\repositories\metadata-repository\or g\apache\archiva\metadata\tests
\snap_shots_a\1.0-alpha-11-SNAPSHOT\.svn\tmp\text-base
\snap_shots_a-1.0-alpha-11-20070302 ..212723-3.war.svn-base': The
system cannot find the path specified.
/snipped
--
Brett Porter
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http
, but I still need
to
be able to click around a _single_ repository with the
/repository/repo-id/ path.
--
Brett Porter
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
/artifactId
+/exclusion
+ /exclusions
/dependency
dependency
groupIdorg.springframework/groupId
--
Brett Porter
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
--
Brett Porter
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
Results:
+1, binding: Myself, Deng, Nicolas, Fabrice
+1, non-binding: James, Dan
+0: Wendy
I'll proceed with the release and announcement.
Cheers,
Brett
On 04/04/2008, at 4:23 AM, Brett Porter wrote:
Hi
The Archiva 1.0.2 release candidate has been staged.
This release includes 41 fixes
On 07/04/2008, at 4:17 PM, Wendy Smoak wrote:
On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 7:23 PM, Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The Archiva 1.0.2 release candidate has been staged.
...
[ ] +1 Release it!
[ ] 0
[ ] -1 Don't release it, because...
+0 - I've only had time to briefly try
* * ?] for database update is invalid.
Defaulting to hourly.
What's strange is that the web page shows three *'s when I submit
it, not two.
--
Wendy
--
Brett Porter
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
and suggestions are entertained.
This could probably take up a good half of the time if we have a few
people in there - I think this is the best bit :)
- Brett
--
Brett Porter
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
, we'd
need to find out.
Cheers,
Brett
--
Brett Porter
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
if artifact not
present (default)
Please tell me now if these aren't descriptive enough, firstly :)
For the one that propagates at the end, I'll look into a way to list
all the errors that occurred in the response.
WDYT?
Cheers,
Brett
--
Brett Porter
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http
the reference. It also results in
more content in the root POM that could be pushed down to the modules
POM. What do others think?
- Brett
On 29/03/2008, at 2:19 PM, Brett Porter wrote:
Ok, I've done this - will now work on cleaning up the reporting.
I also changed the group ID
On 30/03/2008, at 2:22 PM, Wendy Smoak wrote:
On Sat, Mar 29, 2008 at 5:20 PM, Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
The only one I'm not sure about is the cli module - it's at the top
level since it seems separate enough and for distribution, but it
contains code so it's excluded from
On 29/03/2008, at 1:30 AM, Wendy Smoak wrote:
On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 1:36 PM, Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
/archiva
/archiva-docs
/archiva-jetty
/archiva-modules
.. current structure under here
This means we can retain the one release, one build - but all the
Java
code
. This allows us to put all the Java code
reporting in there, and not pollute the -docs and the distro with it.
I think more changes can be made to the structure of -modules, but
that can be done at a later time.
Any objections?
- Brett
--
Brett Porter
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://blogs.exist.com
-
alpha-8:runtime (selected for runtime)
org.codehaus.plexus:plexus-maven-plugin:maven-plugin:1.3.5:runtime
(selected for runtime)
Seeing anything that might be the likely suspect?
- Joakim
Brett Porter wrote:
It doesn't for me. Can you check what plugin versions you have?
- Brett
On 24/03
org.codehaus.plexus.taskqueue.execution.TaskExecutor:repository-
scanning
- Finished repository task:
--
Wendy
--
Brett Porter
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
the jdo mapping pieces and xml bindings for the
database backup/restore functions too.
wdyt?
- Joakim
--
Brett Porter
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
- I'd move it up to the top level already since it
doesn't have any correlation to trunk.
- Brett
--
Brett Porter
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
)
+++ maven/archiva/trunk/pom.xml Sun Mar 23 22:02:11 2008
@@ -175,7 +175,9 @@
modulearchiva-scheduled/module
modulearchiva-web/module
modulearchiva-cli/module
+!-- Causes Build Loop :-(
modulearchiva-docs/module
+ --
/modules
dependencies
dependency
--
Brett Porter
- wdyt?
Cheers,
Brett
--
Brett Porter
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
and perform a
series of identification checks in an attempt to identify the Jar
file based on jar file contents, and even similarity to jar files
found in the JarInfo indexes.
That's all the info I can squeeze out tonite, hopefully someone else
will find this useful.
Thanks,
- Joakim
--
Brett
in helping out/testing it?
Thanks!
Cheers,
Brett
--
Brett Porter
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
Hi all,
The board approved the resolution we submitted, so Archiva is now a TLP.
