed can be
generated using:
$ comm -12 (pacman -Qqm) (pacman -Qqo /bin /sbin
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 12:02 PM, Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org wrote:
And it is now in the [testing] repository.
A reminder of the upgrade instructions:
1) Fix any non-official packages with files in /bin, /sbin or /usr/sbin
to put those files in /usr/bin. The list of packages to be
On 31/05/13 21:03, Sébastien Luttringer wrote:
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 12:02 PM, Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org wrote:
And it is now in the [testing] repository.
A reminder of the upgrade instructions:
1) Fix any non-official packages with files in /bin, /sbin or /usr/sbin
to put those
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 1:27 PM, Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org wrote:
On 31/05/13 21:03, Sébastien Luttringer wrote:
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 12:02 PM, Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org wrote:
And it is now in the [testing] repository.
A reminder of the upgrade instructions:
1) Fix any
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 1:35 PM, Sébastien Luttringer se...@seblu.net wrote:
Why not symlink /usr/local/sbin to /usr/local/bin in filesystems?
I think we should do this, but not everyone agrees. As it is
independent of the current move, let's discuss it once that has
finished.
-t
On 31/05/13 21:35, Sébastien Luttringer wrote:
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 1:27 PM, Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org wrote:
On 31/05/13 21:03, Sébastien Luttringer wrote:
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 12:02 PM, Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org wrote:
And it is now in the [testing] repository.
A reminder
Am 31.05.2013 13:40, schrieb Allan McRae:
Why not symlink /usr/local/sbin to /usr/local/bin in filesystems?
Because there is absolutely no upgrade path for that.
Wouldn't this work?
$ pacman -Syu --ignore filesystem
$ mv -i /usr/local/sbin/* /usr/local/bin
$ pacman -Syu
--
Pierre Schmitz,
On 31/05/13 21:44, Pierre Schmitz wrote:
Am 31.05.2013 13:40, schrieb Allan McRae:
Why not symlink /usr/local/sbin to /usr/local/bin in filesystems?
Because there is absolutely no upgrade path for that.
Wouldn't this work?
$ pacman -Syu --ignore filesystem
$ mv -i /usr/local/sbin/*
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 5:35 AM, Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org wrote:
On 30/05/13 06:23, Eric Bélanger wrote:
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 9:56 PM, Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org wrote:
I'm bored of waiting... so lets do this! What a plans with regard to
[staging] in the near future? When
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 4:31 PM, Tom Gundersen t...@jklm.no wrote:
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 5:35 AM, Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org wrote:
On 30/05/13 06:23, Eric Bélanger wrote:
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 9:56 PM, Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org wrote:
I'm bored of waiting... so lets do this!
On 29/05/13 11:56, Allan McRae wrote:
Draft upgrade instructions:
1) Fix any non-official packages with files in /bin, /sbin or /usr/sbin
to put those files in /usr/bin. The list of packages to be fixed can be
generated using:
$ comm -12 (pacman -Qqm) (pacman -Qqo /bin /sbin /usr/sbin |
[2013-05-29 11:56:57 +1000] Allan McRae:
1) Fix any non-official packages with files in /bin, /sbin or /usr/sbin
to put those files in /usr/bin.
How should we handle paths that are hardcoded everywhere, such as
/usr/sbin/sendmail? Will the filesystem package ship a global symlink
from /usr/sbin
On 29/05/13 17:57, Gaetan Bisson wrote:
[2013-05-29 11:56:57 +1000] Allan McRae:
1) Fix any non-official packages with files in /bin, /sbin or /usr/sbin
to put those files in /usr/bin.
How should we handle paths that are hardcoded everywhere, such as
/usr/sbin/sendmail? Will the filesystem
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 3:56 AM, Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org wrote:
I'm bored of waiting... so lets do this!
Please do. I suppose people can still skip staging for packages where
that makes sense to minimize the congestion?
What a plans with regard to
[staging] in the near future?
If
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 9:56 PM, Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org wrote:
I'm bored of waiting... so lets do this! What a plans with regard to
[staging] in the near future? When it is free, I will kill the current
TODO list and create a new one.
I just moved the openobex rebuild to the
On 30/05/13 06:23, Eric Bélanger wrote:
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 9:56 PM, Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org wrote:
I'm bored of waiting... so lets do this! What a plans with regard to
[staging] in the near future? When it is free, I will kill the current
TODO list and create a new one.
I'm bored of waiting... so lets do this! What a plans with regard to
[staging] in the near future? When it is free, I will kill the current
TODO list and create a new one.
As far as building goes, I'd suggest building in a [testing] chroot and
then uploading to [staging]. Building from
18 matches
Mail list logo
