Re: [arch-dev-public] Heimdal changes - moving sqlite to core?

2009-01-12 Thread Andreas Radke
Am Sun, 11 Jan 2009 13:42:24 -0500 schrieb Eric Bélanger snowmanisc...@gmail.com: And the extra - community makedependencies appear as missing since community was not considered : xosd -- 'xmms' flac -- 'xmms' The makedepends is to build plugins. It was brought up on the ML before

Re: [arch-dev-public] Heimdal changes - moving sqlite to core?

2009-01-12 Thread Eric Bélanger
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 1:01 PM, Andreas Radke a.ra...@arcor.de wrote: Am Sun, 11 Jan 2009 13:42:24 -0500 schrieb Eric Bélanger snowmanisc...@gmail.com: And the extra - community makedependencies appear as missing since community was not considered : xosd -- 'xmms' flac -- 'xmms'

Re: [arch-dev-public] Heimdal changes - moving sqlite to core?

2009-01-11 Thread Eric Bélanger
On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 11:54 AM, Xavier shinin...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 10:54 PM, Andreas Radke a.ra...@arcor.de wrote: Am Fri, 9 Jan 2009 16:33:56 -0500 schrieb Eric Bélanger snowmanisc...@gmail.com: BTW, it has a makedepends on tcl. We should keep tcl in extra as several

Re: [arch-dev-public] Heimdal changes - moving sqlite to core?

2009-01-10 Thread Andreas Radke
Am Sat, 10 Jan 2009 12:47:31 +1000 schrieb Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org: Andreas Radke wrote: Am Fri, 9 Jan 2009 16:33:56 -0500 schrieb Eric Bélanger snowmanisc...@gmail.com: BTW, it has a makedepends on tcl. We should keep tcl in extra as several other package in core have

Re: [arch-dev-public] Heimdal changes - moving sqlite to core?

2009-01-09 Thread Allan McRae
Jan de Groot wrote: The new heimdal package I created depends on sqlite3 now because I replaced the included static copy of sqlite inside heimdal with the dynamic linked system installed version. Sqlite3 is in extra, while heimdal is in core. At this moment only ssh in core depends on heimdal.

Re: [arch-dev-public] Heimdal changes - moving sqlite to core?

2009-01-09 Thread Thomas Bächler
Allan McRae schrieb: Is ssh really needed for getting a system running and ready to install further packages (my definition of what should be in [core])? I really do not think it is needed so I am happy with this moving to [extra]. Allan IMO, ssh should really be in core! Why does it have

Re: [arch-dev-public] Heimdal changes - moving sqlite to core?

2009-01-09 Thread Dan McGee
On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 5:15 AM, Thomas Bächler tho...@archlinux.org wrote: Allan McRae schrieb: Is ssh really needed for getting a system running and ready to install further packages (my definition of what should be in [core])? I really do not think it is needed so I am happy with this

Re: [arch-dev-public] Heimdal changes - moving sqlite to core?

2009-01-09 Thread Dusty Phillips
2009/1/9 Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org: Is ssh really needed for getting a system running and ready to install further packages (my definition of what should be in [core])? I really do not think it is needed so I am happy with this moving to [extra]. sshd is if you're doing a remote

Re: [arch-dev-public] Heimdal changes - moving sqlite to core?

2009-01-09 Thread Eduardo Romero
On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 7:03 AM, Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org wrote: Is ssh really needed for getting a system running and ready to install further packages (my definition of what should be in [core])? I really do not think it is needed so I am happy with this moving to [extra]. Allan

Re: [arch-dev-public] Heimdal changes - moving sqlite to core?

2009-01-09 Thread Thomas Bächler
Eduardo Romero schrieb: There was one time that a moron of a reviewer said Arch Linux sucks, because ssh was not enabled by default, so go figure out. That guy probably didn't even try to understand the concept of Arch or otherwise he would have realized that virtually nothing is enabled by

Re: [arch-dev-public] Heimdal changes - moving sqlite to core?

2009-01-09 Thread Aaron Griffin
On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 3:28 AM, Jan de Groot j...@jgc.homeip.net wrote: The new heimdal package I created depends on sqlite3 now because I replaced the included static copy of sqlite inside heimdal with the dynamic linked system installed version. Sqlite3 is in extra, while heimdal is in core.

Re: [arch-dev-public] Heimdal changes - moving sqlite to core?

2009-01-09 Thread Andreas Radke
Am Fri, 9 Jan 2009 13:08:03 -0600 schrieb Aaron Griffin aaronmgrif...@gmail.com: What are the cons for moving sqlite to core? Does it pull in any other deps? I'm fine with moving sqlite3 into core. It doesn't pull additional deps. -Andy

Re: [arch-dev-public] Heimdal changes - moving sqlite to core?

2009-01-09 Thread Aaron Griffin
On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 2:03 PM, Andreas Radke a.ra...@arcor.de wrote: Am Fri, 9 Jan 2009 13:08:03 -0600 schrieb Aaron Griffin aaronmgrif...@gmail.com: What are the cons for moving sqlite to core? Does it pull in any other deps? I'm fine with moving sqlite3 into core. It doesn't pull

Re: [arch-dev-public] Heimdal changes - moving sqlite to core?

2009-01-09 Thread Eric Bélanger
On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 3:05 PM, Aaron Griffin aaronmgrif...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 2:03 PM, Andreas Radke a.ra...@arcor.de wrote: Am Fri, 9 Jan 2009 13:08:03 -0600 schrieb Aaron Griffin aaronmgrif...@gmail.com: What are the cons for moving sqlite to core? Does it pull in any

Re: [arch-dev-public] Heimdal changes - moving sqlite to core?

2009-01-09 Thread Andreas Radke
Am Fri, 9 Jan 2009 16:33:56 -0500 schrieb Eric Bélanger snowmanisc...@gmail.com: BTW, it has a makedepends on tcl. We should keep tcl in extra as several other package in core have makedepends on packages from extra. That's something I really dislike. I try to keep my chroots clean wherever

Re: [arch-dev-public] Heimdal changes - moving sqlite to core?

2009-01-09 Thread Allan McRae
Andreas Radke wrote: Am Fri, 9 Jan 2009 16:33:56 -0500 schrieb Eric Bélanger snowmanisc...@gmail.com: BTW, it has a makedepends on tcl. We should keep tcl in extra as several other package in core have makedepends on packages from extra. That's something I really dislike. I try to