I look forward to working with you all on moving forward with this!
Cheers,
Brett
--
Brett Porter
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
I thought this might be of interest to some people here:
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/ARCHIVA/Setting+up+Archiva+in+Eclipse+with+Q4E
Cheers,
Brett
--
Brett Porter
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/ARCHIVA/Index
I just did this by hand, so I apologise for losing history but it was
never going to be feasible to import :(
Cheers,
Brett
--
Brett Porter
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
Redback since they have that in common.
On it's trunk? Nothing has changed so maybe it's a problem with the
mail.jar on your system?
- Brett
--
Brett Porter
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
too - did anyone
noticed archiva jetty bakes a 53Mb ZIP file? :) It seems everything is
included in repo/*, when really we just want the Jetty JARs.
- Brett
--
Brett Porter
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
Hi Nicolas,
What is left before merging the branch in?
- Brett
--
Brett Porter
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
No problem - I'll drop it in :)
On 13/03/2008, at 3:08 AM, nicolas de loof wrote:
Nothing left for me. My +1 to merge
Not beeing at home this week I cannot acces SVN.
Nico
2008/3/12, Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi Nicolas,
What is left before merging the branch in?
- Brett
--
Brett
:
What would it take to use Subversion as the back-end for Archiva?
I noticed we have JSPWiki incubating now, and they can do it...
http://www.jspwiki.org/wiki/SubversionProvider
--
Wendy
--
Brett Porter
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
.
The appassembler nicely generates the wrapper conf file and different
platforms you request. Much easier to upgrade the wrapper or
reconfigure or duplicate for Continuum, etc.
- Brett
--
Brett Porter
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
. --
+ urlhttp://j.random.server.com/docs/${project.groupId}/$
{project.artifactId}/${project.version}/url
scm
connectionscm:svn:${prj.svn}/${prj.svn.branch}/connection
--
Brett Porter
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Jesse McConnell ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Brett Porter ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Edwin Punzalan ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Carlos Sanchez ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Wendy Smoak ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
John Tolentino ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Emmanuel Venisse ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER
On 05/03/2008, at 9:20 PM, Brett Porter wrote:
Cool! I will pass this on to the board for the meeting later this
month.
I will also note that I removed Dennis at his request on the Maven PMC
list - he will remain as a committer but felt his contributions had
not yet been significant
Cool. Is there anything left to do on here now, or should we look at
merging it to trunk?
On 02/03/2008, at 6:33 PM, nicolas de loof wrote:
That's what I supposed but just want to verify.
2008/3/1, Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
It may not be necessary - presumably webwork's built
.
--
Brett Porter
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
into this since we used to have leaks from the webapp
when it never released the components.
Very cool stuff :)
- Brett
--
Brett Porter
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
Any objections?
James
--
Brett Porter
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
reading the CacheFailureTransferTest.xml file as a plexus
descriptor?
- Brett
--
Brett Porter
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
is the
requirement on
RepositoryContentFactory for the Contextualizable interface, and
direct
access to the PlexusContainer.
I plan to create a PlexusContainerAdapter to expose Spring beans
Nicolas.
2008/2/25, Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 25/02/2008, at 10:23 PM, nicolas de loof wrote:
Can
PROTECTED])
Joakim Erdfelt ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Arnaud Heritier ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Dennis Lundberg ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Jesse McConnell ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Brett Porter ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Edwin Punzalan ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Carlos Sanchez ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Wendy Smoak ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
John Tolentino
Hi Joakim,
James pointed out trunk wasn't building and it seems that the upgrade
of commons-io was the cause. I can't just roll that back as there are
now other dependencies on the new API.
Can you find out what's up?
- Brett
--
Brett Porter
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://blogs.exist.com
On 21/02/2008, at 8:07 PM, Ben Lidgey wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Brett Porter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 21 February 2008 07:03
To: archiva-dev@maven.apache.org
Subject: should Archiva talk about requesting to become a top
level project?
[snip]
Is there anyone lurking
) but
requires
some conf ...
I've posted on spring forum :
http://forum.springframework.org/showthread.php?t=50181
2008/2/20, Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
This is way cooler than what I was doing :)
Can you replace the calls to the other factories so we can see this
in
action
(though it might still have some plexus components we'll want to
pick up).
Cheers,
Brett
--
Brett Porter
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
but archiva doesnt.
Any ideas?
