Re: [arch-dev-public] replace gqview and gqview-devel with geeqie

2008-11-14 Thread Eric BĂ©langer
On Fri, 24 Oct 2008, Eric Belanger wrote: On Thu, 9 Oct 2008, Tobias Kieslich wrote: On Thu, 09 Oct 2008, Eric Belanger wrote: I've been using geeqie for the last few months and haven't noticed any problems. I could add it to the repo unless you (Tobias) want to do so. The question is:

Re: [arch-dev-public] replace gqview and gqview-devel with geeqie

2008-10-23 Thread Eric Belanger
On Thu, 9 Oct 2008, Tobias Kieslich wrote: On Thu, 09 Oct 2008, Eric Belanger wrote: I've been using geeqie for the last few months and haven't noticed any problems. I could add it to the repo unless you (Tobias) want to do so. The question is: Should it replace both gqview and gqview-devel

Re: [arch-dev-public] replace gqview and gqview-devel with geeqie

2008-10-10 Thread Dusty Phillips
2008/10/10 Tobias Kieslich [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Thu, 09 Oct 2008, Eric Belanger wrote: I've been using geeqie for the last few months and haven't noticed any problems. I could add it to the repo unless you (Tobias) want to do so. The question is: Should it replace both gqview and

Re: [arch-dev-public] replace gqview and gqview-devel with geeqie

2008-10-09 Thread Eric Belanger
On Thu, 14 Aug 2008, Eric Belanger wrote: On Sat, 19 Jul 2008, Firmicus wrote: Tobias Kieslich wrote: Hi guys just to make that clear, I'm planning on bringing in the alpha version from april, which basically is gqview-devel with a view patches that people contributed and were both

Re: [arch-dev-public] replace gqview and gqview-devel with geeqie

2008-07-19 Thread Firmicus
Tobias Kieslich wrote: Hi guys just to make that clear, I'm planning on bringing in the alpha version from april, which basically is gqview-devel with a view patches that people contributed and were both tested for a long time and reviewed. Actual geegie development stred from there

Re: [arch-dev-public] replace gqview and gqview-devel with geeqie

2008-07-18 Thread Eric Belanger
On Fri, 18 Jul 2008, Tobias Kieslich wrote: On Fri, 18 Jul 2008, Firmicus wrote: I use gqview intensively, and never experienced any problem. I have compiled and installed geeqie-svn a few days ago (after reading this thread) and used it everyday since then. I experienced many crashes! May I

Re: [arch-dev-public] replace gqview and gqview-devel with geeqie

2008-07-18 Thread Firmicus
Eric Belanger wrote: On Fri, 18 Jul 2008, Tobias Kieslich wrote: Another plan would be to add geeqie and to update gqview to its devel version. The devel version of gqview is very stable. I never tried gqview-devel because gqview just worked for me. But I trust you on that. Just out of

[arch-dev-public] replace gqview and gqview-devel with geeqie

2008-07-10 Thread Tobias Kieslich
Hi, I just noticed that both gqview and gqview-devel got updated and that reminded me that the gqview project is essentially defunct. Saying that, there is a fork called geeqie and we do have a package for the alpha version in the aur. This version is basically a gqview-devel with some

Re: [arch-dev-public] replace gqview and gqview-devel with geeqie

2008-07-10 Thread Aaron Griffin
On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 3:16 PM, Tobias Kieslich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I just noticed that both gqview and gqview-devel got updated and that reminded me that the gqview project is essentially defunct. Saying that, there is a fork called geeqie and we do have a package for the

Re: [arch-dev-public] replace gqview and gqview-devel with geeqie

2008-07-10 Thread Eric Belanger
On Thu, 10 Jul 2008, Tobias Kieslich wrote: Hi, I just noticed that both gqview and gqview-devel got updated and that reminded me that the gqview project is essentially defunct. Saying that, there is a fork called geeqie and we do have a package for the alpha version in the aur. This