[arch-dev-public] AUR ToS (aka making AUR user names public)

2017-03-05 Thread Lukas Fleischer
Hi, I was recently contacted by a Polish researcher asking for a list of AUR account names. I did not expect this to be controversial but a couple of Trusted Users raised concerns on IRC, so I decided to move this to the public mailing list and discuss the whole topic in generality. I would like

Re: [arch-dev-public] AUR ToS (aka making AUR user names public)

2017-03-05 Thread Gaetan Bisson
[2017-03-05 14:35:05 +0100] Lukas Fleischer: > My original questions was: Are we fine with sharing the list of AUR > accounts names (only user names, no real names or email addresses) with > a researcher that seems trustworthy and agrees to not share the data in > any form other than the resulting

Re: [arch-dev-public] AUR ToS (aka making AUR user names public)

2017-03-05 Thread Dave Reisner
On Sun, Mar 5, 2017 at 10:34 AM, Lukas Fleischer wrote: > On Sun, 05 Mar 2017 at 19:11:33, Dave Reisner wrote: > > As long as we publish a list of all available packages, it doesn't matter > > if we comply with this request -- the information is already obtainable > >

Re: [arch-dev-public] AUR ToS (aka making AUR user names public)

2017-03-05 Thread Lukas Fleischer
On Sun, 05 Mar 2017 at 18:40:36, Thorsten Töpper wrote: > As stated in IRC I'm against handing out user data (including nick > names) to a 3rd party. Personally due to mentioned privacy stuff, but > also the legal problems we may run into as we don't have a ToS. So > under these circumstances I

Re: [arch-dev-public] AUR ToS (aka making AUR user names public)

2017-03-05 Thread Thorsten Töpper
On Sun, 05 Mar 2017 14:35:05 +0100 Lukas Fleischer wrote: > Hi, > > I was recently contacted by a Polish researcher asking for a list of > AUR account names. I did not expect this to be controversial but a > couple of Trusted Users raised concerns on IRC, so I decided

Re: [arch-dev-public] AUR ToS (aka making AUR user names public)

2017-03-05 Thread Dave Reisner
On Mar 5, 2017 8:35 AM, "Lukas Fleischer" wrote: Hi, I was recently contacted by a Polish researcher asking for a list of AUR account names. I did not expect this to be controversial but a couple of Trusted Users raised concerns on IRC, so I decided to move this to the

Re: [arch-dev-public] AUR ToS (aka making AUR user names public)

2017-03-05 Thread Lukas Fleischer
On Sun, 05 Mar 2017 at 19:11:33, Dave Reisner wrote: > As long as we publish a list of all available packages, it doesn't matter > if we comply with this request -- the information is already obtainable > through RPC requests. Could you elaborate, please? I do not see how this information is

[arch-dev-public] Integrity Check i686: core, extra, community 06-03-2017

2017-03-05 Thread repomaint
= Integrity Check i686 of core,extra,community = Performing integrity checks... ==> parsing pkgbuilds ==> parsing db files ==> checking mismatches ==> checking archs ==> checking dependencies ==>

Re: [arch-dev-public] AUR ToS (aka making AUR user names public)

2017-03-05 Thread Gaetan Bisson
Dave, You appeared to have inserted some text in the middle of Lukas' message with no indication whatsoever which paragraphs are yours and which are his. I'm sure GMail can tell them apart but for those of us who use run-of-the-mill emails could you find a way to fix this behavior? I'm attaching