Re: Upgrade failure

On Sun, Mar 3, 2024 at 7:01 PM Genes Lists wrote: > > On Sun, 2024-03-03 at 14:06 -0800, David Bohman wrote: > > > > :.. > > > : Replace libblockdev-utils with extra/libblockdev? [Y/n] > > I wonder whether its possible you answered 'no' instead of 'yes' to > this? > > > -- > Gene > I hit

Re: Upgrade failure

On Mon, Mar 4, 2024 at 10:56 AM wrote: > > On 3/3/24 23:50, David Bohman wrote: > > The fix was to force an upgrade of libblockdev-utils first. > For the others: No "fix" needed, you just have to answer Y after > 'Replace libblockdev-utils with extra/libblockdev? [Y/n]' > Y > If it doesn't work,

Re: Upgrade failure

On Mon, Mar 4, 2024 at 2:21 AM Martin Rys wrote: > > Doesn't look like it's user error. > > https://www.reddit.com/r/archlinux/comments/1b67kih/libblockdevutils_and_upgrade_dilema/ > > Martin I did not see that post, but that was my solution: pacman -S libblockdev-utils pacman -Su When the

Re: Upgrade failure

> These should be an option at old.reddit.com/prefs > to not use new Reddit, and thus always get the > old version at www. Should minimize the headaches you get with old and dusty > Reddit links. Thanks, @Aaron -- Best Regards, Abraham Sent with Tutanota;

Upgrade failure

On Mon, 4 Mar 2024 14:07:47 +0100 (CET) "Abraham S.A.H." wrote: > >  > >https://www.reddit.com/r/archlinux/comments/1b67kih/libblockdevutils_and_upgrade_dilema/ > > > > Can't open. First answer: pacman -S libblockdev-utils; pacman -Syu Possibly a packaging mistake. Another reply: I

Re: Upgrade failure

On 3/3/24 23:50, David Bohman wrote: The fix was to force an upgrade of libblockdev-utils first. For the others: No "fix" needed, you just have to answer Y after 'Replace libblockdev-utils with extra/libblockdev? [Y/n]' Y If it doesn't work, it means you don't really run Arch but Manjaro or

Re: Upgrade failure

Maybe a nice alternative is to use alternative privacy-focused frontends like redlib[1] or teddit[2]. They're goal is exactly to allow access to Reddit to everyone without a bloated interface or letting Reddit have your data. [1] https://github.com/redlib-org/redlib [2]

Re: Upgrade failure

> It's a few months that reddit blocks many kind of visitors. Odd, I've been accessing it in China over a VPN for many years. Do you have issues with any other website, and what happens when you replace "www" with "old"? Cheers, Aᴀʀᴏɴ

Re: Upgrade failure

>  >https://www.reddit.com/r/archlinux/comments/1b67kih/libblockdevutils_and_upgrade_dilema/ Can't open. It's a few months that reddit blocks many kind of visitors.   Your IP is from middle east? Blocked.   >From China? Blocked.   >From a proxy server? Blocked.   >From a VPN? Blocked.   With

Re: Upgrade failure

Doesn't look like it's user error. https://www.reddit.com/r/archlinux/comments/1b67kih/libblockdevutils_and_upgrade_dilema/ Martin On Mon, Mar 4, 2024 at 7:32 AM Genes Lists wrote: > > On Sun, 2024-03-03 at 14:06 -0800, David Bohman wrote: > > > > :.. > > > : Replace libblockdev-utils

Re: Upgrade failure

The fix was to force an upgrade of libblockdev-utils first. David On Sun, Mar 3, 2024 at 2:06 PM David Bohman wrote: > > % sudo pacman -Syu > :: Synchronizing package databases... > core is up to date > extra is up to date > :: Starting full system upgrade... > :: Replace libblockdev-utils

Re: Upgrade failure

On Sun, 2024-03-03 at 14:06 -0800, David Bohman wrote: > > :.. > : Replace libblockdev-utils with extra/libblockdev? [Y/n] I wonder whether its possible you answered 'no' instead of 'yes' to this? -- Gene signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Upgrade failure

% sudo pacman -Syu :: Synchronizing package databases... core is up to date extra is up to date :: Starting full system upgrade... :: Replace libblockdev-utils with extra/libblockdev? [Y/n] resolving dependencies... looking for conflicting packages... error: unresolvable package conflicts