Re: [arch-general] Libreoffice Google Drive not working

Thanks a lot Andy, but I still have the problem after upgrading libcmis to 0.5.1-2 On Mon, Jul 4, 2016 at 2:59 PM, Andreas Radke wrote: > Am Mon, 4 Jul 2016 17:43:29 +0200 > schrieb Andreas Radke : > > > Am Sun, 3 Jul 2016 18:13:24 -0300 > > schrieb

Re: [arch-general] Libreoffice Google Drive not working

Am Mon, 4 Jul 2016 17:43:29 +0200 schrieb Andreas Radke : > Am Sun, 3 Jul 2016 18:13:24 -0300 > schrieb Martin Zecher via arch-general : > > > When trying to access Google Drive under Libreoffice 5.1.4-1, I get > > "The specified device is

Re: [arch-general] ML is being sent to Spam by Gmail

For me it's fixed now :) On Mon, Jul 4, 2016 at 7:40 PM, Florian Pritz via arch-general wrote: > On 16.06.2016 03:46, Eli Schwartz via arch-general wrote: >> On 06/08/2016 03:45 PM, Florian Pritz via arch-general wrote: >>> Now that is something I totally missed when

Re: [arch-general] ML is being sent to Spam by Gmail

On 16.06.2016 03:46, Eli Schwartz via arch-general wrote: > On 06/08/2016 03:45 PM, Florian Pritz via arch-general wrote: >> Now that is something I totally missed when I read their guidelines, but >> it certainly sounds like it could be the cause of these problems. I have >> just switched the

Re: [arch-general] Package are signed... but pacman doesn't like them...?

Il 04/07/2016 18:35, Christian Hesse ha scritto: > > We have three places where this can come from... > > https://git.archlinux.org/pacman.git/tree/lib/libalpm/signing.c#n1008 > https://git.archlinux.org/pacman.git/tree/lib/libalpm/signing.c#n1038 >

Re: [arch-general] Package are signed... but pacman doesn't like them...?

Giovanni 'ItachiSan' Santini on Mon, 2016/07/04 11:58: > Il 03/07/2016 23:50, Christian Hesse ha scritto: > > > > The db file is just a simple tar archive, compressed with gzip. Unzip it > > and you will find a directory for every package. Every directory

Re: [arch-general] Libreoffice Google Drive not working

Am Sun, 3 Jul 2016 18:13:24 -0300 schrieb Martin Zecher via arch-general : > When trying to access Google Drive under Libreoffice 5.1.4-1, I get > "The specified device is invalid". This problem should be fixed since > 5.1.3.2 according to >

Re: [arch-general] Package are signed... but pacman doesn't like them...?

Il 03/07/2016 23:50, Christian Hesse ha scritto: > > Looks like the build service produces invalid db files, > home_ItachiSan_archlinux_Arch_Extra.db in your case. > > The db file is just a simple tar archive, compressed with gzip. Unzip it and > you will find a directory for every package.