Robert Simmons Jr
Senior Software Engineer
ICAT Managers LLC http://www.icat.com/
W: +1 (303) 447-1155 x2431
M: +1 (720) 346-3868
--
Brett Porter
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
On 21/02/2008, at 1:36 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+ instanciation-strategyper-lookup/instanciation-strategy
typo?
- Brett
--
Brett Porter
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
can migrate components in isolation, without
requirement for changes in many places because some other
component has (or
has not yet) been updated to use spring.
Nico.
2008/2/20, Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 20/02/2008, at 6:33 PM, nicolas de loof wrote:
What about a Combined Plexus
The discussions this week have been pretty healthy, releases going
smoothly, and there is user and developer interest.
Today, Continuum has graduated to be a top level project and I feel
Archiva is well on track. What do others think?
BTW, SVN lists the following committers (snipped a
are purely
looking to operate Archiva as a secured proxy and the administration
features of the webapp could be separately secured since there are
often less users needing to be set up for that.
- Brett
-- Robert
-Original Message-
From: Brett Porter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent
()
throws InitializationException
{
urlFailureCache = (UrlFailureCache)
springFactory.lookup( urlFailureCache );
}
The next thing we should probably try is using something like
SpringCache as suggested to remove the plexus-cache dependency.
Have fun!
Cheers,
Brett
--
Brett
And merge them into:
* 1.0
Any objections?
- Joakim
--
Brett Porter
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
, and getting this in the Struts 2 build:
$mvn install -Pall
...
Couldn't find a version in [1.6] to match range [1.7,)
commons-digester:commons-digester:jar:null
If I go straight to central, no problem.
--
Wendy
--
Brett Porter
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
,
Brett
[1] http://docs.codehaus.org/display/MAVENUSER/Archiva+Roadmap
On 11/02/2008, at 5:07 PM, Maria Odea Ching wrote:
On Feb 7, 2008 7:08 PM, Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have some additions :)
I also think we need to keep reviewing the types of problems people
have and helping them
/02/2008, at 12:16 AM, Brett Porter wrote:
These all sound good to me. Really enjoying the discussion :)
Some comments and additions:
On 06/02/2008, at 5:48 PM, Maria Odea Ching wrote:
From the thread so far, these are the things to choose from for the
1.1roadmap:
1. Reduce memory
the wagon consuming from an
InputStream and pushing to an OutputStream and can trace the byte
count along the way?
Cheers,
Brett
--
Brett Porter
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
)
What I'm want to propose is the removal of Wagon and replacing it
with a
more flexible library (perhaps we could cook something up with
commons-vfs?)
So what do you think? Suggestions?
Thanks
James Dumay
--
Brett Porter
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
Just coming back to this - it is working for me now.
(Perhaps this is because the site plugin was downgraded again, since
the docs were broken with the latest release)
On 31/12/2007, at 6:06 AM, Wendy Smoak wrote:
I'm having trouble running 'mvn site' from archiva/trunk. (Also from
the
Are these things that have disappeared, or just caught your attention
again? Probably best just to put them in JIRA for 1.1?
- Brett
On 01/02/2008, at 11:27 PM, Wendy Smoak wrote:
On Jan 29, 2008 4:11 AM, Maria Odea Ching [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The Archiva 1.0.1 release candidate has
It really depends on whether you are looking to use the 1.1.9
enhnacement features, or the 1.1.9 runtime features. I think the bug
it was addressing was in the runtime - so to upgrade would be nice but
non essential.
As for the conversion, I'm not really sure...
- Brett
On 30/01/2008, at
+1! :)
I'm running it now, ran through my standard set up and checked the
distribution.
Just some minor issues to adjust in the release process for the docs:
- site.xml version needs to be adjusted prior to release in docs
- release notes in the docs need to be updated before build
Cheers,
for MRM-667 needs to be
applied,
as well as Nicolas' commit for MRM-670..
Thanks,
Deng
On Jan 29, 2008 9:29 AM, Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nicolas,
This can't be part of the 1.0.1 release - we haven't created the
branch yet, right?
I guess we can create it based on a previous revision
agreed, though I hope it is short lived :)
On 25/01/2008, at 11:54 PM, Wendy Smoak wrote:
There was some discussion on IRC last night about branching Archiva
1.0 to allow trunk to move on as 1.1.
Thoughts?
--
Wendy
Hi Joakim,
I read your comment on here: http://www.plasticboy.de/?
p=24#comment-16. I was wondering what mysql issues you are referring
to - since I don't recall anyone bringing it up and couldn't find it
in JIRA?
BTW, that article is quite good - we should link it somewhere :)
Cheers,
to acces continuum, both from
Home and
Office.
