[fedora-arm] arm software floating point support going forward

2013-01-25 Thread Dennis Gilmore
Hi all, I wanted to kick off a discussion, I think that with the work that Seneca is doing for armv6hl to support the Raspberry Pi most of the need for building sfp has gone away. I would like us to drop support for sfp in F19 that means that anyone running a kirkwood based system would get

Re: [fedora-arm] arm software floating point support going forward

2013-01-25 Thread Peter Robinson
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 4:37 PM, Gordan Bobic gor...@bobich.net wrote: On Fri, 25 Jan 2013 10:22:23 -0600, Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us wrote: Hi all, I wanted to kick off a discussion, I think that with the work that Seneca is doing for armv6hl to support the Raspberry Pi most of the

Re: [fedora-arm] arm software floating point support going forward

2013-01-25 Thread Brendan Conoboy
On 01/25/2013 08:22 AM, Dennis Gilmore wrote: Hi all, I wanted to kick off a discussion, I think that with the work that Seneca is doing for armv6hl to support the Raspberry Pi most of the need for building sfp has gone away. I would like us to drop support for sfp in F19 that means that anyone

Re: [fedora-arm] arm software floating point support going forward

2013-01-25 Thread Josh Boyer
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 11:22 AM, Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us wrote: Hi all, I wanted to kick off a discussion, I think that with the work that Seneca is doing for armv6hl to support the Raspberry Pi most of the need for building sfp has gone away. I would like us to drop support for sfp

Re: [fedora-arm] arm software floating point support going forward

2013-01-25 Thread Sean Omalley
I have a lot of kirkwood, a pi, no armv7, and no $$ atm so Im not anxious to have support dropped. :) I do understand the dilemma..:) I think kirkwood is about the only popular armv5tel but there are other 926 chips running around, and the Cortex A5 only has an optional FPU. The part of the