Armchairs,
As the US recession looms larger and longer, Bush and his folk are found in the uneasy position of trying some active fiscal policies...
In a very simplistic macro view, raising public expenditures or lowering taxes (in the short run) were both considered "expansionist" fiscal
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a very simplistic macro view, raising public expenditures or lowering
taxes (in the short run) were both considered expansionist fiscal
policies--at least in the sense that both increase public sector
deficits... they are equivalent policies.
The
Hey,
I know this may be a little late, but you might try
the traffic forum: www.trafficforum.de . I can't make
any promises, but it might be useful. At least the
java applets on the links page are fun to play
with
Best regards,
jsh
__
Do You
In a message dated 8/20/02 7:58:33 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a very simplistic macro view, raising public expenditures or lowering
taxes (in the short run) were both considered expansionist fiscal
policies--at least in the sense that both increase
Eric Crampton wrote:
They offer a program encouraging people to fight traffic tickets. Members
who challenge their speeding tickets in court and lose are compensated for
the cost of their ticket by the Association. While one might expect
adverse selection to bankrupt the organization (or
On Tue, 20 Aug 2002, Bryan Caplan wrote:
I suppose they don't pay the higher insurance premiums - probably 80-90%
of the full amount you pay for a traffic offense.
They offer 2 policies: under the first one (cheaper) they pay your ticket
if you lose. You pay the fine and submit the receipt;
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
As a libertarian purist, with a particular bug in my ear
about immigration, . . .
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is that a pro-immigration bug (libertarian supporting open borders?)
Er, yes. I have heard some libertarian arguments for influx control
but found them
