On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 10:05 PM, Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org wrote:
Eric Bélanger wrote:
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 3:52 PM, Dusty Phillips buch...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/1/12 Dale Blount d...@archlinux.org:
I think we have two options here:
* We completely get rid of gtk and all
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 04:05, Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org wrote:
I think that is a bug: http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/12723
That is.
--
Geoffroy Carrier
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 1:50 PM, Eric Bélanger snowmanisc...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 1:01 PM, Andreas Radke a.ra...@arcor.de wrote:
Am Sun, 11 Jan 2009 13:42:24 -0500
schrieb Eric Bélanger snowmanisc...@gmail.com:
And the extra - community makedependencies appear as missing
I think we have two options here:
* We completely get rid of gtk and all packages which depend on it.
* We allow xmms back into extra
I'm fine with either one, but I do think it'd be silly not to move
xmms to extra based on the usage stats
I'm also fine either way, but remember, installed
2009/1/12 Dale Blount d...@archlinux.org:
I think we have two options here:
* We completely get rid of gtk and all packages which depend on it.
* We allow xmms back into extra
I'm fine with either one, but I do think it'd be silly not to move
xmms to extra based on the usage stats
I'm
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 3:52 PM, Dusty Phillips buch...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/1/12 Dale Blount d...@archlinux.org:
I think we have two options here:
* We completely get rid of gtk and all packages which depend on it.
* We allow xmms back into extra
I'm fine with either one, but I do think
Eric Bélanger wrote:
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 3:52 PM, Dusty Phillips buch...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/1/12 Dale Blount d...@archlinux.org:
I think we have two options here:
* We completely get rid of gtk and all packages which depend on it.
* We allow xmms back into extra
I'm fine with
7 matches
Mail list logo