Need something to configure ???
Seems my last update of MDO files to mark version 1.1.0 broke
something.
I'll check this this morning.
2007/12/14, Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Nicolas,
Did you forget to check something in?
- Brett
Nicolas,
Did you forget to check something in?
- Brett
On 14/12/2007, at 12:51 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Online report :
http://maven.zones.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=38858projectId=271
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Failed
Started at: Fri 14 Dec
http://maven.apache.org/developers/maven-eclipse-codestyle.xml
Thanks!
- Brett
On 12/12/2007, at 10:35 PM, Dário Oliveros wrote:
Thank you for letting me contribute with such a nice project. I
appreciate
it.
BTW do you happen to have any code style formatter profile for Eclipse
Europa ?
- maybe a different version of
the assembly plugin.
No big deal for the release - will just file a JIRA.
- Brett
--
Brett Porter - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Blog: http://www.devzuz.org/blogs/bporter/
their feedback. Please
make sure
to
test it before voting ;-)
[ ] +1 Release it!
[ ] 0
[ ] -1 Don't release it, because...
The vote will be open for 72 hours. So, cast your votes now..
Thanks,
Deng
--
Brett Porter - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Blog: http://www.devzuz.org/blogs/bporter/
Hi all,
I've rolled in the changes I discussed recently. I'm targeting 1.0 to
minimise re-editing, so we won't be able to deploy in the short term
to the top level.
If anyone wants to pick up those stubs to write something, please do :)
Cheers,
Brett
--
Brett Porter - [EMAIL PROTECTED
.
Thoughts, flames? All totally undoable, but I think this is the way
to go :)
Cheers,
Brett
--
Brett Porter - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Blog: http://www.devzuz.org/blogs/bporter/
/dependency
dependency
--
- Joakim Erdfelt
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Open Source Software (OSS) Developer
--
Brett Porter - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Blog: http://www.devzuz.org/blogs/bporter/
...
--
Brett Porter - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Blog: http://www.devzuz.org/blogs/bporter/
On 05/11/2007, at 2:36 PM, Brett Porter wrote:
On 05/11/2007, at 2:32 PM, Joakim Erdfelt wrote:
There's nothing to present the There are no repositories you have
access to style message on the xwork side.
I should add that.
This doesn't seem to be the problem below though?
Ah, I
cool, go for it
On 06/11/2007, at 11:34 AM, Maria Odea Ching wrote:
Fine with me.. I've looked at some of the codes last night and it
looks good :)
-Deng
Joakim Erdfelt wrote:
Brett Porter wrote:
On 05/11/2007, at 2:36 PM, Brett Porter wrote:
On 05/11/2007, at 2:32 PM, Joakim Erdfelt
,
--
Brett Porter - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Blog: http://www.devzuz.org/blogs/bporter/
default profiles in the settings if it's
that much of a pain?
- Brett
--
Brett Porter - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Blog: http://www.devzuz.org/blogs/bporter/
can fail
fast?
- Brett
--
Brett Porter - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Blog: http://www.devzuz.org/blogs/bporter/
do when I encounter a failure? CACHE or DON'T CACHE. But IGNORED/
SKIP/DISABLED/REJECT don't make sense in this context (at least with
the given behaviour)
* What should I do when a checksum is invalid? IGNORE, FIX or FAIL.
Make sense?
Brett Porter wrote:
I'd say 2)
please just change
yep, just under checksums I'd append if they were previously
incorrect to the description for FIX and on downloaded resources
to IGNORE.
Thanks,
Brett
On 01/11/2007, at 11:55 AM, Joakim Erdfelt wrote:
Brett Porter wrote:
(old) IGNORED, ONCE, HOURLY, DAILY, DISABLED
(proposed) ALWAYS
ones I fixed and/or filed already :).
Cheers,
Brett
On 30/10/2007, at 4:11 PM, Maria Odea Ching wrote:
I can do another release at the end of this week :) Everybody okay
with that?
-Deng
Brett Porter wrote:
I've merged 1.0-beta-4 back into 1.0-beta-3 in JIRA too.
When would you like to cut
well represented with the following training and
presentations:
* Brett Porter and Maria Odea Ching: A Development Ecosystem with
Apache Maven, Continuum and Archiva (includes OSSummit certification)
http://www.ossummit.com/2007/program/talk/24
* Brett Porter: Apache Maven Best Practices
http
/
Everyone is encouraged to vote and give their feedback.
[ ] +1 Release it!
[ ] 0
[ ] -1 Don't release it, because...
