Re: [arch-general] ML is being sent to Spam by Gmail

2016-06-08 6:26 GMT+02:00 Eli Schwartz via arch-general < arch-general@archlinux.org>: > > > dkim header remarks indicate either failed or missing dkim sigs for > those messages. > > Is anyone else seeing this behavior change? > I didn't look very long but i could only find one message from this

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] AUR ToS (aka making AUR user names public)

2017-03-06 12:53 GMT+01:00 Mauro Santos via arch-general < arch-general@archlinux.org>: > On 06-03-2017 11:20, Henrik Danielsson via arch-general wrote: > > 2017-03-06 11:18 GMT+01:00 Ralf Mardorf <silver.bul...@zoho.com>: > >> > >> Privacy is

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] AUR ToS (aka making AUR user names public)

2017-03-06 12:58 GMT+01:00 Martin Kühne via arch-general <arch-general@archlinux.org>: > > On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 12:21 PM, Henrik Danielsson via arch-general > <arch-general@archlinux.org> wrote: > > I was not replying to anyone in particular. Gaetan? Sorry, you lo

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] AUR ToS (aka making AUR user names public)

2017-03-06 11:39 GMT+01:00 Martin Kühne via arch-general < arch-general@archlinux.org>: > > Gaetan's criticism applies to you here, now. please designate > paragraphs of text which you reply to. > I was not replying to anyone in particular. Gaetan? Sorry, you lost me there.

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] AUR ToS (aka making AUR user names public)

2017-03-06 14:36 GMT+01:00 Mauro Santos via arch-general <arch-general@archlinux.org>: > On 06-03-2017 12:45, Henrik Danielsson via arch-general wrote: >> 2017-03-06 12:53 GMT+01:00 Mauro Santos via arch-general < >> arch-general@archlinux.org>: >> >>>

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] AUR ToS (aka making AUR user names public)

2017-03-06 11:18 GMT+01:00 Ralf Mardorf : > > Privacy is a principle. You seem not to understand the difference > between giving somebody data with the formal permission to use this data > and data that simply is available for everybody, but not explicitly > handed over to

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] AUR ToS (aka making AUR user names public)

2017-03-06 15:01 GMT+01:00 Ralf Mardorf : > On Mon, 6 Mar 2017 13:45:37 +0100, Henrik Danielsson wrote: >>We could simply deny the AUR username request it for the same reason, >>or no reason at all. Since some people seem uncomfortable about what >>could be derived from a

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] AUR ToS (aka making AUR user names public)

I guess I'll be the devil's advocate. I see no privacy issues in handing over a list of already public information You could deny it for practical reasons though, if you simply could not be bothered to scrape/export such a list yourself. Denying or allowing won't stop anyone from obtaining the

Re: [arch-general] Depends on foo-bar=10.0-3

2017-08-15 21:10 GMT+02:00 Eli Schwartz : > Oddly enough, I use Thunderbird, which displays HTML mail fine, and > viewing the message source tells me that message was formatted as > (mangled) plaintext. The one I sent first, from my phone, clearly has the header for

Re: [arch-general] Depends on foo-bar=10.0-3

2017-08-15 15:32 GMT+02:00 Eli Schwartz : > I have no patience for reading people's broken quoting. Please try > again, this time using a decent email client. > The Gmail Android app sends HTML emails - which I forgot when replying during my lunch break - and I'm sorry for

Re: [arch-general] Depends on foo-bar=10.0-3

Den 15 aug. 2017 13:46 skrev "Eli Schwartz" : On 08/15/2017 03:47 AM, Paul Gideon Dann via arch-general wrote: > Yes, partial upgrades are unsupported, but in practice this still happens, > usually not deliberately. For instance, I will quite often do a "pacman -S > "

Re: [arch-general] Why there is no NetworkManager in ArchISO

2017-07-24 9:36 GMT+02:00 Junayeed Ahnaf via arch-general : > All fine and good but I don't see arch being installed on something > other than desktop/laptop. Of course there are niche cases as arch > server I do not doubt but how much of arch install base is

Re: [arch-general] Yes you have standing to sue GRSecurity - Two options that can be used in concert or separately

Den 1 aug. 2017 06:29 skrev "Grady Martin via arch-general" < arch-general@archlinux.org>: On 2017年07月31日 17時07分, Jelle van der Waa wrote: > I'm not sure what you want to achieve by posting this to arch-general, > this issue really does not concern Arch Linux and I would argue it is out > off