Re: Journal response times

2002-10-14 Thread William Sjostrom
I haven't had a chance to actually look at Ellison's paper, but a quick observation. A few years ago, the AER raised the submission fee substantially because, it said, the old fee of $10 was so low that people were sending papers in way too early just because AER refereeing was a cheap source of

RE: Journal response times

2002-10-14 Thread Ben Powell
Robson, Alex wrote: The data are average times (measured in months) between initial submission and acceptance at various economics journals in the year 1999. It seems that the long times quoted in this article are something different than what fabio was talking about. I have not read the

Re: (book review)The Case against Government Science

2002-10-14 Thread Alypius Skinner
- Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] With the widespread intrusion of the federal government into the lives and business of everyone, it might be fruitful to consider a spectrum of research spanning the gamut from purely private to purely governmental rather than considering

RE: Journal response times

2002-10-14 Thread fabio guillermo rojas
The data are average times (measured in months) between initial submission and acceptance at various economics journals in the year 1999. It seems that the long times quoted in this article are something different than what fabio was talking about. I have not read the article but the

Re: (book review)The Case against Government Science

2002-10-14 Thread AdmrlLocke
In a message dated 10/14/02 4:32:57 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] With the widespread intrusion of the federal government into the lives and business of everyone, it might be fruitful to consider a spectrum of research spanning the