The vote will be open for 72 hours. So, cast your votes now ;-)
Here's my +1
Thanks,
Deng
--
Brett Porter - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Blog: http://www.devzuz.org/blogs/bporter/
-2/
Everyone is encouraged to vote and give their feedback.
[ ] +1 Release it!
[ ] 0
[ ] -1 Don't release it, because...
The vote will be open for 72 hours. So, cast your votes now ;-)
Here's my +1
Thanks,
Deng
--
Brett Porter - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Blog: http://www.devzuz.org/blogs
, and overzealous logging?)
Let's not forget that two of them would have existed in 1.0-beta-2,
so a release isn't harming anyone.
MRM-561 is disappointing, since it's a regression, but not critical
enough to block the release IMO.
If it were a final release I'd say differently.
- Brett
--
Brett
On 23/10/2007, at 12:45 AM, Arnaud HERITIER wrote:
and when I start it I have it saying welcome you to maven Archiva
Unknown,
already fixed this one on trunk
instead to have 1.0-beta-3
Otherwise it seems to work fine (tested only with maven 2).
+1
On 22/10/2007, Brett Porter [EMAIL
) - we need to start
thinking about the accumulation of logic in the web actions and
shuffle it over to the business layer.
Thanks!
Cheers,
Brett
--
Brett Porter - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Blog: http://www.devzuz.org/blogs/bporter/
even better :)
On 21/10/2007, at 1:05 AM, Joakim Erdfelt wrote:
Well, you do have a point there.
If the passed in repoId matches on either a sourceId or a targetId,
then the proxy connector should be deleted.
wdyt?
- Joakim
Brett Porter wrote:
ugh, I obviously need new eyes. two times
On 19/10/2007, at 11:36 AM, Brett Porter wrote:
archiva-base/archiva-proxy/src/test/java/org/apache/maven/archiva/
proxy/ManagedDefaultTransferTest.java:392:/* FIXME
archiva-base/archiva-proxy/src/test/java/org/apache/maven/archiva/
proxy/ManagedLegacyTransferTest.java:129:/* FIXME
those routines against it to
sanity check a repository against Archiva compat? And then reduce the
unit tests to the representative set of conditions we know we support
now?
- Brett
--
Brett Porter - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Blog: http://www.devzuz.org/blogs/bporter/
and move forward in that way.
- Brett
--
Brett Porter - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Blog: http://www.devzuz.org/blogs/bporter/
Thoughts?
MRM-37 is done, but the following are outstanding:
- r583412 response
- plexus-webdav release (looks like it's getting close)
- MRM-398 was reopened (though it's not a blocker problem)
Cheers,
Brett
On 14/10/2007, at 9:55 AM, Brett Porter wrote:
Attempted to send this last week
to be spread out across multiple revisions
again - what tooling are you using?
- Brett
--
Brett Porter - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Blog: http://www.devzuz.org/blogs/bporter/
every imperfected API right now. Especially when I can't get a
response to what is essentially a veto on a commit and the drive to a
release... please take a look at these.
Lets put it up for a vote now.
Put what up for a vote now? The rename? I don't see any need.
Cheers,
Brett
--
Brett
notifications for the past
48 hours.
Is it still running?
--
- Joakim Erdfelt
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Open Source Software (OSS) Developer
--
Brett Porter - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Blog: http://www.devzuz.org/blogs/bporter/
we should
be running in the unit tests. It's way too huge.
Cheers,
Brett
--
Brett Porter - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Blog: http://www.devzuz.org/blogs/bporter/
to better manage my commit sizes and scope in the future.
Thanks, much appreciated!
- Brett
--
Brett Porter - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Blog: http://www.devzuz.org/blogs/bporter/
);
}
-
+
public void addChangeListener( RegistryListener listener )
{
addRegistryChangeListener( listener );
@@ -351,7 +354,6 @@
section.addChangeListener( listener );
}
}
-
public void initialize()
throws InitializationException
--
Brett Porter - [EMAIL
)
+{
+if ( SystemUtils.IS_OS_WINDOWS )
+{
+return path.replace( '/', '\\' );
+}
+return path;
}
}
--
Brett Porter - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Blog: http://www.devzuz.org/blogs/bporter/
of a repository more reliable. No more shortcuts available to the
consumers.
- Joakim
Brett Porter wrote:
I haven't reviewed this commit in detail, but can you explain:
a) what actuallly changed (is this *just* replacing
ArchivaRepository instances with relevant configuration objects?)
b) why
1 - 100 of 145 matches
Mail list logo
