On 20 July 2012 22:34, David C. Rankin drankina...@suddenlinkmail.com wrote:
Guys,
After going though the usrlib/glibc update and creating a new archroot for
building, I am getting build failures in trinity k3b and k9copy. Both packages
built without error on 7/14 prior to my update.
On 2012/6/26 Rémy Oudompheng remyoudomph...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I am going to put Texlive 2012 packages in [testing]. Texlive 2012 is
not yet released, but it is frozen, so I do not expect changes to
these packages except to fix packaging errors.
Please try them and complain on mailing
Rodrigo Rivas rodrigorivasco...@gmail.com on Sat, 2012/07/21 00:36:
On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 12:25 AM, Rodrigo Rivas rodrigorivasco...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 8:32 PM, Christian Hesse l...@eworm.de wrote:
Hello everybody,
I am creating live media and want to reduce
Hello Ike,
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 10:15:48PM +0200, Ike Devolder wrote:
Op vrijdag 20 juli 2012 22:06:31 schreef Arvid Warnecke:
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 03:52:34PM -0400, Daniel Wallace wrote:
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 09:53:01PM +0200, Arvid Warnecke wrote:
Is there an ideal way of
General Discussion about Arch Linux arch-general@archlinux.org
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 03:41:08PM -0600, D. R. Evans wrote:
pacman -Su
Not OK:
[root@shack n7dr]# pacman -Su
:: Starting full system upgrade...
resolving dependencies...
looking for inter-conflicts...
Targets
Op zaterdag 21 juli 2012 13:30:24 schreef Arvid Warnecke:
Hello Ike,
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 10:15:48PM +0200, Ike Devolder wrote:
Op vrijdag 20 juli 2012 22:06:31 schreef Arvid Warnecke:
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 03:52:34PM -0400, Daniel Wallace wrote:
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at
Norbert Zeh said the following at 07/20/2012 05:34 PM :
pacman -Su
Not OK:
[root@shack n7dr]# pacman -Su
:: Starting full system upgrade...
resolving dependencies...
looking for inter-conflicts...
Targets (1): glibc-2.16.0-2
Total Installed Size: 33.94 MiB
Net Upgrade Size:
Maybe I'm missing an instruction somewhere, but I don't see it.
Doc
My reading comprehension may be lacking, but did you check to see if
there are any files in /lib that are *not* owned by any package?
find /lib -exec pacman -Qo -- {} +
Commonly there are some directories like
On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 4:57 PM, D. R. Evans doc.ev...@gmail.com wrote:
I *think* that this means that in fact glibc owns all the files.
It means that no other package owns any files. It might still be that
there are files in /lib that are not owned by any package. pacman -Qo
/lib/* should tell
Ariel Popper said the following at 07/21/2012 09:24 AM :
My reading comprehension may be lacking, but did you check to see if
there are any files in /lib that are *not* owned by any package?
find /lib -exec pacman -Qo -- {} +
Commonly there are some directories like /lib/modules or in my
On 07/21/2012 11:24 AM, Tom Gundersen wrote:
On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 4:57 PM, D. R. Evans doc.ev...@gmail.com wrote:
I *think* that this means that in fact glibc owns all the files.
It means that no other package owns any files. It might still be that
there are files in /lib that are not owned
On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 04:27:41PM +0200, Ike Devolder wrote:
Op zaterdag 21 juli 2012 13:30:24 schreef Arvid Warnecke:
Worked well.
But did not solve the problem. Hibernation still seems to work at first,
but when I start the laptop it boots normally, fscks disks because of
unclean
On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 4:51 AM, Tom Gundersen t...@jklm.no wrote:
On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 8:48 AM, Evangelos Foutras
evange...@foutrelis.com wrote:
I find removing most of the variables to be confusing and would
suggest that [1] and [2] get reverted.
I'm not going to revert them
On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 3:02 PM, Myra Nelson myra.nel...@hughes.net wrote:
Tom:
The concerns expressed by Evangelos and Tobias were some of the concerns I
had when the push towards systemd started. Systemd is great if you are
managing a large number of computers, but excessive overkill for
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/20/12 15:34, John Briggs wrote:
General Discussion about Arch Linux arch-general@archlinux.org
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 03:41:08PM -0600, D. R. Evans wrote:
pacman -Su
Not OK:
[root@shack n7dr]# pacman -Su :: Starting full system
On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 3:59 PM, C Anthony Risinger anth...@xtfx.me wrote:
On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 3:02 PM, Myra Nelson myra.nel...@hughes.net wrote:
Tom:
The concerns expressed by Evangelos and Tobias were some of the concerns I
had when the push towards systemd started. Systemd is great if
On Jul 21, 2012, at 2:40 PM, Pierre Schmitz wrote:
Did you even bother to read what Tom wrote? You can still use your old
rc.conf. It is just recommend to use the new config files instead. This
makes using initscripts and systemd in parallel easier. And there are
not 9k
Hello.
I've read all the arguments of Tom and Ionut. Here is my own $0.02 on
it. When I started using archlinux back in end of 2008, the winning
point was this file. A centralized one where you can set up a lot of
single options.
It is *far* simpler to edit /etc/rc.conf to load daemons or
Hello.
I've read all the arguments of Tom and Ionut. Here is my own $0.02 on
it. When I started using archlinux back in end of 2008, the winning
point was this file. A centralized one where you can set up a lot of
single options.
It is *far* simpler to edit /etc/rc.conf to load daemons or
19 matches
Mail list logo
